As my previous post pointing out the inequities of A.net i will confine my self to saying its a great shot Martin and deserves a spot in the DB
I could agree with the bad dirty reject but badsize?
Here is a cut out from badsize info as the rest of the info does not pertain.
Another reason might be that your photo has a very
unusal size like for example square dimensions or a site ratio way below 3:2"
Well i am looking and this photo is not "way" below 3:2
I have had a couple of badsize rejects for similar reasons and by a similar margin and an explanation of what the "new" limits are for a badsize would be in order.
It is easy to define as a mathmatical number so for the benefit of us not wasting our valuable time uploading a photo to be rejected because it is 3 pixels to narrow.
So what are the min and max ratio limits for a photo to be accepted?
My personal opinion is "badsize" should not even be a reject item as long as the photo is composed correctly and well balanced in its look.
If you look through ANY book or magazine you will find the majority of photo's are or would be badsize rejects.
What purpose does it serve other than acting as a filter to limit the size of the DB