I will send Copenhagen airport a kind request to remove all obstacles close to the spottingpoints so we can make obstacle free pictures of the aircraft. Do you really think somebody is looking for the fence when he wants to see this picture in the large configuration?
I think it is the disadvantage of me to make pictures of aircraft on the runway or taxiway. And it is clear that not every airport has that much water surround than AMS
to avoid fences in sight of the spottingpoints. I like this kind of photography so you can actually see on what airport the pictures are taken. And due to the fact that I have no possibility to take pictures inside the perimeter of the airport or better at the ramp of the airport I have to be happy with a part of a fence sometimes.
I think I start making pictures of aircraft in the approach. Then it doesn't matter what airport you claim as location for your pictures. How can you check that a Airbus A320 of Lufthansa is in Paris, Madrid, London, Copenhagen or whatever.
Just one example: just placed in the database
It is only the 67th picture of this B747. Also with a fence at the foreground, half an engine on the picture and a lot of disturbing poles and buildings in the background.
Let me make clear this is only an example. I am happy for Stuart that his photo is added, but the reasons rejections sometimes give me a feeling that it depends on the taste of the screeners who will see the pictures. And I know that every picture is screened by several screeners so that is no excuse.
DAI - Dutch Aviation Images.