A319114
Topic Author
Posts: 520
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 9:40 pm

Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 6:31 am

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=lvl_lnrcw.jpg

I'm not a type to whine, but I can't see how this pic is badblury? Should I appeal or is it really badblury. I'm not questioning the expertise of the screeners, but I just don't understand it. Looks perfectly sharp to me...
Destruction leads to a very rough road but it also breeds creation
 
IL76
Posts: 2237
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 5:43 am

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 6:43 am

Looks like an image straight out of the camera (i.e. apart from resizing no editing done). It doesn't look all that sharp, either due to bad focus or camera movement.
Eduard
 
mygind66
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 7:13 am

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:08 am

..

Titles in vertical stabilizer and left engine look no sharp enough.
I think the reason is correct I'm afraid..

Just my opinion..

Enrique
 
LHSebi
Posts: 1007
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 4:24 am

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:19 am

Indeed blurry...go into photoshop, and apply some USM. I tried it, and it helps a little, but I do believe it's blurred, not just unsharp, since even after the USM, it keeps some of the blurryness (is that a word? Big grin). Anyhow, nice shot!

Sebastian
I guess that's what happens in the end, you start thinking about the beginning.
 
PH-BFA
Posts: 444
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2002 6:22 pm

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:33 am

I think it is a great pic and feel it would be a shame if not accepted. I really really don't understand the course airliners.net is heading at the moment. If they really only want 'perfect' shots they should start removing those 'crappy' (no offense to the photographers concerned) pics who are here since the beginning of the website when acceptance standards were low. Just my opinion,

PH-BFA
 
User avatar
clickhappy
Posts: 9042
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:10 pm

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:41 am

I think it is a great pic and feel it would be a shame if not accepted

The shot is blurry. Who's fault is that? Let me give you a hint...it isn't the screeners fault.

It is a shame, because it could have been a great shot. Practice your panning technique and next time you'll get a great shot.
 
PH-BFA
Posts: 444
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2002 6:22 pm

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:46 am

'The shot is blurry. Who's fault is that? Let me give you a hint...it isn't the screeners fault.'

Sure it isn't, I won't argue about that. But I do think that the screeners are not the only ones who view the photos of the database, but the regular visitors are. The regular visitors do not even notice these small flaws in a picture (which the well trained eye of a screener does). I think screeners do a great job, but I hope they keep in mind that not only photographers look at the pictures in the database, but also normal people, like me, who think this is a great shot.

PH-BFA
 
DLKAPA
Posts: 7962
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 10:37 am

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 8:02 am

My humble opinion is even if the shot was up to quality, It still goes down as BadCommon. Not a very interesting subject and overphotographed.
And all at once the crowd begins to sing: Sometimes the hardest thing and the right thing are the same
 
User avatar
clickhappy
Posts: 9042
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:10 pm

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 8:10 am

A blurry photo isn't a "small flaw." We don't need to settle for lesser quality photos when we have 100's of good ones accepted everyday.
 
LHRSIMON
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 5:59 am

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 8:33 am

Agree with Royal.... Its not up to the pass standard as its just not sharp enough... Sorry just my 2 pence worth  Smile
Canon 1D Mk III,Canon 20D+17-40 L f4.0,70-200 L IS USM f2.8,400 L USM f5.6,135 mm L f2.0, 50 mm f1.8,1.4 x II extender
 
mdl21483
Posts: 157
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:55 am

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 1:35 pm

"I think screeners do a great job, but I hope they keep in mind that not only photographers look at the pictures in the database, but also normal people, like me, who think this is a great shot."

Being one of the (formerly) "normal people" and a hopeful new photographer on here, I'd throw out there the possibility of resizing the picture to a smaller size, while increasing the pixels-per-inch ratio accordingly. Another thing that sticks out is how the horizontal stabilizer obstructs a good view of the tail logo. As far as blurry goes, the most blurred part appears around the wing root, especially the text on the engines, so maybe that's it right there... A.net is pretty high on aesthetics, especially since whenever there's a breaking news air incident on CNN, they seem to turn to either Associated Press, or (moreso) Airliners for the visuals.

~Melanie~
From the shores of the sea we have come afar, we have risen high, among the stars.
 
User avatar
Kereru
Posts: 596
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 8:19 am

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 3:20 pm

I think screeners do a great job, but I hope they keep in mind that not only photographers look at the pictures in the database, but also normal people, like me, who think this is a great shot.

We are normal people until we become screeners? Huh? Ahh my wife is right all these years I am not normal people!  Wink/being sarcastic

Cheers,
Colin

PS (Just kidding no offence intended)
Good things take Time.
 
Bronko
Posts: 795
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2001 3:28 am

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:09 pm

Comprising quality will not help you become a better photographer. Is your goal to get a few hits off a sub par shot or is it to become a better photographer?



Note: Comment not directed at the OP, but those who think this site is becoming to strict.
Jet City Aviation Photography
 
A319114
Topic Author
Posts: 520
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 9:40 pm

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 5:04 pm

Well actually I'll already added some sharpness but obviously not enough. I've now added some more as you can see an this pic:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v475/frontierflight/lvl_lnrcw.jpg

Do you think I should upload this or will this really go down as badcommon, as DLKAPA said.
Destruction leads to a very rough road but it also breeds creation
 
LHSebi
Posts: 1007
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 4:24 am

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:16 pm

It's a bit better, but as I mentioned before, it is blurry, and no amount of USM will change that. It seems as though perhaps you were using a low f number, or it was just not in focus when you made that shot. Sorry, but I would just keep this one for your personal album.

Sebastian
I guess that's what happens in the end, you start thinking about the beginning.
 
andrewuber
Posts: 2142
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:45 am

RE: Is This Really Badblury?

Sat Nov 06, 2004 3:13 am

Why do people insist on uploading "common" shots in 1200 wide resolution???

A319-

If you reduce the size to 1024x wide, and add one or two passes of mild USM, I guarantee it will make it into the database. As has been discussed before a zillion times, 1024 wide is the way to go - unless you have something really extraordinary (like perhaps the first A380 visit to Meigs???). 1200 wide will only enhance the blurriness of a photo, and it makes any flaws much bigger and much easier to see. Plus, I'd be willing to bet Royal would confirm this - but I would imagine the standards are slightly higher for accepting 1200 or 1600 wide photos.

Reduce it, USM it, re-upload it. Then plug it.  Big thumbs up

Drew
I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests