bigphilnyc
Posts: 3874
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2002 10:43 pm

BadQuality Rejection

Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:02 am

I'm guessing I still have a lot to learn about Airliners.net standards. I don't understand the bad quality in this:

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/..._A346_B-6050_LAX25RDep2_100705.jpg

Can anybody help me out?

I want to make sure that the next time I get a side-on shot of an A346 with condensation and contrails in the sun that I meet the quality standards of this site.

Thanks,

-Phil Derner Jr.
Phil Derner Jr.
 
IL76
Posts: 2237
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 5:43 am

RE: BadQuality Rejection

Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:11 am

Looks to me like a heathaze/jaggy problem. The cheatline, where the fuselage meets the sky and the leading edge of the tail look like they're made of Lego.
That's my first impression...

Eduard
 
eadster
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:31 pm

RE: BadQuality Rejection

Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:20 am

Phil,

Nice shot. I really like it.

What I think the problem is here is that notice the stripes on the aircraft and the fuselage? They seem to have jaggies. Others may be able to shed some more light on this tho.

Once again, nice pic.

Martin
 
chris78cpr
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 7:44 am

RE: BadQuality Rejection

Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:37 am

Phil,

awesome shot but i agree about the heathaze issue Eduard mentioned.

Chris
5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
 
JeffM
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: BadQuality Rejection

Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:48 am

Phil,
The exposure is inconsistent from the front to the back, and from the top to the bottom. It has a dirty feel to it for some reason.
 
waketurbulence
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 12:33 pm

RE: BadQuality Rejection

Wed Oct 26, 2005 11:16 am

Not all of us get to shoot in the clean air of the Rockies  Wink . You said the same about my photos from LA, and I think the air is just dirty. There are many layers of smog. Anyway Phil I agree with the cheatlines, a lot of my Imperial shots came out the same way.
-Matt
 
davidu
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 2:24 am

RE: BadQuality Rejection

Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:05 am

Hi Phil

Just another thought.

Too much Jpeg compression resuluts in soft / rough edges resulting in bad Qual.

If this is the case, upload your 1024 shot with no Jpeg compression.

BRegds
David
 
bigphilnyc
Posts: 3874
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2002 10:43 pm

RE: BadQuality Rejection

Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:42 pm

It was at 1024 and was saved at maximum jpeg quality.
Phil Derner Jr.
 
DLKAPA
Posts: 7962
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 10:37 am

RE: BadQuality Rejection

Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:11 pm

Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 5):
Not all of us get to shoot in the clean air of the Rockies  wink 

Hehe, if you think Denver's air is clean, come up here  Silly
And all at once the crowd begins to sing: Sometimes the hardest thing and the right thing are the same
 
F9Widebody
Posts: 1475
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2003 5:47 am

RE: BadQuality Rejection

Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:58 pm

Quoting DLKAPA (Reply 8):
Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 5):Not all of us get to shoot in the clean air of the Rockies   
Hehe, if you think Denver's air is clean, come up here  

Hehe, Denver's air is pretty bad some days, but it doesn't hold a candle to the LA Area. The smog there is unbelievable, and you get a perfect view of it from Imperial Hill.

Regards
YES URLS in signature!!!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Borut, Yahoo [Bot] and 7 guests