flighthelmets
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:40 pm

Extender EF 2X II Vs 100-400L

Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:34 pm

Thanks to all those people who have offered advice to me in relation to my new Canon 20D and operation. As previously mentioned I purchased the 20D and Canon EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM for Aviation (Air Show) photography. I'm off to NAS Oceana in Sept from home here in Australia. I want to maximize my opportunity to photograph the "Tomcat" before its withdrawal from service. I found that at the NAS Oceana 2004 show my Nikon 70-200 mm was just a little short on "legs" even given the 1.6 digital factor.

I have also purchased a Canon EF 2 X II Extender with the Canon kit mentioned above. My query is will I lose image quality if I go for the 70-200mm f/2.8 and 2 X Extender over say lashing out and purchasing a EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM. Which of the 2 scenarios will give me the best results given that I will be shooting some very fast military jets.

Thanks in advance to those who are going to offer advice  Smile


Alan Crane
Australia
 
User avatar
Fiveholer
Posts: 893
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 1999 6:27 am

RE: Extender EF 2X II Vs 100-400L

Tue Jul 19, 2005 11:30 pm

I do believe if you are going to get the 2x extender, I would stick to the 70-200 2.8. It's sharper, faster and you lose AF on the 100-400 with any TC on it I believe. It might lose AF only on certain bodies but if I remember, no matter the body, you lose AF on the 100-400 with any TC attached.

Danny
Bring back Bethune!
 
jderden777
Posts: 1677
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2000 9:56 am

RE: Extender EF 2X II Vs 100-400L

Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:33 am

Danny:
I don't think he's asking about using the extender with the 100-400, but rather which would be better?...70-200 & 2x OR 100-400. personally, i have the 70-200 with a 1.4x, and i'm likely going to pick up a 2x before oceana. of course, to maintain that L quality with the 2x on the 70-200, you will most likely need to stop it down to f9-11. when i have the 1.4x on i usually shoot in Av at f8. of course with the 20D, you can easily bump the iso up to 200 if you need to maintain a faster shutter speed (which, considering its oceana, you will need a fast shutter speed)

i would stick with the 70-200. that will be the set up i will be using at oceana in 2 months. plus, you will still have the 70-200 2.8 which would probably come in very handy at the night show

see you there!
jd

EDIT: edited to include this link here http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/400v400.shtml

[Edited 2005-07-19 18:37:07]
"my soul is in the sky" - shakespeare
 
User avatar
Fiveholer
Posts: 893
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 1999 6:27 am

RE: Extender EF 2X II Vs 100-400L

Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:44 am

Ah, duh! I had just woken up when I posted that. Head was still a little cloudy.  Smile

Danny
Bring back Bethune!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: derekf and 7 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos