I am not complaining at all, but when I look through the "category" pictures linked on the front page, I find many inappropriate pictures (I think). This is certainly the case for the:
"Beautiful night / dusk / dawn shots" category (where many are taken in broad daylight), and the "Airport Overviews" category.
For instance (photographers please don't take offence):
These are fabulous airport overview pics:
Photo © Jeff Miller
Photo © Jan Aertgeerts
Are these really airport overviews...
Photo © Andreas Heilmann
Photo © Bernhard Dallner
... they look to me like pictures of aircraft taken at an airport (this criteria is also true for a quite a few in the db(!))
Can I (and/or others) volunteer to do some post-screener auditing of the categories, under the strict direction of Johan. My only desire here would be to improve the average quality of these categories.
Or is the job already being done well, and it's just my perspective which is wonky (badattitude?) ?!!
I'd be interested in your thoughts, and glad to help if I can.