paulinbna
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:18 pm

Another Bad Category Rejection.

Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:30 pm

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/Mustang_5608.jpg

I selected warbird as a category is that not right?
Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
 
QantasA332
Posts: 1473
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 5:47 pm

RE: Another Bad Category Rejection.

Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:43 pm

Did you also select "single engine prop"?

-Gabriel
 
PUnmuth@VIE
Posts: 3119
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 9:31 pm

RE: Another Bad Category Rejection.

Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:45 pm

Warbird is correct but. BUT, on the upload confirmation page there is a frame titled The most visible aircraft on this photo is a:
Helicopter, Blimp/Airship/balloon, Single engine Prop, Glider, Airliner or Other

The category PROP should have been checked also.

Exactly this unneccesary rejections because of obvious errors made me post this thread  Wow! Screener Request On Categories (by PUnmuth@VIE May 24 2005 in Aviation Photography)

Hope this helps
Peter
-
 
ua777222
Posts: 2987
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 11:23 am

RE: Another Bad Category Rejection.

Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:47 pm

Wouldn't it be preserved as well?

Thanks,

Matt
"It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark."
 
QantasA332
Posts: 1473
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 5:47 pm

RE: Another Bad Category Rejection.

Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:48 pm

The "preserved" category only applies to non-flying aircraft...

Cheers,
Gabriel
 
paulinbna
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:18 pm

RE: Another Bad Category Rejection.

Fri Jun 03, 2005 3:58 pm

Peter I did not even think about the single engine prop thing.

Thanks

Paul
Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
 
User avatar
Bruce
Posts: 4934
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 2:46 am

RE: Another Bad Category Rejection.

Fri Jun 03, 2005 4:01 pm

single engine prop! Wow, I never thought of that!

bruce
Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
 
PUnmuth@VIE
Posts: 3119
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 9:31 pm

RE: Another Bad Category Rejection.

Fri Jun 03, 2005 4:07 pm

Quoting Paulinbna (Reply 5):
Peter I did not even think about the single engine prop thing



Quoting Bruce (Reply 6):
e engine prop! Wow, I never thought of that!

RTFM  Wink
-
 
TZ
Posts: 908
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 9:21 am

RE: Another Bad Category Rejection.

Fri Jun 03, 2005 8:34 pm

Quoting QantasA332 (Reply 4):
The "preserved" category only applies to non-flying aircraft...

Actually it also applied to airworthy aircraft which are located inside a museum. This is a frequent occurence at Duxford, where the maintenance hangars form part of the museum.

However, Warbirds which are outside the museum are not to be listed as "Preserved", like you said.

Tamsin
TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests