paulinbna
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:18 pm

Bad Info Reject

Thu May 05, 2005 3:30 am

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...photo.main?filename=747UA_3206.jpg

I really have no idea why this was rejected for bad info. I used N***UA for the reg. as in the instructions that where given by Sam Chui in another thread about not knowing the whole reg.

Any screener care to answer please.

Oh and by the way before some one says how could a sunset last two hours. Well we were about 40 miles south of the north pole.  Smile  Smile
Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
 
Tameteora
Crew
Posts: 208
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:41 pm

RE: Bad Info Reject

Thu May 05, 2005 3:42 am

Quoting Paulinbna (Thread starter):
I really have no idea why this was rejected for bad info.

Perhaps because screeners do not believe in time travel?  Wink

Aad.
 
User avatar
Bruce
Posts: 4934
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 2:46 am

RE: Bad Info Reject

Thu May 05, 2005 4:36 am

Uhhhh..... Its not October yet.

PLus, when you re upload shouldn't the reg be N1**UA? I believe that all UA 744's are in the 100 range.

bruce
Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
 
Tameteora
Crew
Posts: 208
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 10:41 pm

RE: Bad Info Reject

Thu May 05, 2005 5:55 am

Quoting Tameteora (Reply 1):
Perhaps because screeners do not believe in time travel?

Just to make sure: my remark refers to the photo date of October 11, 2005 and not to the sunset lasting 2 hours...  Smile

Quoting Bruce (Reply 2):
when you re upload shouldn't the reg be N1**UA?

Yes, it should, but I don't think that was the rejection reason.

Aad.
 
paulinbna
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:18 pm

RE: Bad Info Reject

Thu May 05, 2005 12:50 pm

Thanks to every one. I will re upload it and not have the time travel.
Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests