bjcc
Posts: 342
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:29 am

87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:05 am

A touch worrying...I need to go out more often perhaps, but anyway. I have just had a quick count and on 14th Feb, just 87 photos were accepted.

I don't recall how many were waiting to be screen but this suggested one of 3 worrying things.

1. Screeners are not doing a lot.

Maybe, but I don't think this is the case.

2. The standards of photos submitted were not that good.

Again maybe.

3. The required standard is now becoming out of reach of many.

Maybe the quest for perfection has has been taken a bit too far too early?


Discuss



BernieC
 
waketurbulence
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 12:33 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:09 am

Maybe the screeners have a life. It is Valentines Day, they might be spending time with significant others/family etc. I just had 2 accepted an hour ago. Give it time, plenty of photos will come through.
-Matt
 
bjcc
Posts: 342
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:29 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:14 am

Wake

You missed the point.

87 accepted, is very very low. The queue moved down, in that plenty of pictures have been screened. But only 87 accepted.

It seems that over the last few days the situation been much the same.

Like I say, either the submitted pictures were unusually bad, or the standards are maybe too high too soon.

BernieC
 
JohnJ
Posts: 1362
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 5:01 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:38 am

Quoting Bjcc (Reply 2):
87 accepted, is very very low. The queue moved down, in that plenty of pictures have been screened. But only 87 accepted.



This doesn't just affect photographers, it affects viewers, too. When I browse Airliners.net I usually just hit the "Top of the Last 24 Hours" link and keep going for a half-hour or so. I usually run out of time long before I run out of material to peruse. Today was different - at present there are only 10 pages of photos (150 shots) to look at and it was a lot less than that when I took an "A.net" break earlier this afternoon.
 
D L X
Posts: 11655
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:50 am

I thought we were roasting the screeners last week...
 
United737522
Posts: 410
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 1:33 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 1:24 pm

Edited due to post being replied to being deleted.

[Edited 2006-02-15 05:24:48]
'Michael Mooronism' ~Jetjack74
 
TUNisia
Posts: 1515
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:24 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 1:26 pm

Gee, I hope my other 3 photos don't get rejected! This is my first real go at it.

This was rejected for common + jaggy (I really don't see the jaggy):

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ections/big/20060214_DSC_0083F.jpg

[Edited 2006-02-15 05:27:23]
Someday the sun will shine down on me in some faraway place - Mahalia Jackson
 
United737522
Posts: 410
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 1:33 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 1:44 pm

Jaggy? Are you kidding me? I see no jaggies...
'Michael Mooronism' ~Jetjack74
 
A346Dude
Posts: 1161
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 11:23 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 1:49 pm

I see a few jaggies around the Lufthansa titles and along the front edge of the horizontal stabilizer. Overall it appears a bit soft to my eyes, however, so I'm not sure if it can be brought up to standards.

This is a common problem I have with my photos, and I suspect it may be a product of a low megapixel count.
You know the gear is up and locked when it takes full throttle to taxi to the terminal.
 
eadster
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:31 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 1:56 pm

Quoting United737522 (Reply 7):
Jaggy? Are you kidding me? I see no jaggies...

Jagged logos (front and tail), jagged wings (leadig edge), jagged tail plane (Horizontal stabiliser), but all very easily fixed. Top shot regardless.

Quoting Bjcc (Thread starter):
The required standard is now becoming out of reach of many.

Its getting that way for me now, but I'll go down with a fight.
 
Stealthz
Posts: 5546
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:43 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 1:56 pm

Quoting D L X (Reply 4):
I thought we were roasting the screeners last week...

I actually thought we were having mature and meaningful conversations with them!

87 photos in 24 hrs, not great but as others said even screeners have lives, maybe events conspired to cause those "other lives" to all happen at the same time!
If that rate continued for more than a few days I would be agreeing with you that something needed doing.
(As of this writing photo search page shows 328 photos added in last 24 hrs, better but still not really enough)


C
If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
 
D L X
Posts: 11655
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 2:10 pm

Quoting StealthZ (Reply 10):
I actually thought we were having mature and meaningful conversations with them!

I agree. that statement was with tongue planted in cheek, but with the undermeaning suggesting that we don't take this day as an opportunity to have another mature and meaningful conversation with them. Not yet.
 
JeffM
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 3:07 pm

Quoting Bjcc (Thread starter):
A touch worrying...

LOL.....about how many pictures get accepted?

Quoting WakeTurbulence (Reply 1):
Maybe the screeners have a life. It is Valentines Day, they might be spending time with significant others/family etc

BINGO!  Wink

Quoting Bjcc (Thread starter):
3. The required standard is now becoming out of reach of many.

Nah

Quoting United737522 (Reply 5):
Edited due to post being replied to being deleted.

yeah, seems someone got upset..... imagine that.  Smile
 
Psych
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 4:02 pm

I had spotted this too, but I am very keen not to get into a negative mind set about these things. It was my impression that the reason was not that only a small proportion of photos were being accepted - more that there was not much screening to completion going on.

Therefore I had wondered whether the reason might be that there are big discussions and debates going on within the team about some of the issues and suggestions that have been raised over the last week or so. (The idea that many were attending to their loved ones is also a nice one.)

Now that would be a positive reason for the queue to be moving slowly, don't you think?

Paul
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 5:54 pm

I got three more of the dreaded 'Quality' rejections yesterday (out of three shots screened).

I am really struggling to meet the new standards.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
User avatar
jid
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:37 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:07 pm

Quoting Viv (Reply 14):
I am really struggling to meet the new standards

What new standards ?
Have I missed something.
G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
 
andrewuber
Posts: 2142
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:45 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:34 pm

Quoting Jid (Reply 15):
What new standards ?
Have I missed something.

OK you must not have uploaded anything in the past 3 months... so I'll fill you in.

Shots must be absolutely, positively, without-a-doubt, beyond perfect in every way, shape, form and fashion. I'm talking razor sharp (with zero jaggies), absolutely perfectly exposed (irrespective of conditions or time of day), centered to a tolerance of +/- .00249 pixels (vertically and horizontally), the motive must be approved by THREE screeners now (it used to be TWO), and you'd better consult Jane's to make sure your info is all correct (God forbid you forget to tick a box like "Special Paint" or some other obvious error like that). Anything less is totally and completely unacceptable.

My acceptance rate went from 80% to 30% in one month - and I didn't change a thing about how I process my photos. That should tell you something. And it's not just me - it's happening to everyone. I wouldn't be surprised if even the great Sam Chui himself has sat back in his chair, scratching his head wondering why a shot of an A380 in JetBlue colors rotating out of Martha's Vineyard got rejected for "bad angle". Sheeesh.  scratchchin 

In short - standards are way up, morale is way down. Some of us have all but stopped uploading.  down 

Drew
I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
 
PUnmuth@VIE
Posts: 3119
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 9:31 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:44 pm

Quoting AndrewUber (Reply 16):
(it used to be TWO),

It has always been 3 screeners.
-
 
flyfisher1976
Posts: 777
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:08 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:48 pm

Quoting AndrewUber (Reply 16):
I wouldn't be surprised if even the great Sam Chui himself has sat back in his chair, scratching his head wondering why a shot of an A380 in JetBlue colors rotating out of Martha's Vineyard got rejected for "bad angle". Sheeesh.

 checkmark 
 laughing 
LOL (actually, not figuratively)
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:05 pm

Quoting Psych (Reply 13):
the reason might be that there are big discussions and debates going on within the team about some of the issues and suggestions that have been raised over the last week or so.

If this were true, it would give grounds for hope ...
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
Rotate
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 5:52 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:12 pm

Kind of strange ... , I really do care about the whole discussion re Acceptance ratio and so on, but I dont give a sh... about when or how fast my/all pictures are screened.  scratchchin   scratchchin   scratchchin 

I find it totally justified that from time to time screening is slower. The reasons for that have been mentioned allready a thousand times the recent years !!!!  banghead  banghead  banghead 

Robin
ABC
 
linco22
Posts: 1278
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:16 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:14 pm

Quoting Viv (Reply 19):
If this were true, it would give grounds for hope ...

Dont be giving up on us Viv.

Regards
Colin  Smile
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:43 pm

Quoting Linco22 (Reply 21):
Dont be giving up on us Viv.

Not yet, but I am pretty discouraged.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
User avatar
jid
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:37 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:43 pm

Quoting AndrewUber (Reply 16):
OK you must not have uploaded anything in the past 3 months... so I'll fill you in.

Well I have been uploading at my normal rate, my acceptance level is 92% which is on average where it stays. Sometimes it will dip into the 80's when I have been a bit lazy with my processing ... So I have not noticed any difference.

Screening rates will change as screeners live there lives.... So again no change.

Just my observations from sunny Mobberley-on-Sea.

Jid

[Edited 2006-02-15 12:00:02]
G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:50 pm

Quoting Jid (Reply 23):
my acceptance level is 92%

I am (genuinely) happy for you. Nothing has changed in my photography or processing methods, but my acceptance rate has gone from 70% to 42% this year so far.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
flyfisher1976
Posts: 777
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:08 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:52 pm

Quoting Jid (Reply 23):
Screening rates will change as screeners live there lives....

I understand that screeners are not paid, but regardless, they have a job to do. So are you implying that when things get busy in their personal life, they can let their work slide? If I did this, I would not have a job. I'm not saying this is the case, but just countering your suggestion.
 
linco22
Posts: 1278
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 6:16 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:54 pm

Quoting Viv (Reply 24):
Nothing has changed in my photography or processing methods, but my acceptance rate has gone from 70% to 42% this year so far.

Viv thats only a reflection on this sites demands not your photography. My acceptance ratio has never gone above 50% and dont really see it going above that. Out of what i pick from a days shooting 50% of it has a decent chance of being accepted. The other are usually my favourites which wouldnt be accepted on here, usually for motive reasons.

Regards
Colin  Smile
 
User avatar
jid
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:37 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:26 pm

Quoting Flyfisher1976 (Reply 25):
I understand that screeners are not paid, but regardless, they have a job to do. So are you implying that when things get busy in their personal life, they can let their work slide? If I did this, I would not have a job. I'm not saying this is the case, but just countering your suggestion.

It tends to work in cycles, there will be periods where there appears to be not a great deal of screening being done, for what ever reason. Then there will be periods when all screeners are screening at once and the queue will shoot down.

At the start of the thread it was stated that 87 have been accepted but nowhere does it say out of how many images screened. It could of been a 87 out of a 1000 in which case the screening levels could be normal. Just a thought.
G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
 
flyfisher1976
Posts: 777
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:08 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:40 pm

Quoting Jid (Reply 27):
nowhere does it say out of how many images screened. It could of been a 87 out of a 1000 in which case the screening levels could be normal.

Or 87 out of 10,000...this could be normal too.  




Incidentally, I had 5 photos that were "lost" shortly after they were accepted. I was told to re-submit them at which point they would receive "priority screening"...

It has been ten days!



(edited for additional comments)

[Edited 2006-02-15 12:46:05]
 
User avatar
jid
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:37 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:53 pm

Quoting Flyfisher1976 (Reply 28):
Incidentally, I had 5 photos that were "lost" shortly after they were accepted. I was told to re-submit them at which point they would receive "priority screening"...

I had only one .. It took me a few days to upload it again, sent the e-mail off to the screeners and it accepted and added tot he DB in a few hours.
G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
 
andrewuber
Posts: 2142
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:45 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:58 pm

Quoting Jid (Reply 29):
I had only one .. It took me a few days to upload it again, sent the e-mail off to the screeners and it accepted and added tot he DB in a few hours.



Quoting Jid (Reply 23):
my acceptance level is 92%

Sounds like you are quite a lucky guy. Here in Indiana the Powerball is currently at $300 million, you might wanna get a ticket!

Drew
I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
 
User avatar
jid
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:37 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:09 pm

Drew ... get me a ticket Big grin, I am over in LA on Friday for a week, is that near Indiana ?
G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
 
bjcc
Posts: 342
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:29 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:23 pm

I think some of you are still missing the point.

I have not suggested, apart from being a possibility, that the screeners are not screening.

What I am suggesting is that given the low number of photos accepted in the 24 hrs between 13th and 14th of Feb, is there an issue with either:

The quality of the uplaods

or

The standards having now reached a point where they are niegh on impossible to meet.

I am making no comment, nor complaint about screeners, just raising a question

[Edited 2006-02-15 13:28:12]
 
timdegroot
Posts: 3258
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 10:37 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:44 pm

Let's keep this constructive guys, and don't start falling into the old pattern again.

There has been a lot of screening the past 24 hours, but most of that was on the normal queue, so few pictures have been added. It can happen occasionally, and I agree that having few pictures in the 24 hour list is not good, but I'm sure we'll add many again today.

FLyfisher: send us another email saying which photos were lost and we will add them. Sometimes emails just get lost in the flood.

Cheers
Tim
Alderman Exit
 
jran225
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:24 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:51 pm

Quoting AndrewUber (Reply 16):
wouldn't be surprised if even the great Sam Chui himself has sat back in his chair, scratching his head wondering why a shot of an A380 in JetBlue colors rotating out of Martha's Vineyard got rejected for "bad angle". Sheeesh.

LMFAO!!!!  rotfl 
Thank you Drew, you just made my day!

Regards,
-Omar S.  Smile
Never tell your girlfriend about all the 'action' you're getting at the airport - only photogs understand that.
 
flyfisher1976
Posts: 777
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:08 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:35 pm

Quoting Jran225 (Reply 34):
Thank you Drew, you just made my day!

 checkmark 

Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 33):
FLyfisher: send us another email saying which photos were lost and we will add them. Sometimes emails just get lost in the flood.

Will do...Thanks!

Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 33):
Let's keep this constructive guys, and don't start falling into the old pattern again.

What pattern is that? Are you referring to the number of people who are aggravated by many aspects of this websites direction when it comes to screening consistency and quality standards? I would imagine that this issue will continue to come up until it is addressed and reasonable solutions to these issues are implemented.
 
INNflight
Posts: 3526
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:11 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:40 pm

Ever thought that having less photos accepted is better for every individual photographer? Your own work gets more exposure. For free.

F.
Jet Visuals
 
flyfisher1976
Posts: 777
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:08 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:42 pm

Quoting INNflight (Reply 37):
Ever thought that having less photos accepted is better for every individual photographer? Your own work gets more exposure. For free.

F.

I'm sorry but either this is a overly abstract theory, or I have misunderstood what you were trying to say.
 
timdegroot
Posts: 3258
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 10:37 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:52 pm

Quoting Flyfisher1976 (Reply 36):
What pattern is that?

The pattern of unconstructive forumposts. Let's just leave it at that.

Tim
Alderman Exit
 
flyfisher1976
Posts: 777
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:08 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:01 pm

Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 39):
The pattern of unconstructive forumposts. Let's just leave it at that.

I just think it's funny that when these issues are brought up they are deemed "unconstructive". As stated earlier, morale among many photographers is already low. Here's a good way to boost morale: How about dealing with some of these issues directly, istead of dancing around them. Learning that specific changes are being implemented would certainly boost the morale of many photographers who have concerns over the current system and standards.
 
timdegroot
Posts: 3258
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 10:37 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:05 pm

Implications that we don't screen enough are hardly constructive.

Quoting Flyfisher1976 (Reply 40):
Here's a good way to boost morale: How about dealing with some of these issues directly, istead of dancing around them

If you have been following the forum at all of late you know that is just what we have been doing. Changes do not happen overnight, have some patience.

Tim
Alderman Exit
 
INNflight
Posts: 3526
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:11 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:06 pm

Quoting Flyfisher1976 (Reply 38):
Quoting INNflight (Reply 37):
Ever thought that having less photos accepted is better for every individual photographer? Your own work gets more exposure. For free.

I'm sorry but either this is a overly abstract theory, or I have misunderstood what you were trying to say.

When saying 'less photos accepted' I wasn't talking of my own shots, but in general.

If we have 1000 photos a day added they quickly dissappear in the database with less viewing exposure. The fewer new photos - more exposure for everyone's shots which made it.
Jet Visuals
 
bjcc
Posts: 342
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:29 am

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:09 pm

Tim

The idea was not to be 'unconstructive', just to find out if there is an issue with either low quality submissions or unreasonable expectations of the material submitted.

That material, being as it is the bread and better of this site, is hardly and unconstructive topic for discussion.

I accept there will always be those who will use this sort of thing to attack, which I have pointed out was not the intention.

The answers to the question are reasonbly simple to come by for those of you screening. Either a low number were looked at. Thats fine. It answers the point and thats the end of it.

Or

What was submitted was not really very good. Again, fine.

Or

The screening process has become too harsh. That could be an issue with some, and while not a bad thing per se, it would be better combined with more appropriate and accurate rejection reasons. This site is used by many to improve their photography, within the constrains of what airliners.net wants, rather than pure photographic techneque. So, if the barrier has now been raised to a level where getting a photo accepted is very difficult, then educate us by showing the error of our ways. I am not suggesting that it should be easy to get a picture added, just that we be given a reason which would help improve matters.

I know that wont make everyone happy, but it will improve the standard far better and quicker than the current meaningless rejection reasons.
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:11 pm

Quoting Flyfisher1976 (Reply 40):
when these issues are brought up they are deemed "unconstructive

Not so. But some of the replies don't contribute much.

I believe that the points raised - particularly those concerning the "Quality" rejection criterion - are under active consideration. I have not seen the screeners "dancing around them".

Let's give the screeners some time to work on this. A little bit of patience goes a long way.

Incidentally, I speak as someone who has seen a significant fall in his acceptance ratio.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
flyfisher1976
Posts: 777
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:08 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:28 pm

Quoting Viv (Reply 44):
I believe that the points raised - particularly those concerning the "Quality" rejection criterion - are under active consideration.

Are they? I wasn't aware of this. I don't have time to sit down and read every single line of every thread...Was this specifically mentioned elsewhere? To the best of my knowledge, there have been no specific comments made by anyone in charge that imply a reworking/analyzation of any aspect of the current system.
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:34 pm

Quoting Flyfisher1976 (Reply 45):
Was this specifically mentioned elsewhere?

Posted by Tim de Groot on 1O February:

my thought about the suggestions so far and the chance of them ever being implemented.

1- Revision of rejection categories. Good idea. NOA-Quality seems to be a problem especially.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
ghostbase
Posts: 343
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 4:49 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:41 pm

I have just started uploading in some quantity again after a break of a few months and although the screening time is perhaps longer than we have been used to at this time of year I would not say that the standard is noticeably higher, though it might be more thorough perhaps (don't ask me to justify that!).

My submissions have been a mix of film scans from 1989 and DSLR images from two weekends ago, there have been a couple of rejections however two of these were accompanied by personal messages from the Screener and in all three cases I can see where I went wrong and the rejections were wholly justified. Admittedly I aim at the areas of the database where there are far fewer images but I don't think the high standards are that flexible.

As for 87 photos accepted on the 14th February - gentlemen, do you have no heart at all? In my books that is 87 too many, there are far more important things to do on that particular date  Wink

 ghost 
"I chase my dreams but I never seem to arrive"
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:43 pm

Quoting Ghostbase (Reply 47):
there are far more important things to do on that particular date

You are perhaps referring to the St. Valentine's Day Massacre?
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
JAT74L
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 5:37 pm

RE: 87 Photos Accepted In The Last 24 Hours

Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:57 pm

Hey no screener bashing here!

My re-uploads that were "looked at" by Psych have all been accepted! The ones I have individually hand crafted have, err... Come back D'oh! D'oh! D'oh!!!!

Perhaps a JAT74L incompetence master class is needed!!

Regards

John

P.S. I'll bring a gallon of Malt down for you Paul if you can bottle your editing talent for me!
I like trains just as much as planes but trains don't like the Atlantic!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests