|Quoting Staffan (Reply 2):|
Probably because different screeners looked at it and had different opinions about it.
Probably not. We try hard to list every reason why an image is rejected with every screening. However, often with badinfo (or badcategory) the image will sometimes be rejected quickly without an in-depth analysis of the image. Two reasons for this: one it does save some time allowing us to screen more, and secondly it's a simple thing which all uploaders should be getting right, so we consider a quick rejection is appropriate (sometimes).
We try to list all reasons all times, but the world isn't perfect and we don't have all the time in the world, so sometimes that doesn't happen.
So, it was really only rejected once. You state "it passed first screening"... that is a little misleading. There isn't really a "first screening" stage at all - it simply means it had received one HQ
from at least one screener. But that HQ
mark may have carried comments to the other screeners, maybe to look out for doubles, questions about quality, etc.
It therefore is unreasonable to say that there were any screeners whos thoughts were opposite to the decision.
Tamsin (a.net screening crew)