Rotate
Topic Author
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 5:52 pm

Nikon 200 - 400 AFS VR F4

Thu Jan 15, 2004 6:39 pm

aloha guys,

sofar I am using the 80 - 400 AF VR for real tele around 300 to 400 ..... , I was thinking about buying this damn exspensive Nikon 200-400 AFS VR, cause I got pretty used to AFS on my 80 -200 2.8 from Nikon. Does anyone have used that 200 - 400? I know its exspensive, I know what various internet sites are saying, just corious,if there is any Nikon guy out there allready using that beauty? any help appreciated .......

cheerio robin
ABC
 
Guest

RE: Nikon 200 - 400 AFS VR F4

Thu Jan 15, 2004 7:48 pm

Used on a digital Nikon this lens would operate as a 300-600mm zoom.
I believe a 80-200 1:2.8 or 70-200 1:2.8 with a 1.4X or 2X teleconverter
is easier to use for aircraft photography. As you wrote, is't a very expen-
sive lens and very heavy. Most photographers will probably us a tripod to-
gether with this lens.
http://www.nikon-image.com/eng/news_release/2003/afs_vr200_400.htm

Anders
 
fallingeese
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2001 2:33 pm

RE: Nikon 200 - 400 AFS VR F4

Fri Jan 16, 2004 12:29 am

It was a nice little dent in my wallet when I bought my 80-400VR. I was looking at the 200-400VR at my camera shop out of curiousity, not that I can afford the $8000CAD price tag, it is a beast of a lens.
Mark McWhirter...Contrails Photography
 
jwenting
Posts: 9973
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2001 10:12 pm

RE: Nikon 200 - 400 AFS VR F4

Fri Jan 16, 2004 3:08 am

Haven't used it, and know noone who has.
Not only is it not yet on the market (or it wasn't last month) but the pricetag is just too high for me at almost €10000.

For that money I'd probably rather get a 70-200VR, a 2x TC, and a used 500mm f/4 AF-S.
I wish I were flying
 
chrisair
Posts: 1787
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2000 11:32 pm

RE: Nikon 200 - 400 AFS VR F4

Fri Jan 16, 2004 12:49 pm

I shot with a "pre-production" model back in October. If you think you can hand-hold that and point it at planes, you're very wrong. It weighs about as much as a 400 f/2.8 and that, I can hand hold for about 3 minutes before it goes crash.

Don't bother with this lens. Get a 2x and throw it on the 70-200.

 
PilotHighFlyer
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 8:48 am

RE: Nikon 200 - 400 AFS VR F4

Fri Jan 16, 2004 1:23 pm

I'm not sure what camera you use but, for my D100 the weight would be:
*Nikon 200 - 400 AFS VR F4 (300-600mm)
Lenes 7.2 lbs
Body 1.54 lb.
Grip 1.00
Battery (2) .32
10.06 pounds, Have fun hand holding that

*With 70-200VR (210-600mm)
Lenes 3.20 lb
Teleconverter: .782 lb.
Body 1.54 lb.
Grip 1.00
Battery (2) .32
6.482 pounds, Saving 3.578 lb.
I'd go with the 70-200 and a teleconverter

~Robert

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests