draigonair
Posts: 624
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 8:37 pm

Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sat Oct 09, 2004 5:30 pm

Hey guys

i just got some rejection i need some help with because i dont really understand them....

this one: Badmotiv

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=DElta1604nose.jpg

Bad camera angle:
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=USair762.jpg

Bad Common (i never took a pic like this)
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=MartinprinsberjunTAK02.jpg

Bad Info??
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=UNITED772towerbehind.jpg

ok i have no clue whats wrong with these pictures...

please help me

cheers
Nick
cheers
 
paulinbna
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:18 pm

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sat Oct 09, 2004 5:52 pm

The first one: I don't really know

The second one: Look at the yellow sign all the way to the left in front of the aircraft it is not level. CW rotation

Bad common means there are alot of this aircraft all ready in the database 128 to be exact. Which in my opinion should not matter. (just my opinion)  Smile/happy/getting dizzy  Smile/happy/getting dizzy  Smile/happy/getting dizzy  Smile/happy/getting dizzyas opposed to bad double which the same picture you uploaded.

Bad info: you do not have a reg number it is fairly easy to find out from what the reg number is from the number on the nose.

Hope this helps.

Paul
Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
 
draigonair
Posts: 624
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 8:37 pm

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sat Oct 09, 2004 5:58 pm

thnx,

yeh i tried to find the reg of that UA, but none of the plane in the database have a number ETOPS 2369...ill try and look....

cheers

Nick
cheers
 
QANTAS077
Posts: 5171
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 5:08 pm

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sat Oct 09, 2004 6:00 pm

bit rough with the Delta, the UA is awesome, just add the rego.
 
Lurch
Posts: 721
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:54 am

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sat Oct 09, 2004 6:08 pm

HI

The UNITED Code 2369 is from a 777-222 N769UA LN-12 C/N-26921.

The info came from my copy of AFQR by Air Britain.
 
draigonair
Posts: 624
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 8:37 pm

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sat Oct 09, 2004 6:10 pm

yeh cheers mate i found th reg also  Smile just had to figure out how the ETOPS was also part of the reg  Smile

also this is wierd

this one badcommon:
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=KLmoedteresaTAKnose.jpg

and then this (delta) bad motiv...
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=DElta1604nose.jpg


this one also bad common...
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=MartinprinsberjunTAK02.jpg

hah suggestions on what to do?

cheers

[Edited 2004-10-09 11:11:55]
cheers
 
Interpaul
Posts: 401
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 8:19 pm

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sat Oct 09, 2004 6:33 pm

The Martinair is a beautiful picture but the problem is this.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Lukas Kinneswenger
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Simon Willson



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Romailler Lionel
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jan Davidts



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alexander Jonsson
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Spijkers



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Wietse de Graaf - AirTeamImages
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Miguel Snoep



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Miguel Snoep
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ruud de Vries



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alexander Jonsson
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ramon Berk



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Florian Kondziela
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alexander Gregory



 Wink/being sarcastic
Jan
 
draigonair
Posts: 624
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 8:37 pm

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sat Oct 09, 2004 7:13 pm

yeh true...

tried to edit some, and some i didnt use again but this one...

what should i do with it?

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=DElta1604nose.jpg

just leave it or re-upload?

cheers
cheers
 
jderden777
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2000 9:56 am

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sun Oct 10, 2004 5:24 am

also that last one, the UA 777 might need to be rotated a bit CCW

jonathan d.

EDIT: nevermind i just saw your other thread about rotating the same picture....

[Edited 2004-10-09 22:25:32]
"my soul is in the sky" - shakespeare
 
Dazed767
Posts: 4967
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 11:55 am

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sun Oct 10, 2004 10:00 am

Nick, maybe the Martinair should have been baddouble becuase you already had a shot in the DB, but your second one is just a close up on departure. Just my opinion.
 
Rotate
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 5:52 pm

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sun Oct 10, 2004 11:01 am

aloha guys,

srry, but all pics are just okay! cant see anything, why there are not going into the DB. ok, the reg on the 777 from United shouldnt be a prob to get. rejections by new screener/in training? Appeal! the Delta Shoot is very nice and I really like it, but be aware, if its going to get accepted, it will be exactly 1 hrs before 24:00  Wow!

Robin
ABC
 
User avatar
clickhappy
Posts: 9042
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:10 pm

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sun Oct 10, 2004 11:48 am

1) Not so bad really, but this is one of those odd shots, more than just the nose, but not an entire airplane. I would reject it as badmotiv.

2) Needs some slight CCW rotation. I have to say, I am surprised you dont have the reg numbers of these planes, as you are pretty close to the action. How come?

3) Not too bad, but 125+ shots ahead of yours, it will take something pretty special to get in at this point. Just looking at the above thumbnails I see 6 images with more or less the same angle as yours.

4) Very unlevel. Also lots of evidence of chromatic abrasion with your lens. Of course its also missing the reg number.

 
spacecadet
Posts: 2788
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2001 3:36 am

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sun Oct 10, 2004 1:19 pm

1) Not so bad really, but this is one of those odd shots, more than just the nose, but not an entire airplane. I would reject it as badmotiv.

See, this is a travesty. Rejecting a shot just because it doesn't pigeonhole perfectly into one of the categories here. Out of all four of these shots, this is the one I couldn't stop looking at. It's rare to see a pic where you can see both the flying pilot and (maybe) some of the passengers, in flight.

4) Very unlevel. Also lots of evidence of chromatic abrasion with your lens.

(I'm guessing you mean "chromatic abberation".) I don't really see any purple fringing, except for one small spot of it where the landing gear intersects the white lamp-post; it's not really the type of shot that'd exhibit a lot of CA, though.

I do see over-sharpening. There are noticeable halo artifacts around almost everything, as well as extra noise throughout the image caused by over-sharpening. A simple rotation and less sharpening would improve this image.
I'm tired of being a wanna-be league bowler. I wanna be a league bowler!
 
tu154m
Posts: 610
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 4:52 am

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sun Oct 10, 2004 1:21 pm

The DL shot is cool. For god's sake....... you can see the condensation off the nose gear doors, the individual rivets with paint missing.......you can almost see the pilots big fat wallet!!!!!!! I think badmotiv is just a convienient rejection........that's a cool shot, no reason at all not to be added. In fact, they are all quite good. The bad double really blows too........that could apply to just about all aircraft here, especially special schemes and such.
S
CEOs should swim with cement flippers!
 
User avatar
clickhappy
Posts: 9042
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:10 pm

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:36 pm

How is it a travesty? I'm sharing my opinion, no need for drama  Smile

The good news is you can always appeal the shot, surely if it is good Johan will let it in.

And yes, I meant chromatic abberation. Thank you for pointing that out.
 
draigonair
Posts: 624
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 8:37 pm

RE: Hmm Not Too Sure About This ....

Sun Oct 10, 2004 6:02 pm

Hey guys

thnx for the info...wel the reason why i dont have the reg is that if its not shown in the photo i probably dont know  Smile Im just 18 and i only take the photos, and dont keep a log...ill offcourse do my best to get the reg. For the UA772 i got the reg and re-upload...I will put the Delta in the Appeal or should i re-upload? appeal right?

thanks for the info guys real great help Big grin

cheers!

Nick

btw today is my 4th year as memeber at a.net Big grin ahah i was 14 when i joined :P
cheers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests