cancidas
Posts: 3985
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 7:34 am

Picture Help Needed Again. :(

Wed Dec 24, 2003 11:04 am

can someone please tell me what is wrong with this picture?? i used no digital zoom to get it and the camera is 3.2 megapixels. i have appealed this picture twice already and continue to see nothing wrong with it.

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=187146
"...cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home."
 
manzoori
Posts: 1459
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2002 7:08 am

RE: Picture Help Needed Again. :(

Wed Dec 24, 2003 11:14 am

Rejected for Baddark by any chance?

Cheers!

Rez
 Big thumbs up
Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
 
2912n
Posts: 1978
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 2:12 pm

RE: Picture Help Needed Again. :(

Wed Dec 24, 2003 11:17 am

Too bright on that line over the US Airways..
Soft in parts, look at the tail, not very sharp.
 
fireguy274
Posts: 291
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 11:15 am

RE: Picture Help Needed Again. :(

Wed Dec 24, 2003 11:18 am

The Cockpit area is a little dark. Its a nice picture though. I get plenty of rejections myself.....Artie
 
benyhone
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2001 4:48 am

RE: Picture Help Needed Again. :(

Wed Dec 24, 2003 12:11 pm

The next time you try a photo like that, try waiting for the glare to pass by and get the aircraft registration visible. Hope that helps.

Terry/Cactus Wings
Cactus Wings Photography, Phoenix
 
2912n
Posts: 1978
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 2:12 pm

RE: Picture Help Needed Again. :(

Wed Dec 24, 2003 12:29 pm

What type of post processing program are you using?
 
Danny
Posts: 3714
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 3:44 am

RE: Picture Help Needed Again. :(

Wed Dec 24, 2003 1:13 pm

I would say badscan because of the noise on the sky. On the other side the fuelsage is still soft. Glare on the fuelsage is natural so I don't think that's the problem as well as registration not being visible.
Consider asking Santa for a new camera  Big grin

Daniel
 
cancidas
Posts: 3985
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 7:34 am

RE: Picture Help Needed Again. :(

Wed Dec 24, 2003 7:09 pm

how can a digital picture be badscan?!?!

i'm using photoshop elements 6.0
"...cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home."
 
Danny
Posts: 3714
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 3:44 am

RE: Picture Help Needed Again. :(

Wed Dec 24, 2003 7:43 pm

"how can a digital picture be badscan?!?! "

It very well can be - read description of badscan. Mainly when due to use of sharpening tools picture becomes grainy and noisy.

Daniel
 
SlamClick
Posts: 9576
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 7:09 am

RE: Picture Help Needed Again. :(

Thu Dec 25, 2003 1:29 am

It is a nice shot but I'd have to agree with "badscan" as defined here. The number IS visible. It is on the nosegear door. Just add "N" and "UW" With my F707 if I have a frame-filling shot like this the number on the gear door would be perfectly legible without any sharpening.

There is no photo problem that can't be exchanged for a better problem by buying more expensive gear.
Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests