Delta777-XXX
Topic Author
Posts: 940
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2000 3:50 am

Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 7:54 am

 
Msh744
Posts: 423
Joined: Fri May 31, 2002 10:09 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 7:59 am

Before you read this, I am no professional, but I will tell you what I think is wrong.

First Picture: tail cut off. that means automatic rejection...

Second Picture and Fourth Picture: I think you zoomed in a little too close, but as i said, I'm no professional.

Third Picture: a little soft.

All of the photos have a little bit of grain too.

Just my two cents.

Good Luck!

-Msh744
 
rsmith6621a
Posts: 1507
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:21 pm

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 8:11 am


Third Image.....

No Hooter Girls Visible.......LOL
Did You Ever Think Freedom Could Be this Bad
 
ericbelgium
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 3:24 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 8:28 am

The hooters one could do if you resize it to 850 pixels...making it look a little more sharp.

the rest is too dark anyway...

greetz, Eric
 
Shawn Patrick
Posts: 2465
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2000 7:30 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 8:38 am

I really enjoyed those DL pics, Hank. Unfortunately, airliners.net is not always the best place for artistic photos. The technical aspects must be in order for anything to be accepted. Oh well.

There's always "the other site"...  Big thumbs up

Shawn
 
User avatar
JeffM
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 8:40 am

I dunno Hank, they are interesting, but the extreme close up ones are giving me the "bad motive" feeling. The Hooters shot looks a bit blurred to me. Most importantly, how do you really feel about them? Appeal if you feel really strongly about one, but not all four.

Jeff
 
SkyGuy11
Posts: 532
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2001 7:09 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:13 am

I like #1 & 2 most. The problem with #1 again is that the tip of the tail is cut off. It would have been okay to cut off either more of it or none at all; the same thing goes for the left wing. #3 is like every other shot on the site and #4 feels too heavy on the left side IMHO. Very nice shots; this is the kind of thing airliners.net needs (again IMHO!).
.
 
SkyGuy11
Posts: 532
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2001 7:09 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:15 am

Also, #1 is a bit too contrasty.
.
 
EGGD
Posts: 11880
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2001 12:01 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:28 am

ok here is my .02c..

1. seems fine to me, the tail shouldn't matter too much but maybe the screener felt that the tail could have been included. A bit of a harsh rejection IMO because its a very atmospheric shot.

2.Badmotiv, the plane is virtually in the top corner, same with 4. If they were more centered I'd say they had a reasonable chance. They are also a bit dark for closeups.

3. Its a bit soft, and the colours are too dark. I'm pretty sure Hooters air is orange and not red so its probably something to do with exposure compensation or something...
 
ckw
Posts: 4586
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:26 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:54 am

The main problem is the backlit shots are just too dark. Yes, the screeners know it's a dark shot, but in this sort of situation we look particularly at the shadows - we expect these areas to retain some detail. In your shots, we see masses of solid black.

Shots against the light are perhaps the most difficult to get right - getting the balance between providing sufficient detail to make the shot interesting while maintaining the high contrast which gives the shot impact is tricky.

The Hooters is just soft.

Cheers,

Colin
Colin K. Work, Pixstel
 
cicadajet
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2000 1:54 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:23 am

I have to go with the consensus here Hank.

I certainly liked #1. For me, the composition is fine... but Colin's response seems to the point of what the issue is for acceptance.

Tom
 
dragogoalie
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 3:58 pm

Re:

Wed Apr 02, 2003 12:30 pm

Not to say that a.net isn't a great site, but this is why I like planepictures.net. They focus more on the picture than the photograph if you know what I mean. Its less of the resolution, lighting, etc, and more if it looks good, they accept it. I feel there is more consistancy with what they accept and what they dont because there are less screeners.

--dragogoalie-#88--
Formerly known as Jap. Srsly. AUSTRALIA: 2 days!
 
User avatar
clickhappy
Posts: 9042
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:10 pm

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 12:47 pm

I don't know how this topic has spun into a "why I like planepictures.net" discussion.

These pictures are unmotivated, dark, grainy, and the subjects are common (read: boring).

Not trying to sound like a dick, but these shots are nothing special.

Hank, the 6 shots you have here are about 500% better than these, don't sacrifice quality trying to get some pictures online.

Royal
 
dripstick
Posts: 2320
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2001 9:43 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 1:12 pm

I like them. Nice compositions, especially the first.

Dripstick <---NOT a dick

What's another word for thesaurus?
 
rsmith6621a
Posts: 1507
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:21 pm

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 1:17 pm

>>>>>I don't know how this topic has spun into a "why I like planepictures.net" discussion.

These pictures are unmotivated, dark, grainy, and the subjects are common (read: boring).

Not trying to sound like a dick, but these shots are nothing special.

Hank, the 6 shots you have here are about 500% better than these, don't sacrifice quality trying to get some pictures online.<<<<<<<

I guess this qualifiys Royal as this forums Bill O'Riely.....He says it just as it is...if you dont like the answer dont ask the question.
Did You Ever Think Freedom Could Be this Bad
 
KLAX
Posts: 1568
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:59 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:19 pm

Royal=Bill O'Riely ROFL. Yeah, I gotta give him points for tellin' it like it is. I like the clouds and reflections on #1 but it would have been so much better if it was centered.

-Clovis
 
RoastedNutz
Posts: 195
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2001 12:18 pm

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Thu Apr 03, 2003 4:01 am

I didn't know PolishAir42 moved to ATL.....

 
dragogoalie
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 3:58 pm

Re:

Fri Apr 04, 2003 1:37 pm

I dissagree with you royal, I think these pictures are great because they're different from the thousands of side shot photos on this webpage. I can see why they were rejected from a.net because they can be a little grainy, but they're still good photos.

--dragogoalie-#88--
Formerly known as Jap. Srsly. AUSTRALIA: 2 days!
 
ANA777Master
Posts: 289
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:33 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Fri Apr 04, 2003 2:10 pm

Hank- The problem is that you have a few unidimensional reviewers who prefer static-looking/uninspiring shots. There are certainly some breathtaking photos on A.net, but aren't there enough generic shots already?!
I think your #1 and #3 shots are dynamic and beautiful. The other two are a bit dark. Don't feel slighted--I love your style....Hopefully A.net will change their photo guidelines or even create a special category for dynamic/artistic shots.
 
User avatar
clickhappy
Posts: 9042
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:10 pm

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Fri Apr 04, 2003 2:54 pm

It is nice that we can all share are opinions and not get our feelings hurt.

Those "uninspired side shots" are the hardest to come by. The purest and most valuable airplane shot is a 50mm perfect side-profile shot. Next time you go out to your local airport try to get some of those. Report back to this forum and let us know how it goes.

A 3/4 shot of a landing plane moving away from you can be taken at any airport in the world.

And another thought/statement. Why is it that any shot where the whole plane wasn't in the image is considered an "artistic" shot? A colorful tail or winglet, sure, but half a plane? Not in most cases.

 
serge
Posts: 1903
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2001 2:01 pm

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Fri Apr 04, 2003 2:59 pm

I didn't know PolishAir42 moved to ATL.....


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © PolishAir42 - Chicago Aviation Photography
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © PolishAir42 - Chicago Aviation Photography




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © PolishAir42 - Chicago Aviation Photography
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © PolishAir42 - Chicago Aviation Photography




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © PolishAir42 - Chicago Aviation Photography
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © PolishAir42 - Chicago Aviation Photography




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © PolishAir42 - Chicago Aviation Photography
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © PolishAir42 - Chicago Aviation Photography



Peter has always had some great photos. But in the past some of them looked weird from that dark left-side problem (no offense Peter Big grin). Also the angle wasn't the MOST appealing in some of them- but just look at his current photos!  Wow!
 
LOT767-300ER
Posts: 8526
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2001 12:57 pm

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Fri Apr 04, 2003 3:19 pm

"Peter has always had some great photos. But in the past some of them looked weird from that dark left-side problem (no offense Peter ). Also the angle wasn't the MOST appealing in some of them- but just look at his current photos! "

Aye, that damned Dark Left Side syndrome, oh well I was learning. However I think I am improving bit by bit.

ATL bah, I never shot those kinds of shots that he did...at least not yet  Yeah sure
 
ckw
Posts: 4586
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:26 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Fri Apr 04, 2003 7:41 pm

The problem is that you have a few unidimensional reviewers who prefer static-looking/uninspiring shots

This is not about aesthetics - side on shots with similar technical flaws would be rejected as well. If the flaws pointed out by myself and others were corrected, the pics would probably be accepted.

There seems to be a feeling amongst some that because a shot is "creative" it ought to be given some special dispensation for technical quality. Can't see how that's fair or sensible. In general terms, the same techncial standard should apply to all shots (with the usual caveat of exceptions being made for rare/old subject matter)

Cheers,

Colin

Colin K. Work, Pixstel
 
KLAX
Posts: 1568
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:59 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Sat Apr 05, 2003 2:41 am

I think Colin is right, in all those shots, just some slight corrections, (not cutting off part of the plane, centering them etc...) would have turned them into outstanding shots! Big grin
Anyway, if they don't get on here there is are "other" sites  Smile

-Clovis
 
SkyGuy11
Posts: 532
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2001 7:09 am

RE: Gorgeous Shots.. What's Wrong?

Sat Apr 05, 2003 9:33 am

"These pictures are unmotivated, dark, grainy, and the subjects are common (read: boring)."

Well considering the subject of almost every photo on this site is the same I really don't understand how you can say that.

As for the motivation, I think these pictures have more, much more, than the standard 'hey look at this plane in my viewfinder with nothing but blue sky behind it!' shots. Yeah they are dark but they are artistic and add variety to this site. The problem is the basic compositional errors that are in a few of the shots.

Anyways, just a friendly opinion!
.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests