pepef
Topic Author
Posts: 412
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:12 pm

A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:07 pm

I remember reading concerns, voiced by the participants of this forum, that the screening crew could manipulate the photographers viewcount, by simply uploading the photo at an inopportune time.

Mainly by uploading the photo just before midnight Swedish time. Now I for one do not believe for a second that this could be true and am saddened the subject was ever brought up.

So, to absolve the screeners of all doubt, I thought of this thread.

If you think your best photos are always uploaded just before midnight, post the email "sent" and "received" times here.

If the same names crop up over and over, then maybe the screeners might find this thread helpful and make sure the said person might sometimes get better upload times.



[Edited 2004-10-25 16:32:50]
 
pepef
Topic Author
Posts: 412
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:12 pm

RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:11 pm

Sent 24.10.2004 23:57  Big grin
Received 24.10.2004 23.57

-Pepef-
 
sulman
Posts: 1963
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 5:09 am

RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:31 pm

"Now I for one do believe for a second that this could be true and am saddened the subject was ever brought up.".

Now there's a Freudian slip.


It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
 
pepef
Topic Author
Posts: 412
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:12 pm

RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:33 pm

Thanks Sulman, I corrected that.

-pepef-
 
Skymonster
Posts: 3428
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2001 7:53 pm

RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

Tue Oct 26, 2004 12:05 am

Peter,

Lets just clarify things a little - it is true that, for any given picture, the likelihood is that the picture will get more hits if it makes it onto the database just after Swedish midnight than it will if it goes on just before Swedish midnight. The reason for this is that each picture appears in the "Most popular of last 24/48 hours" view on the calendar day on which it is accepted, and the following day, based on Swedish time. It is clear therefore that a picture that makes it onto the database at 23:59 Swedish time will be in this view for 24 hours and one minute, whereas a picture that makes it onto the database at 00:01 Swedish time (two minutes later) will appear in that view for 47 hours and 59 minutes. As many site visitors appear to use this view to look at new uploads, it follows that pictures posted just after Swedish midnight are in view for almost twice as long as those posted just before Swedish midnight.

Of course, NOTHING will get an all-so-ran picture views - the most part of getting views is uploading a good original picture - a really GOOD picture will get viewed plenty anyway, and in my opinion this before/after midnight thing is just a crutch that some folks with marginal images try to cling to, to justify hit counts lower than they hoped for.

Now, to understand the screening process - It is of course a fact that a.net has screeners from Europe, the US, and Australia (at least). Swedish midnight is of course midnight across most of western Europe, its 23:00 in the UK, 18:00 on the US east coast, and 14:00 on the US west coast. It is something like 09:00 in eastern Australia. So, notwithstanding the fact that we don't fish specific people's pictures out of the queue, it is of course obvious that there is a vast conspricy going on - by habit the screeners in Europe mainly screen just before they go to bed, screeners in the eastern US screen just after they leave work, screeners on the west coast screen in the early afternoon, and screeners in Australia screen after they get up in the morning. And we do this, each group works at different times of the day, with the express intention of upsetting those few photographers who seem to think hits are everything by processing their pictures at the most inopportune time.

----

YEAH, RIGHT - NOT! In reality its a lottery as pictures are presented in a system determined order which screeners don't influence. Or, to put it another way - if anyone thinks that there's a conspiracy going on amongst the screeners, just to cheat a few photographers out of a few hits, then their energy would be better directed towards getting out more and spending more time taking really good pictures, than it is worrying about whether anyone here will see them.

Andy
There are old pilots and there are bold pilots, but there are no old bold pilots
 
User avatar
JeffM
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

Tue Oct 26, 2004 12:21 am

"So, to absolve the screeners of all doubt, I thought of this thread."

Unbelievable is the only thing that comes to mind.
 
Rotate
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 5:52 pm

RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

Tue Oct 26, 2004 12:32 am

aloha,

I ve brought up that topic several times. I ve got never any support from anyone, I ve came up with solutions ! instead I was bashed by screeners, forummoderators and my kind friends, which I entitle plugmasters ..... , I only have to look into my emialbox - 80% of my last 75 uploads have been accepted 3 hrs or less before midnight!!! - BUT ITS ALL BADLUCK- YEAH, OF COURSE!!!

robin

ps: and now , pls bash me again and yell at me .....
ABC
 
mirage
Posts: 3612
Joined: Mon May 31, 1999 4:44 am

RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

Tue Oct 26, 2004 12:35 am

"...the most part of getting views is uploading a good original picture - a really GOOD picture will get viewed plenty anyway..."

I used to belive in this but it's obvious there are other factors: time of upload and number of uploaded photos. I have good original pictures uploaded 30 minutes before midnight in days when were uploaded +1500 photos, obviously my picture was dissolved and received a "low" number of views.

I'm not complaining, I'm not asking nothing, just telling facts and accepting the system, because this was brought up.

Luis
 
willo
Posts: 1331
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 10:21 pm

RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

Tue Oct 26, 2004 12:37 am

Skymonster you've shattered another illusion I had of a.net. I thought the screeners all got up at 00.00 Swedish time to pick the days best shots from the queue. I better add this to the conspiracy theory list of why my shots get added evening time GMT:
  • I only upload a couple of shots at a time so they get screened after the big batches.

  • I'm not a big name

  • My surname begins with "S", so I'm near the end

  • I only shoot GA/Helicopters and people aren't interested (and judging by my hit rate they're not!)


  •  Nuts

    Seriously I couldn't give a stuff about what time they are added. Once the pictures are in the database they will sink or swim on their own merit.


    [Edited 2004-10-25 17:58:11]
     
    SA006
    Posts: 1818
    Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 3:28 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 1:17 am

    My surname begins with "S", so I'm near the end

    We screen alphabetically now?

    Rgds
    SA006
    Proudly South African
     
    User avatar
    airkas1
    Crew
    Posts: 5953
    Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 1:34 am

    Read carefully:

    I better add this to the conspiracy theory list
    Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
     
    User avatar
    Tonimr
    Posts: 269
    Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2001 4:32 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 1:40 am

    I ve came up with solutions !

    I think there must be a problem to give solutions.

    Why do you think the number of hits it's so important?

    Do you REALLY think that we pick up somebody's photos after 0:00 to give them some extra hits and some other's just before to ruin their numbers?

    80% of my last 75 uploads have been accepted 3 hrs or less before midnight!!! - BUT ITS ALL BADLUCK- YEAH, OF COURSE!!!

    Do you know other contributor's stats?

    Most of my photos are ALSO screened between 23:00 and 0:00, so what? maybe some screener wants me bad? or all of them?

    We are VERY BUSY to lose time doing things like that and to defend ourselves from unfounded charges.

    There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'.
     
    ake0404ar
    Posts: 2383
    Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 10:55 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:36 am

    " the most part of getting views is uploading a good original picture - a really GOOD picture will get viewed plenty anyway,"

    Might be true, but check this out......


    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © Mario Aurich
    View Large View Medium
    Click here for bigger photo!

    Photo © Sam Chui



    The first one was uploaded before midnight and the second one was uploaded after midnight and therefore is staying longer in the 24/48 hrs queue

    A difference in hits 3000 and counting....later on a difference in 20000 hits, since it will be the picture of the day.

    The flight deck shot did pretty good (about 2500 hits) for a 25 hrs life. If it had been uploaded after midnight, I am pretty certain that it would have been right on top!

    Vasco




     
    Rotate
    Posts: 1448
    Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 5:52 pm

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:05 am

    at Tonimr: you are getting me wrong ....

    why does A.net not just put up a kind of 12 accepting times to get rid of that discussion? say the last bunch gets accepted at 20:00 or 21:00 ? and then at 00:01 we put those in , which got accepted between 21:00 and 24:00 ?

    btw: also once again: I DONT GIVE S____ ABOUT VIEWS, otherwise I would plug, load up only windowshots , cockpitshoots, etc, etc ... , I just want that everybody is treated equal. A.net came up with that 24-48 hrs , and all these static features, which I actually like, but there are not very exact - AND THIS IS MY POINT!

    as soon you screeners read something like this, you allways think its against you -NO - it is not!

    Robin

    PS: I am out of here ... , wont take action in the forum for the next months ..., cheers

    ABC
     
    mirage
    Posts: 3612
    Joined: Mon May 31, 1999 4:44 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:21 am

    I don't agree with different upload times, that's a kind of getting "paranoiac" about it.

    What I don't agree also is the idea that good photos will be viewed, that's naif and in reality it doesn't work that way.

    Does this photo deserves 629 views?

    View Large View Medium

    Photo © Luis Rosa


    I never say I have good photos, I never write pretentious remarks of how good and sharp my photos are, I leave that always to the viewer to decide, but in this case I know this photo deserves more than 629 views.

    Luis

    [Edited 2004-10-25 20:29:18]
     
    User avatar
    Tonimr
    Posts: 269
    Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2001 4:32 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:38 am

    Robin, nothing against you but...

    why does A.net not just put up a kind of 12 accepting times to get rid of that discussion?

    Maybe because there are a lot of important things to do? Anyway, you can send your suggestion to the admins...

    and all these static features (.....) but there are not very exact - AND THIS IS MY POINT!

    Numbers should be taken as they are: number of views=xxxx, if you know the method how they've been calculated, they are exact. The problem arises when someone tries to measure the quality or interest of a photograph by these means...

    As per the screeners attitude, the name of this topic is self explanatory.  Big grin
    There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'.
     
    mikephotos
    Posts: 2888
    Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2000 12:52 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:48 am

    Great shot Luis, certainly deserved my hit...now 630  Smile

    I've learned that high hits doesn't always = good (spectacular) photo. For example, Sam's shot listed above by Vasco. There's nothing overly "great" about it photo-wise but it is very interesting to viewers, overviews tend generate large hits. No disrespect meant to Sam or the photo itself, I think you guys know what I mean.

    Personally I don't pay much attention to hits. That's why you'll still see tons of plain old boring 50mm side on uploads from me, I personally find them more interesting. But that's me. Some people prefer to upload hit-generating photos only, that's cool also. If we all uploaded the same type of shots it would be pretty boring.

    Now I just gotta find a way to get my uploads accepted at 1201am  Big grin

    Mike

    [Edited 2004-10-25 20:49:27]
     
    spencer
    Posts: 1518
    Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 8:30 pm

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:52 am

    Luis, in a word, yes, your MON shot deserves more, a lot more.
    Spencer.
    EOS1D4, 7D, 30D, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, 70-200/2.8 L IS2 USM, 17-40 f4 L USM, 24-105 f4 L IS USM, 85 f1.8 USM
     
    mirage
    Posts: 3612
    Joined: Mon May 31, 1999 4:44 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:54 am

    I really don't care that much about views, if I did I would have "imploded" a long time ago. But I'm not blind, I visit this website every single day, I see the kind of photos that are listed on the most popular section, and I'm not a machine, I have my own behave.

    Luis
    P.S. thanks Mike and Spencer, I don't want claps in my back but appreciate it.

    [Edited 2004-10-25 21:05:16]
     
    ake0404ar
    Posts: 2383
    Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 10:55 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 4:33 am

    Luis,

    you definitely deserve a pat on your back.
    Your work to say the least is stunning. Don't know why, but if this was a "SC @ LAX shot" it would have been top of the 24/48hrs section....for sure.

    That shot is a killer!!!!!!!
    647 and counting..........

    Vasco
     
    LHSebi
    Posts: 1007
    Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 4:24 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 4:45 am

    Awesome Luis! I have admired your shots for a while, and this is certainly no exception! Nice going!

    Sebastian
    I guess that's what happens in the end, you start thinking about the beginning.
     
    mirage
    Posts: 3612
    Joined: Mon May 31, 1999 4:44 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 4:50 am

    Please guys, I appreciate it but it's not my wish to turn this topic into a "congratulate me" thing.

    Luis
     
    Bronko
    Posts: 795
    Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2001 3:28 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 4:56 am

    Peter, if you are wondering why your Finnair cockpit shots are getting the hits like they used to, it is NOT because of the time they are being added to the DB....
    Jet City Aviation Photography
     
    TZ
    Posts: 908
    Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 9:21 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:30 am

    Ok, ok. We've been caught with our trousers-down. We do have what we screeners call "the list".

    The list comes into play at 23:00 and 00:00 (Swedish time). Here's how it works - we can add names to the List and give them a positive or a negative points score. If the total points are negative, then the photographer gets their pictures screened at 23:00, positive points totals get their photos screened at 00:00. The higher the points score in either direction, the closer to exactly midnight the screening is done.

    It's entirely up to screeners discretion who they put on the list and there is no voting or justification needed. It's really used where we feel we need to get "our own back" on photographers because we're quite an unhappy and uncharitable bunch behind the scenes.

    We maintain the positive list solely for people who say nice things about us in the forums, irrespective of the quality of their photographs.

    Oh, and we store the list safely in our black-helicopter parked up on the grassy knoll. Or did we film it all in hangar in the desert?

    Tamsin (a.net screening crew)

    [Edited 2004-10-25 22:34:21]
    TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images
     
    pepef
    Topic Author
    Posts: 412
    Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:12 pm

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:48 am

    I know you're lying Tamsin. I know for a fact that the helicopter is blue.

    -pepef-
     
    diezel
    Posts: 622
    Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 6:50 pm

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 5:50 am

    Now Tamsin told us about the List I can finally tell my little secret too:

    I'm encoding my pictures with special pixels, so that when a screener looks at the picture, a message gets programmed into his head: --I must upload this picture at 1 minute past midnight--.

    Those bad, bad screeners can be beaten after all!

    Roel (a.net photog hit hunter)
    Never be afraid of what you like. (Miles Davis)
     
    Sukhoi
    Posts: 1561
    Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:03 am

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:13 am

    Luis,

    Its a MON 752 thats your problem  Wink/being sarcastic It might be a good shot but for most the subject doesnt make it worth looking at, now if it was a UAL 744......

    Wish my fellow Screeners would accept some of my shots in the viewing hour Big grin

    Cheers

    Paul
     
    User avatar
    clickhappy
    Posts: 9044
    Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:10 pm

    RE: A Thread To Prove The Screeners Are Fair

    Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:41 am

    dont forget to count and post your rejection emails, too.

    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

    Popular Searches On Airliners.net

    Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

    Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

    Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

    Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

    Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

    Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

    Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

    Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

    Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

    Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

    Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

    Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

    Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

    Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

    Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos