WhyWhyZed
Topic Author
Posts: 891
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:40 pm

Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 5:18 am

Sorry for adding to the long list of topics questioning the rejections, but I was wondering what the screener was going by...

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...in?filename=cfzqsyyz052205jay2.jpg

Thanks for your help in advance
- Jason DePodesta
 
Interpaul
Posts: 401
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 8:19 pm

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 5:25 am

Needs some CW rotation, I'd say.

Cheers.
Jan
 
INNflight
Posts: 3526
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:11 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 5:27 am

Taking the vertical white line at the right as reference, 0.7degrees CW rotation would be needed.

Florian
Jet Visuals
 
ChrisH
Posts: 1120
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 4:25 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 5:43 am

No rotation needed imo. Lines straight here. However plane is off-center and maybe you forgot to check hybrid-category?
what seems to be the officer, problem?
 
Fly747
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:03 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 5:53 am

I would go with what Florian said. Rotate it according to the vertical line underneath the right wing tip.

Ivan
 
INNflight
Posts: 3526
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:11 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 6:11 am

Quoting ChrisH (Reply 3):
No rotation needed imo. Lines straight here

Chris, they are not actually. The white lightpole and the line on the right are leaning to the left, hence the badcameraangle rejection.
The references on the left have a 'vertical' impression because they are too short. If they'd be longer ( like the right reference line ) you'd see the photo is not level.

cheers,
Florian
Jet Visuals
 
ChrisH
Posts: 1120
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 4:25 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 6:29 am

I would have thought of this as passable, usually better to measure verticals at the center of the image.
what seems to be the officer, problem?
 
User avatar
Jofa
Posts: 310
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 9:50 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 6:38 am

verticals look straight to me a well.
 
Airplanepics
Posts: 2590
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 4:12 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 6:41 am

The verticals are fine. If anything it needs a slight CW rotation.
Simon - London-Aviation.com
 
TZ
Posts: 908
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 9:21 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 7:25 am

Verticals in the RH 2/2 of image are out.

Definately needs a slight CW rotation, but don't overdo it.

Tamsin
TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images
 
WhyWhyZed
Topic Author
Posts: 891
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:40 pm

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 8:46 am

Thanks for the help. This is another example of the difference between screeners, which is fine, but can be difficult at times  Silly ... I'll fix it right away, and re-upload it. Thanks again!

- Jason DePodesta

[Edited 2005-06-05 01:55:33]
 
PUnmuth@VIE
Posts: 3119
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 9:31 pm

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 3:38 pm

Quoting WhyWhyZed (Reply 10):
This is another example of the difference between screeners,

Which difference? 1 screener answered  Wink
-
 
INNflight
Posts: 3526
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:11 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 4:41 pm

Quoting WhyWhyZed (Reply 10):
This is another example of the difference between screeners,

Hm don't get this either...
For leveling see reply #2  Wink
Jet Visuals
 
toptag
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:14 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Sun Jun 05, 2005 5:16 pm

The pic looks fine for me.

Now let's talk turkey ... I wonder why there's not more tolerance with these level things ... we'll all end up blind because of staring into our monitors to level the pics to 1/100 deg ...

 white 

Digital GreetinX
Andreas
Digital GreetinX
 
WhyWhyZed
Topic Author
Posts: 891
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:40 pm

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Mon Jun 06, 2005 6:39 am

Well... I believe it was one of them in one of a few batches that made it past the first screening, so therefore at least 2 screeners, screened it, and I'm not sure whether Tamsin, was one of them.

- Jason DePodesta
 
JeffM
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Mon Jun 06, 2005 6:43 am

Quoting Toptag (Reply 13):
I wonder why there's not more tolerance with these level things ...

Simple, because it is one thing that can always be fixed correctly.
 
WhyWhyZed
Topic Author
Posts: 891
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:40 pm

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:17 am

Just for an update... How would this go, or should I level it more?

http://www.wwspotters.com/cfzqsyyzjay.jpg

- Jason DePodesta
 
Jan Mogren
Posts: 2014
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2000 2:47 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Wed Jun 08, 2005 1:39 am

Now everything is leaning to the right.

/JM
AeroPresentation - Airline DVD's filmed in High Definition
 
WhyWhyZed
Topic Author
Posts: 891
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:40 pm

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:19 am

GRRRR... Ok, I leveled the white line under the bottom of the right wing. What are you going by? I've never had such a problem before!

- Jason DePodesta
 
Jan Mogren
Posts: 2014
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2000 2:47 am

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:40 am

Just the overall feel from looking at it. Try somewhere in between.

/JM
AeroPresentation - Airline DVD's filmed in High Definition
 
WhyWhyZed
Topic Author
Posts: 891
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:40 pm

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:46 pm

Ok can ANYONE please rotate it for me, and send me the rotated version to jason.depodesta@gmail.com or just post here. You can even tell me how much to rotate it by. I'd love to see this shot in my A.net collection, and I believe it meets the sites standards. Thanks for all the help!!

Here's the original...
http://www.wwspotters.com/IMG_1990.JPG

- Jason DePodesta
 
jettrader
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2001 5:19 pm

RE: Badcameraangle... Going By?

Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:00 pm

Ok...while we're on the subject I'll jump into this debate.

I have this in the queue :-



The tower is pretty vertical but the stair housing to the right is obviously not (and in reality is not at all vertical anyway) - my question is this - How do screeners look on this kind of shot where some "verticals" are less vertical than others?

I added a "note to the screeners" when I uploaded it but would appreciate any thoughts from anyone with an opinion.

Regards,
Dean / JT
Life's dangerous. Get a f**king helmet!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests