INNflight
Topic Author
Posts: 3526
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:11 am

My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:49 pm

Thought I could need an own thread, so I don't have to open a new one every time I get rejected.  Smile

Quality and Center for the below one, and was really wondering what's wrong with this one?

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...me=20060428_CRW_1235airmaurzrh.jpg

Can't see why NOAquality - no grain, no halos, I don't know?
Regarding NOA center - there is almost exactly on the mm the same distance between tail and top as well as nose gear and bottom...?!

Thanks,
F.
Jet Visuals
 
JeffM
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:54 pm

Quoting INNflight (Thread starter):
there is almost exactly on the mm the same distance between tail and top as well as nose gear and bottom...?!

Quit with the numbers....it's too low in the frame to feel "right", and you cut off the a$s end of the starboard engine. The sooner you learn to stop checking numbers, the better off you will be.

As to the quality part, the image has a foggy feel to it that could be corrected.
 
andrewuber
Posts: 2142
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 10:45 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:56 pm

Florian!

The Center call is probably because the photo isn't very "balanced" in that you've chopped the #3 engine, but shown the entire left wing. I know you were going for centering the fuselage - and it IS centered - but the chopped engine is probably what killed it. Perhaps re-crop and leave the entire #3 engine, and the same amount of space between the #3 engine and the left side of the frame as between the winglet and the right side of the frame.

As for the NOAquality - the photo might be just a HAIR on the soft side - but frankly I'd just re-crop and re-upload. I can't see the quality issue.

Great shot Flo!

Drew  wave 
I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
 
PUnmuth@VIE
Posts: 3119
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 9:31 pm

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:43 pm

Quoting AndrewUber (Reply 2):
the #3 engine

The cut off #4 engine kills the shot for a.net and its a bit low also.

Peter
-
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Fri Apr 28, 2006 3:36 pm

Regardless of the numbers, it is too low in the frame. It should "look" right. It does not.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
glennstewart
Posts: 952
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 9:11 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Fri Apr 28, 2006 3:49 pm

Hi Florian,

Long time, no see.... Everytime I see Austrian landing at SYD, I think of you and Peter and how I really need to get back to Austria!

Btw, the Austrian 777's are looking fantastic in Sydney. I miss Lauda, but the livery is beautiful and it's great to have all three of them with Australian names  Smile (Sydney, Melbourne and OE-LPC was always named after the Australian Cricketer, Don Bradman)...

Anyway, I digress....

I'll reiterate what others have said - little low in the frame and as such, would get a centre reject easily on the first screening.

I'd expect with your experience, that you'd know this already. But to be fair, I have noted much confusion with the centre rejection on this forum of late.

For me, it's a pretty easy rejection to spot, and I'm glad you're posting here because I think more examples on the forums will lead (slowly but surely) to an understanding of the way these are critiqued.


Kindest Regards and well wishes,

Glenn Stewart
Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
 
Rotate
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 5:52 pm

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:13 pm

Yep! too low in the frame and the whole cheat line + fensterchen are looking kind of unreal ... , dont worry! Nice for everyone that you also get a rejection from time to time.

 bouncy   bouncy 

Robin
ABC
 
INNflight
Topic Author
Posts: 3526
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:11 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:04 pm

Thanks for your comments guys... I normally always center to make it look right instead of going with numbers, I guess I just had a really bad start into my day this morning.  Smile

I'll just keep it for my collection.

Quoting Rotate (Reply 6):
Nice for everyone that you also get a rejection from time to time

Don't worry Robin, I'm having tons of.  Smile

Btw, Glenn - I'll pm you my messenger add... we have to talk again sometime.

Cheers,
F.
Jet Visuals
 
Granite
Posts: 5026
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 5:55 pm

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:52 pm

Florian

My eye was drawn straight to the engine cut off.

First time I have seen this image too.

Regards

Gary
 
D L X
Posts: 11629
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:07 am

Quoting Viv (Reply 4):
It should "look" right. It does not.

To whom? I personally think the centering rejection removes a LOT of photographer artistic license from the shots here. I've had similar problems: when I centered the fuselage in the frame, it was considered too high. When I centered the entirety of the plane, it was considered too low. . .

Quoting JeffM (Reply 1):
Quit with the numbers....it's too low in the frame to feel "right", and you cut off the a$s end of the starboard engine. The sooner you learn to stop checking numbers, the better off you will be.

. . . but the numbers are the only thing we have to go on. What "feels right" to you doesn't always "feel right" to me or "feel right" to the screeners. I wish we could get some guidance on that. For instance, this one took forever, and a crop I really didn't want to make to get accepted.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Damon Marcus Lewis

 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:26 am

Quoting D L X (Reply 9):
but the numbers are the only thing we have to go on

Not so. Centering is a matter of aesthetics. It cannot always be done by the numbers. there will always be an element of subjectivity.

When I centre a shot, I NEVER measure it by the numbers.

[Edited 2006-04-28 22:27:26]
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
User avatar
walter2222
Posts: 1236
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:40 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:34 am

Quoting Viv (Reply 10):
When I centre a shot, I NEVER measure it by the numbers.

 checkmark 

It 's like the old saying: "if it looks good, it will fly good!"  Smile
The same is true with pictures, it should "feel" good when you look at it, and then it is OK!

Best regards,

Walter
Canon 347d mkII ;-) - EFS10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - EFS18-55mm - EF28-105mm f3.5/4.5 - EF100-400mm f4.5-5.6l IS USM - ...
 
D L X
Posts: 11629
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:39 am

Quoting Viv (Reply 10):
Centering is a matter of aesthetics.

But aesthetics are the extreme of subjectivity. I agree with you in principle and so my main complaint about centering is about how it should be only a loose standard recognizing that reasonable people may reasonably differ on the issue of whether a shot is centered well.

For instance, the whole "lead the action" rule that I was taught (and I'm sure plenty other photographers were taught) is frowned upon here - you'll get a centering rejection every time.
 
glennstewart
Posts: 952
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 9:11 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sat Apr 29, 2006 11:18 am

Quoting D L X (Reply 12):
For instance, the whole "lead the action" rule that I was taught (and I'm sure plenty other photographers were taught) is frowned upon here - you'll get a centering rejection every time.

I think you "lead the action" to ensure you get the shot in the first place(certainly true with military jets). But in the end by leading the action, you aim to get the shot centred.

Glenn
Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
 
Psych
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:15 pm

I think these centering debates are very useful given the difficulties we have providing clarity on this criterion.

For me, Flo, the bigger issue on your shot is the horizontal centering, rather than the vertical. The fact that the main body of the fuselage is biased to the left of the shot is drawn to the viewers' attentions by that engine cowling being cropped out. Had there been more space to the left I think it would have been a much less clear rejection. But having said this - and I do agree about that engine, as mentioned above - many of us have biased the centering of the 'main' part of the aircraft to include the ends of wings etc in the past.

I am grateful to Damon for posting his example shot, and hope that the fact that he has done so will allow me to use it as a subject to comment on:

I see lots of shots like this with the tail of the aircraft almost touching the top of the crop, and there being varying amounts of space below the bottom of the aircraft. According to my subjective mind, this leads to an unbalanced shot - i.e. that subject as a whole is too high in the frame. Can anyone explain to me the rationale for this being correctly centred?

Cheers.

Paul
 
chris78cpr
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 7:44 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sun Apr 30, 2006 9:52 am


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jeffrey Mossing



I disagree with Flo's rejection if this is aloud on. I think this JAL shot is great and is well waranted in the DB, dont get me wrong. But i also think Flo's shot is great too and is warranted on the DB as much as that one is. I dont want to offend anyone by posting this, i just wanted to show that off center is good sometimes!

Chris
5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
 
JeffM
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sun Apr 30, 2006 9:55 am

Quoting Chris78cpr (Reply 15):
I think this JAL shot is great and is well waranted

That photo has balance overall... Flo's doesn't, it's awkward as he posted it.
 
chris78cpr
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 7:44 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:00 am

Quoting JeffM (Reply 16):
That photo has balance overall... Flo's doesn't, it's awkward as he posted it.

It depends if you know the area. Considering that the fence would have been present in the shot if it had been cropped centered i dont think it is inbalanced. I like the JAL shot and i like Flo's shot.

Chris
5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
 
edoca
Posts: 666
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:30 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:06 am

Quoting Psych (Reply 14):
I am grateful to Damon for posting his example shot, and hope that the fact that he has done so will allow me to use it as a subject to comment on:

I see lots of shots like this with the tail of the aircraft almost touching the top of the crop, and there being varying amounts of space below the bottom of the aircraft. According to my subjective mind, this leads to an unbalanced shot - i.e. that subject as a whole is too high in the frame. Can anyone explain to me the rationale for this being correctly centred?

Very interesting remarks from Damon and Paul indeed. The only rationale I could see is that there is roughly an equal part of blue sky and grey tarmac in this picture, with the plane and background taking up the rest of the area in between. But with all respect to Damon, but it does look a bit awkward indeed.

My last three accepted pics happen to be cases where I cropped to have a roughly equal portion above the tail and below the wheels. I would have thought this was the way airliners.net wants the pictures to be, and they were accepted. Perhaps it's difficult to compare situations though...

Edit: I was trying to find a pic that resembles Flo's situation a bit, perhaps this one comes close:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ward Callens


No perfect equal distances above and below, yet probably OK balance. But it is far from the example shown above I think.

[Edited 2006-04-30 03:08:00]

[Edited 2006-04-30 03:12:19]
 
Stealthz
Posts: 5546
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:43 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:12 am

Quoting Chris78cpr (Reply 17):
It depends if you know the area. Considering that the fence would have been present in the shot if it had been cropped centered i dont think it is inbalanced

Nothing to do with it...to my mind Florian's photo is out of balance, too low in frame, cropping it that way because there is a fence in the frame does not make it a balanced picture. Let me put it this way, a well composed and well balanced photo should stand on it's own merits not require the viewer to make allowances or to know why it was composed the way it is

I have hundreds of photos that look great in prints or online but are cropped to a different aspect ratio than is acceptable here, because of fences etc.
I think if a 16:9 aspect ratio was allowed at A.net Florian would have a great shot but as it stands now.. not quite.
If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
 
jumbojim747
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 8:05 pm

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:07 pm

Flo this is a great shot and if possible to re edit it and resubmit would look great .
All the best with it
Cheers
On a wing and a prayer
 
JeffM
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:51 pm

Quoting StealthZ (Reply 19):
Nothing to do with it...to my mind Florian's photo is out of balance, too low in frame, cropping it that way because there is a fence in the frame does not make it a balanced picture. Let me put it this way, a well composed and well balanced photo should stand on it's own merits not require the viewer to make allowances or to know why it was composed the way it is

Exactly!  bigthumbsup 
 
glennstewart
Posts: 952
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 9:11 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Tue May 02, 2006 11:18 pm

Quoting Chris78cpr (Reply 15):
I think this JAL shot is great and is well waranted in the DB

Chris, this falls into the category of "motivational centering". It's completely allowed but up to the discretion of the screeners to decide if it is motivational or not. We liked this one obviously.

Glenn
Respected users.... If my replies are useful, then by all means...
 
chris78cpr
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 7:44 am

RE: My Personal Rejection Thread - Advice Please

Wed May 03, 2006 3:28 am

Quoting Glennstewart (Reply 22):
Chris, this falls into the category of "motivational centering". It's completely allowed but up to the discretion of the screeners to decide if it is motivational or not. We liked this one obviously.

I like it too! I think the composition with the tower is great, please dont think i was using that example as a bad one.

Chris
5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DocBrown and 10 guests