Soren-a
Topic Author
Posts: 223
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2001 10:13 pm

Teleconverter Question

Sun Jun 23, 2002 6:22 am

Hi

I just have a quick question about teleconverters.

I have thought about buying a Sigma 2x APO teleconverter to use mainly with my Sigma 170-500mm APO lens.

I also have a 75-300mm Canon lens, and I was wondering if a Sigma 2x APO converter can be used with this Canon lens?? I ask in my local photoshop and he told me that he was not sure, so does anyone here know??

Thanks in advance

Søren Augustesen
 
Craigy
Posts: 1076
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2001 6:24 am

RE: Teleconverter Question

Sun Jun 23, 2002 8:53 am

Søren,
The first thing to consider is can you afford to lose 2 stops with the 170-500?
I assume that you want to use it in the 500-1000mm range, which would require extremely fast shutter speed or fast film. I am assuming that you are shooting fast moving aircraft.

I looked up your shots in the database - nice.

Craig.
 
jwenting
Posts: 9973
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2001 10:12 pm

RE: Teleconverter Question

Sun Jun 23, 2002 4:41 pm

Indeed use at least a monopod and preferably a tripod with that combo!
It's slow, long and heavy which is an open invitation to severely shaken images.

Usually, teleconverters are designed for specific lenses. I believe the Sigma converters are optimised only for certain of their lenses. They may work on other brand lenses, but with less than optimal results.

Teleconverters are also not usually designed for zoomlenses (with exceptions like the Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 AF-S). You'd best check with a reputable dealer about it before making the purchase and ask to try it as the Sigma catalogue and website do NOT list the 170-500 as being compatible with their teleconverters http://www.sigmaphoto.com/html/pages/ConvComptChart.htm.
At best you just loose your autofocus and/or aperture settings, at worst you'll damage one or more of the components of lens, TC or camera when mounting the TC.

You're probably better off getting 2 Canon 2x teleconverters and stacking those (possible, but costs even more light). This would give you a very slow 300-1200mm lens
I wish I were flying

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos