Topic Author
Posts: 619
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2000 3:29 pm

Rejection Question.

Fri Aug 01, 2003 10:55 am


So I tried the composition photo I was looking to get, much like Bo's photos. It got rejected for bad distance, as I understand that the aircraft is in the distance a bit. But my point of the shot is clearly shown! I mean common, i see photos like this everyday in the DB with aircraft in the distance, that should be bad distance.

What is the reason behind mine? I mean, look at it. Can you understand the reasoning behind it? Im sure you can, as its another form of a shot trying to depict the aircraft and surroundings. Someone explain why some photos can be excepted that are distant aircraft shots and some can't. Is there somewhere that says certain ones can or can't?

Help please.

Here is the photo



Aaron Mandolesi
Denver, Colorado
Topic Author
Posts: 619
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2000 3:29 pm

RE: Rejection Question.

Fri Aug 01, 2003 10:58 am

As an example of a photo in the db that should be bad distance. Not knocking his photo or anything, because it is great, it is just he is focusing on whats around the aircraft and so am I, but I get rejected for it? Doesn't make sense to me. Im sure I can find more.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim Samples


Aaron Mandolesi
Denver, Colorado
Posts: 2981
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 10:32 am

RE: Rejection Question.

Fri Aug 01, 2003 11:00 am

Aaron, You showed me the photo a few hours ago, and I understood the artistic environment you were trying to pursue in your photo, and you did it, but I was sure (and I told you) that some screeners would NOT. If I was a screener, I'd see that besides only the aircraft, I also get a background, that's not only blue skies.

Fantastic shot, but I guess many can't understand that there is more to a great photo than the object itself.
I'd like to elect a president that has a Higher IQ than a retarted ant.
Posts: 3859
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2000 2:55 am

RE: Rejection Question.

Fri Aug 01, 2003 11:10 am

I think that it should have been accepted. The cloud picture is stunning, it emphasizes the aircraft surroundings, it is in the database and it is popular. The rejected shot should have been accepted too. The plane is closer, and downtown adds nicely to the picture. I also remember other pictures in the database from that location.

Awaiting the screeners' response.

Money does not bring you happiness. But it's better to cry in your own private limo than on a cold bus stop.
Posts: 6633
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 11:10 am

RE: Rejection Question.

Fri Aug 01, 2003 11:11 am

Aaron, thats a great pic. I'd love to see it (and others like it) in the database...good luck man.
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2000 1:54 am

RE: Rejection Question.

Fri Aug 01, 2003 11:44 am

Thats a nice shot Aaron; I can understand you giving it a try on getting accepted. But I wouldn't see it as a sure thing....its on the borderline of what gets accepted.

I wouldn't take the BadDistance rejection literally; its a screener judgement call. Though, I bet a 747 or A340 might be just enough to work from where you took that shot.

Well, take all that for what its worth. I'm not a screener, and I get plenty of rejections of my own.  Smile

User avatar
Posts: 596
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 8:19 am

RE: Rejection Question.

Fri Aug 01, 2003 12:44 pm


The aircraft looks like its stuck away to the right corner and its a little too light although the exposure looks okay. If some of the right hand side was cropped out to bring the aircraft nearer the center but not dead center I would like it better. Thats just my personal opinion.

Had the aircraft been lower in the frame I think it would have been accepted or at least by me anyway.

Good things take Time.
User avatar
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: Rejection Question.

Fri Aug 01, 2003 1:24 pm

That is a nice shot! I do kind of agree with Colin about it not being the center of attention though. In Tim's shot there is no doubt. That is about the only difference from my point of view.

Appeal that sucker.

Posts: 2031
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2001 2:33 pm

RE: Rejection Question.

Fri Aug 01, 2003 1:25 pm

It should be accepted in my opinion. Looks great to me, just like it did in person.

Mind you I could be biased since I was standing next to you when it was taken....but it's one hell of a photo.

If anything it should have been rejected for badhaze....damn smog, and smoke.
Mark McWhirter...Contrails Photography
User avatar
Posts: 2648
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2000 5:20 am

RE: Rejection Question.

Fri Aug 01, 2003 2:13 pm

Its a real nice shot Aaron.
But from my experience,these kinds of shots won't be added.
I have tried numerous times to get my own pictures added and the planes I captured were not mere A320s. They were PRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT (747 and IL96). Much larger and more SIGNIFICANT due to the fact that it carried a president for petes sake, but it was CONTINUOUSLY rejected by screeners for baddistance just like yours.

I really do not understand the logic behind this. Not all but SOME screeners add pictures such as the example you provided with more simpler backdrops while other more dynamic/appealing ones get rejected. Quite irrational if you ask me. Its like trying to show something different gives me nothing but the shaft. From the replies I have read I am more than convinced that the general populous agrees that such a photo is infact worthy of a add.

Its also funny to note how for other sites when I uploaded, these photos get added and the screener who added it even puts in a nice comment in the remark field of the email. Not to mention decent amounts of hits came along with it. So why won't the largest and most prestigious aviation site recognize what I have done?

So what if some technical rules are not met. There are whats called exceptions where guidelines can be broken for some special shots under certain circumstances.


Those are 3 examples. By the way, thanks for making such a post Aaron. I'll put you on my respected list since you love this type of shot from Calgary Smile
and your fighting for rationality.
Perhaps with some screeners gone and a whackload of new screeners, maybe this time these guys will have a different viewpoint and that may increase my chances of addition when I upload for the 1000th time.

My advice, keep trying! If there are some minor glitches which you can easily improve (perhaps reduce the effect of the haze in photoshop by adjusting a wee bit the curves or contrasts), do take the chance to make it that much a bit better. Then the shot should be unstoppable!
Follow @kimbo_snaps on Instagram or bokimon- on Flickr to see more pics of me and my travels.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos