Topic Author
Posts: 195
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 8:35 pm

Bad Quality

Mon May 17, 2004 9:44 pm

My pic is rejected for bad quality!OK That doesn`t matter!!

I know it`s very hard to get pictures accept without a Digital camera but is this photo so bad!!

But why I see some shots which are recently uploaded like this!!

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank C. Duarte Jr.

Sometimes I`m in the wrong movie I guess!!

Maybe it`s better to upload 50 shots together to get a better chance!!!!!!!!

Sorry Frank to take your pic for this comparison!!!
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:07 pm

RE: Bad Quality

Mon May 17, 2004 9:57 pm

i guess because the picture you are metioning was taken in 1989, when nobody even knew about digital cameras  Big grin

standards are changing, thats the reason i think  Smile don´t worry
Posts: 373
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2002 1:52 am

RE: Bad Quality

Mon May 17, 2004 10:09 pm


Plain and simple: currently flying around vs. not around anymore --> high quality standard vs. lower quality standard. I am sure you are aware of this.

Would you think this one would have been accepted if it was still around today?

View Large View Medium

Photo © M.Oertle

Your Saab pic is on the grainy side, there are dirt marks on the tail (dust) and the forward fuselage is hot. All mentioded things can be fixed. I am sure that if you rework the original it has a very good chance of acceptance.
You do not need digital to get pics accepted here, just a be very critical during editing. Judging from your other pictures, you know how to do it!

Good luck


[Edited 2004-05-17 15:12:53]
Look very closely between the lines of this message, and you will see the captain beating up the jumpseater
Posts: 1577
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2000 7:10 am

RE: Bad Quality

Tue May 18, 2004 12:37 am

The whites on the fuselage look blown out and the sky is pretty grainy.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests