PUnmuth@VIE
Topic Author
Posts: 3119
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 9:31 pm

Did The Double Rule Change?

Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:05 pm

Just out of interest, did the double rule change?
As far as i can see it it is:
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/reasons.php#double
==
.
.
For cabin views we allow 2 shots per registration, date and photographer, when they show considerable different motives. The same applies for cockpit views.
.
.
==

Are there any changes not yet announced?
Peter
-
 
Rotate
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 5:52 pm

RE: Did The Double Rule Change?

Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:13 pm

 Smile  Smile

Nice to see you on the other side Peter ..... - asking in the Forum.

Robin

Ps: Did you have the chance to test your new baby sofar?
ABC
 
jorge1812
Posts: 2911
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 9:11 pm

RE: Did The Double Rule Change?

Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:29 pm

Interesting you started this topic as I came across this
one whilst browsing the the TOP 24h pics.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sam Chui



which reminded me of this one


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sam Chui



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sam Chui



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sam Chui



Just for interest and not for complaining for me they look all very similar.

Georg.
 
ChrisH
Posts: 1120
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 4:25 am

RE: Did The Double Rule Change?

Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:36 pm

Had the same thought, felt a bit Deja Vu
what seems to be the officer, problem?
 
Stealthz
Posts: 5546
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:43 am

RE: Did The Double Rule Change?

Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:44 pm

An approach to BKK

An inflight Thailand

A Ramp BKK

An approach to KLL

Don't see a real issue here!!

Oh OK the pedants may point out 4 shots same A/C, same date but 4 very different motives.

OK .. perhaps not absolutely in the spirit of the guidelines but has been thrashed out before!
If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
 
PUnmuth@VIE
Topic Author
Posts: 3119
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 9:31 pm

RE: Did The Double Rule Change?

Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:44 pm

Can we leave pics of photos already in the database out of this thread please?
No good style.
This was intended as a simple question from me not as fingerpointing to anyone.
Thanks
-
 
ChrisH
Posts: 1120
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 4:25 am

RE: Did The Double Rule Change?

Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:47 pm

Quoting StealthZ (Reply 4):
same date but 4 very different motives.

Huh??
what seems to be the officer, problem?
 
timdegroot
Posts: 3258
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 10:37 pm

RE: Did The Double Rule Change?

Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:05 pm

No changes that I'm aware of Peter.


Tim
Alderman Exit
 
Rotate
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 5:52 pm

RE: Did The Double Rule Change?

Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:11 pm

Quoting StealthZ (Reply 4):
An approach to BKK

An inflight Thailand

A Ramp BKK

An approach to KLL

Don't see a real issue here!!

 checkmark   checkmark   checkmark 

The accepted shot from Sam today had difficults earlier to enter the DB, cause of BadPeople I think ...

Robin
ABC
 
INNflight
Posts: 3526
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:11 am

RE: Did The Double Rule Change?

Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:19 pm

Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Thread starter):
we allow 2 shots per registration, date and photographer, when they show considerable different motives. The same applies for cockpit views.

That's the thing Chris and Georg refer too I guess.
Still, nice approach shot.
Jet Visuals
 
administrator
Posts: 2702
Joined: Mon May 17, 1999 5:11 am

RE: Did The Double Rule Change?

Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:24 am

Why the hell should we ever reject an amazing shot? The rules are there to serve us not the other way around. A very fundamental rule for Airliners.net that stands above everything else (and seems very easy to forget for some) is that rare / old / artistic / otherwise fantastic photos have lower rejection standards.

If that shot from Sam Chui had been a normal cockpit view when the aircraft was on the ground and without the great angles, yes - one or more would probably have been rejected for being double.

Enough said.

/ Johan
Working on the site from morning 'till night that's livin' alright (1997-2007)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests