Ljungdahl
Topic Author
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 2:10 am

Yet Another Screening Question...

Wed Oct 16, 2002 2:32 am

First of all, I must say that the screeners are doing a great job here!

I usually read the posts around how this process works, and I've believed that I understood it quite well...

...but I now realize that I not understand it fully.

I've uploaded a photo a few days ago, it's HQ'ed, and so far there's nothing unusual...

...but the strange thing is, that I have uploaded more photos after that one, and they have been accepted (most of them) and rejected (one), and it's cool, I have no problem with that.

...what I mean is, I have uploaded 2-3 photos, had them online the next day, uploaded a few more, again online a short time after, more uploads, same thing again...

...but the original HQ photo is still there, might this have something to do with that I've reuploaded it after a rejection (badangle, 1 degree off...), I corrected the angle and reuploaded the pic...

I repeat, it's no criticism, I just don't understand the way this particular case works!

Johan  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
 
PUnmuth@VIE
Posts: 3119
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 9:31 pm

RE: Yet Another Screening Question...

Wed Oct 16, 2002 2:42 am

Tzhe mechanism is called priority instant add.
If we see a picture which is a clear addition even without the need of three screeners to vote for it we cann add it instantly to the DB.
Thats why your younger picture pased the older ones.
Peter
-
 
Ljungdahl
Topic Author
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 2:10 am

RE: Yet Another Screening Question...

Wed Oct 16, 2002 2:58 am

OK, thx for the info, Peter.

Johan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests