|Quoting MarkJBeckwith (Reply 4):|
Thanks for your offer of correspondence - you don't know what you've let yourself in for.
It was meant Mark - go for it.
As to your question - I think they are all worthy of leaving in the queue, though in your position I would re-edit the originals at 1024 size and just check that this doesn't lead to a notable increase in quality. If so I would then swap them. As I said, though I do not think any of the 4 are actually soft to a major degree, my hunch is that the same USM
settings will make them appear just that bit sharper at the smaller size.
When I began uploading I started at 1600 pixels wide, because I misunderstood the upload advice and did not have much experience reading the Forum. No wonder getting acceptances was a bit challenging
. I then went down to 1200 wide, and now my standard upload is 1024 - partly because this is easier for so many to look at due to the size of most monitors.