christhurtell
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:33 am

Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:39 pm

Im a little confused here. Surely this would constitute baddboule? No offence to Darren as he has taken some amazing shots, but this is one of the things that contributes to the queue being big


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Darren Howie



and


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Darren Howie



These two shots are obviously taken in sequence, if they are not I am more than happy to eat my words

So if i was to upload two shots of the same plane in sequence and they are of high quality will the be accepted? There is nothing special about this particular aircraft that i can see

Still good shots though

Chris
 
cancidas
Posts: 3985
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 7:34 am

RE: Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:46 pm

they're not the same shot. plain and simple.
"...cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home."
 
jderden777
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2000 9:56 am

RE: Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:57 pm

both great shots....these both are a lot better than a lot of the stuff that gets uploaded here...plus the vertical one is very unique, not a very common angle for a.net to say the least

so what's the problem?

jd
"my soul is in the sky" - shakespeare
 
MIA777
Posts: 1110
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 10:47 am

RE: Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:58 pm

The baddouble rule is a bit ambiguous. I think this is a baddouble because they were shot seconds apart and the only real difference in focal length. If he shot the plane from behind departing, it probably would not be bad double. Art Brett's MIA sequences cleared that up...
MIA777
 
N178UA
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2001 9:56 pm

RE: Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:59 pm

But I think Darren took the vertical shot horizontally  Big grin

Great stuff, having met Darren that day gave me lot of inspirations

Sam
For more of myself and my flight reviews visit http://www.SamChui.com
 
christhurtell
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:33 am

RE: Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 1:04 pm

im not too fussed about "how" shot was taken Sam. Its the fact they are almost in sequence, i mean, thats gotta be within say what, 5 seconds apart from each other off rwy25? I think Mia777 put across what i was trying to say a bit better

Chris
 
N178UA
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2001 9:56 pm

RE: Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 1:18 pm

Oh back to the topic, ummmm no baddouble was detected by me. No rules say you can't upload 2 pic taken within 5 seconds. Both shots were compeltely different, one horizontal and one vertical, one showing all wings and one shot only the body, great composition!  Smile

Sam
For more of myself and my flight reviews visit http://www.SamChui.com
 
PUnmuth@VIE
Posts: 3119
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 9:31 pm

RE: Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 1:26 pm

1.) Its in the database, so stop whining about. Which is against the forum rules by the way.
2.) Thos shots are for shure NOT the ones contributing to the big Q!
-
 
christhurtell
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:33 am

RE: Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 1:37 pm

great. so asking a question now has turned into whining

wonderfull. is it any wonder i dont bother frequenting these forums too often with responses like that
 
PUnmuth@VIE
Posts: 3119
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 9:31 pm

RE: Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 1:55 pm

but this is one of the things that contributes to the queue being big

Asking a question????
-
 
cancidas
Posts: 3985
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 7:34 am

RE: Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 2:08 pm

that first one reminds me of this shot:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mateusz Celmer



 Smile sorry for the shameless plug  Smile
"...cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home."
 
manzoori
Posts: 1459
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2002 7:08 am

RE: Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 2:17 pm

Chris,

The baddouble rule I believe applies when (for example) one snaps a dozen shots of the same aircraft in a sequence, or in the case described above if the photographer has shot it at rotation and then again at rotation + 1 second, +2 seconds, +3 seconds etc.

In this instance Darren may well have done that and many more besides but he has elected to submit the rotation shot (short-ish focal length, full width of the wings, landscape format) and a close-up of the nose gear retracting (longer focal length, portrait crop, concentrating on the nose and fuz only) resulting in two quite different images. So, IMHO this doesn't warrant a Baddouble rejection. Then again I'm not a screener so what do I know!  Wink/being sarcastic

Hope that helps!

Rez
 Big thumbs up
Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
 
christhurtell
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:33 am

RE: Baddouble?

Tue Aug 17, 2004 3:26 pm

thanks all, i was just curious

Chris

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests