JeffM
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: Why Some Of Them Was Rejected? Help

Tue Nov 19, 2002 2:09 pm

Sokol,

Those last few shots taken in Alaska are great. I am sure they gave reasons for each rejection. No armchair screening from me though. See what the others say.

v/r
Jeff
 
PRM
Posts: 326
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:17 am

RE: Why Some Of Them Was Rejected? Help

Tue Nov 19, 2002 6:12 pm

Sokol,

I'll try some armchair screening  Smile/happy/getting dizzy / constructive critique....

(1) http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=S5-AAA_FRA.jpg

Fine except for some small window reflections visible at the top of the airbridge and the baggage loader...

(2) http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=D-ABVK_FRA.jpg

Blurry/unsharp - reg and titles

(3) http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=S5-AAA_PRN.jpg

Badmotiv I would guess and unsharp

(4) http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=China_landing.jpg

Some strange things here! Blurry/unsharp, grainy and some artefacts around the trees and underside of the fuselage.

(5) http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=FedEx_Taxiing.jpg

Very blurry/unsharp - just out of focus?

(6) http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=FedEx2_Taxiing.jpg

Unsharp - titles blurred and a bit grainy

(7) http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=D-ABVD.jpg

Seems ok - unlevel though - check the lightpoles leaning left

(8) http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=S5-AAC_PRN.jpg

Unlevel with the horizon and BA 737 which drop away to the right, otherwise I like the shot!

(9) http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=D-ABUC_ANC.jpg

Composition. The van and airbridge don't help this shot with the Gemini and SAT obscured in the background

(10) http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=Singapore_9V-SFI_ANC.jpg

Very nice! Touch of overexposure seems to have blown out the highlights on the fuselage - lack of detail in the white areas.

(11) http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=China_B18703_ANC.jpg

Nice shot! But a bit soft and unlevel - poles lean slightly to the left

Tired now so I'll stop there  Laugh out loud

Hope that helps,
Paul
 
Sokol
Topic Author
Posts: 246
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2001 4:33 pm

RE: Why Some Of Them Was Rejected? Help

Tue Nov 19, 2002 6:38 pm

Thank You Paul, And what can i do with these two shots http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=Singapore_9V-SFI_ANC.jpg and
http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=China_B18703_ANC.jpg Because every one says these are great pictures.  Smile


 
PRM
Posts: 326
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:17 am

RE: Why Some Of Them Was Rejected? Help

Tue Nov 19, 2002 7:38 pm

Sokol,

Yes those two are great shots! The slightly soft China might be salvaged by using some more adaptive USM, or a higher strength USM in Photoshop on the original file; but if the problem with the SQ is the overexposure on the fuselage then I don't think there is much you can do to restore the detail lost..

Good luck
Paul
 
User avatar
apuneger
Posts: 2964
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2000 2:43 pm

RE: Why Some Of Them Was Rejected? Help

Tue Nov 19, 2002 8:20 pm

Hi,

Nice pictures. But some of them are not up to A.net standards I think. Have you looked at your own appeal page? For each picture it gives you the reason why it was rejected. So, if you're aware of those reasons, you might be able to improve them.

However some pictures:

- have too much noise (stairs, trucks,...)
- some of them are blurry/soft
- on some pictures, such as the Jumbo landing, the white is 'too white', you know what I mean?
- not level.

It's also possible that some of them were rejected because of 'badcommon'.

Just try to improve your technique a little bit. You already have the talent!

Ivan
Ivan Coninx - Brussels Aviation Photography

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests