Fly747
Topic Author
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:03 am

Is Canon 75-300mm Is That Much Better?

Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:04 am

Currently I have the Canon 75-300mm USM and am thinking about upgrading to the one with IS. Does the IS lens produce far better images than the other one? Is the IS lens also soft at full focal length? I would like your opinions and experiences. I know some of you would suggest I should probably go with 70-200L lens but I don't want to spend more money right now. I'd rather buy a 400mm L lens down the road. Thanks for your feedback.

Ivan
 
JAT74L
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 5:37 pm

RE: Is Canon 75-300mm Is That Much Better?

Mon Jun 06, 2005 2:29 am

Ivan,
The IS version is good for still shots in less than perfect light but, for moving aircraft then the switchable IS axis mode of the 100-400L IS is unbeatable in my book.

Regards

John
I like trains just as much as planes but trains don't like the Atlantic!
 
Paulianer
Posts: 866
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:15 pm

RE: Is Canon 75-300mm Is That Much Better?

Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:13 am

Ivan,

I had both lenses... And to be honest, quality wise I liked the non IS version much more... I don't found the IS useful, because it didn't work while panning... I sometimes had the feeling the results were even worse with IS switch on... Although for non aviation and static stuff it was quite nice, especially in low light...

I now have the 70-200 L, that's a whole different story  Wink

Cheers
Tobi
Tobias Rose - Hamburg (HAM/EDDH) & (XFW/EDHI) - Canon EOS D60 - ICQ: 235621277 - MSN: Tobias.Rose@gmx.de
 
flyingzacko
Posts: 572
Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 4:46 am

RE: Is Canon 75-300mm Is That Much Better?

Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:01 am

Ivan,

I would say, better always depends on what you want to do with it. Im currently using a Canon EOS 300D with a Tamron 28-300mm lens without IS and after a little while of getting used to it it works like a charm. I mean, of course IS is great for poorer light conditions, let's say for shutter speeds below 1/125s but above that I don't think it really matters if you have IS or not. And you said your lens is soft at full focal length, which I think can only be a matter of you not holding the camera 100% steady which I admit is hard at 300mm, but like I said, an IS won't change that unless in poor lighting.

Cheers,

Sebastian
Canon 40D + 24-70 f/2.8 L + 70-200 f/4 L + Speedlite 430EX
 
Psych
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: Is Canon 75-300mm Is That Much Better?

Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:14 am

Hi Ivan,

Take a look at this thread. There I posted a reply, where I also make a link to other threads that you may find informative on this subject.

Cheers.

Paul
 
Fly747
Topic Author
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:03 am

RE: Is Canon 75-300mm Is That Much Better?

Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:42 am

There seem to be mixed impressions among users. Thank you to all who replied. Paul, thanks for the links I found my answers there as well. I tried searching but... you know how that function works sometimes. I think I'll just stick with my non-IS lens and just upgrade to 100-400mm L later on. Thanks again.

Ivan
 
dstc47
Posts: 1253
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 1999 3:53 am

RE: Is Canon 75-300mm Is That Much Better?

Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:52 pm

My "IS" is certainly soft at the 300mm end.

IS is useful in low light and for near static subjects but it does not like moving aircraft and does not cope very well with them.

(Is it just me but do aircraft taxy too fast nowdays)
 
draigonair
Posts: 624
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 8:37 pm

RE: Is Canon 75-300mm Is That Much Better?

Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:49 pm

I used to have the 75-300mm USM III and I went to upgrade to the EF100-400mm and that one also has IS...would suggest this lens Big grin Get IS and 400mm!! Only if your budget allows it though!

goodluck

cheers

Nick
cheers
 
LOT767-300ER
Posts: 8526
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2001 12:57 pm

RE: Is Canon 75-300mm Is That Much Better?

Thu Jun 09, 2005 4:57 am

Im using this lense on a 350D and it does a solid job. Although the softness on moving aircraft in good light is not to be taken lightly.
 
Fly747
Topic Author
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:03 am

RE: Is Canon 75-300mm Is That Much Better?

Fri Jun 10, 2005 1:17 pm

It is possible to get a good shot in low light even without IS. I am happy I got this shot accepted in the DB. I shot it with my 300mm lens early morning. Sorry for the self plug, you don't have to click on it.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ivan Kresanek



Quoting DRAIGONAIR (Reply 7):
Get IS and 400mm!!

I will get it sooner or later, seems like one of the best lenses around.

Ivan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: derekf, FAST Enterprise [Crawler] and 3 guests