apjung
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 3:20 pm

Would Be Rejected Under Current Standards

Thu Oct 17, 2002 1:29 pm

So far I found this one and it would be rejected for 2 reasons.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/002126/M/

I wished I had discovered A.net 3 years ago!


Andy P. Jung
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?photographersearch=Andy%20P.%20Jung&distinct_entry=true
Andy P. Jung
 
thomasphoto60
Posts: 3730
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2000 1:04 pm

RE: Would Be Rejected Under Current Standards

Thu Oct 17, 2002 1:43 pm

And your point is........?

Thomas
"Show me the Braniffs"
 
apjung
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 3:20 pm

RE: Would Be Rejected Under Current Standards

Thu Oct 17, 2002 1:55 pm

Well, if I had discovered A.net 3 years ago, I would have like thousands of photos in the database. Back then A.net would gladly accept any photo that had an aircraft in it. Now pictures of aircraft with for example ramp lice are undesirable.


Andy
Andy P. Jung
 
thomasphoto60
Posts: 3730
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2000 1:04 pm

RE: Would Be Rejected Under Current Standards

Thu Oct 17, 2002 2:11 pm

That's true, but even if A.Net today had the same acceptance standards they did some 3 years back, would you really want to bog down the database with mediocre pics ? I have quite a few medicore and poor quality pics in the db sent in during A.Net's early days that I am thinking about re-scanning or removing altogether.

Thomas
"Show me the Braniffs"
 
2912n
Posts: 1978
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 2:12 pm

RE: Would Be Rejected Under Current Standards

Thu Oct 17, 2002 2:12 pm

So the site has developed, matured and evolved. If they took crap photos I too would have thousands that qualified!!! By setting high standards it forces you to shoot better photos. If someone wants to show off crap photos then they should start their own website and post them there.  Smile

Tony
 
User avatar
clickhappy
Posts: 9042
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:10 pm

RE: Would Be Rejected Under Current Standards

Thu Oct 17, 2002 2:14 pm

the quality of that photo, in processing terms, is low, but the shot is pretty interesting.

The wide-open uncluttered ramp is quite odd, don't you think? Plus a single person wearing what looks like a religious robe or something. Not to mention a Tu-154.

I like it.
 
Staffan
Posts: 3879
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:21 am

RE: Would Be Rejected Under Current Standards

Thu Oct 17, 2002 7:39 pm

What did a decent scanner or a decent digicam cost 3 years ago, now compare those prices with today's prices.

Staffan
 
jderden777
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2000 9:56 am

RE: Would Be Rejected Under Current Standards

Thu Oct 17, 2002 11:28 pm

i was thinking about having some of my old photos deleted....but then i think...why not just leave them on here? it's part of the site now, since i submitted them long ago doesn't mean they need to be removed just because my photos now are somewhat better....hehe

i think it shows the history and the beginnings of this site to have these old photos on here...it just shows how far the site has come since it was started and when they took pretty much any photo

so i think i'll leave my shots on the database....for a little while at least  Wink/being sarcastic

jonathan d.
"my soul is in the sky" - shakespeare
 
Continental
Posts: 5223
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2000 3:46 am

RE: Would Be Rejected Under Current Standards

Fri Oct 18, 2002 1:34 am

Yes Andy, but would you be proud of you large amount of crappy photos?  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Continental
 
manzoori
Posts: 1459
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2002 7:08 am

RE: Would Be Rejected Under Current Standards

Fri Oct 18, 2002 1:53 am

I'm just impressed you took the time to find this photo....

Rez
Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
 
RayPettit
Posts: 602
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 9:04 pm

RE: Would Be Rejected Under Current Standards

Fri Oct 18, 2002 3:24 am

True, the image is of poor quality, but it should definitely stay on - an Aeroflot Tu-154 at Windhoek - yes! I don't know what other Windhoek shots there are, but as Royal said, the empty apron and the very "non-Seattle" airport personnel make this a bit different - gives it an atmosphere.

I think there a number of less interesting old shots that don't really to deserve inclusion now - you know the ones - half obscured Delta or United 737's taken through glass, of which a much better picture has since been uploaded.
However, the decision to delete any of these is really up to who put them on in the first place and I don't have too much of a problem with that.

R
 
apjung
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 3:20 pm

RE: Would Be Rejected Under Current Standards

Fri Oct 18, 2002 8:56 am

Rez, I found it by accident when I was browsing through Aeroflot pics.

Andy
Andy P. Jung

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos