User avatar
Dahlgardo
Topic Author
Posts: 193
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 5:46 am

Rusty Editing Skills

Mon May 08, 2006 9:41 pm

Hi all

I'm beginning to find time for some uploading again, but with the ever increasing standards on a.net I would love some feedback on the shots I currently have queued. This is just to make sure I'm not wasting my time.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/hl7601-02102004-lax.jpg
Does the sticker on the side justify "hybrid" selection ?


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/cgaus1-06102004-mhv.jpg
Is quality OK ?


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/vhean1-09102004-vcv.jpg
Quality, motive ?

Thanks for any help.

/Jakob
leave your nines at home and bring your skills to the battle
 
Knighty
Posts: 203
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 2:36 pm

RE: Rusty Editing Skills

Mon May 08, 2006 10:16 pm

Not sure about what category the first one falls into, the last 2 look a little heat hazed to me. Just out of interest, in the 3rd shot is the aircraft closest to camera VH-EAN?

Knighty
Ian Knight - Proud Canon shooter!
 
Sinkrate
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:52 pm

RE: Rusty Editing Skills

Mon May 08, 2006 10:31 pm

Quoting Knighty (Reply 1):
is the aircraft closest to camera VH-EAN?

Knighty, it looks like it to me. Thats also what the file name says. smile 

Michael
 
User avatar
Kukkudrill
Posts: 1043
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 10:11 pm

RE: Rusty Editing Skills

Tue May 09, 2006 12:49 am

No. 1: Not sure about the category either, but I can't help feeling that the rear fuselage does not look as sharp as the front. I would try a little selective sharpening.

No. 2: Either heat distortion as Knighty says, or else (just possibly) artifacts introduced as a result of resizing in one step -- something that has happened to me in the past. I'm referring in particular to the apparent unevenness of the vertical stabiliser leading and trailing edges.

No. 3: I don't see any heat distortion on this one. I think the tape on the aircraft was simply applied unevenly. I would recrop to get the aircraft more vertically centred, but other than this I like the motive.

Charles
Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
 
User avatar
Dahlgardo
Topic Author
Posts: 193
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 5:46 am

RE: Rusty Editing Skills

Tue May 09, 2006 1:14 am

Quoting Knighty (Reply 1):
Not sure about what category the first one falls into, the last 2 look a little heat hazed to me. Just out of interest, in the 3rd shot is the aircraft closest to camera VH-EAN?

It certainly is. VH-EAO is behind it.

Quoting Kukkudrill (Reply 3):
No. 1: Not sure about the category either, but I can't help feeling that the rear fuselage does not look as sharp as the front. I would try a little selective sharpening.

The blurryness is possibly caused by the jet blast. I'll see if I can improve it.

Quoting Kukkudrill (Reply 3):
No. 2: Either heat distortion as Knighty says, or else (just possibly) artifacts introduced as a result of resizing in one step -- something that has happened to me in the past. I'm referring in particular to the apparent unevenness of the vertical stabiliser leading and trailing edges

I thought re-sizing in one step was the best thing to do, to minimize loss of data ?

Quoting Kukkudrill (Reply 3):
No. 3: I don't see any heat distortion on this one. I think the tape on the aircraft was simply applied unevenly. I would recrop to get the aircraft more vertically centred, but other than this I like the motive.

Thanks for your help

/Jakob
leave your nines at home and bring your skills to the battle
 
User avatar
Kukkudrill
Posts: 1043
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 10:11 pm

RE: Rusty Editing Skills

Tue May 09, 2006 1:22 am

Quoting Dahlgardo (Reply 4):
I thought re-sizing in one step was the best thing to do, to minimize loss of data ?

Exactly what I used to think, until I went from 3.2 to 8 megapixels and I started getting stepped diagonals. These days I resize in stages of around 400 pixels at a time.

Charles
Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
 
Stealthz
Posts: 5550
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:43 am

RE: Rusty Editing Skills

Tue May 09, 2006 9:55 am

Quoting Kukkudrill (Reply 5):
Exactly what I used to think, until I went from 3.2 to 8 megapixels and I started getting stepped diagonals. These days I resize in stages of around 400 pixels at a time.

What do you use to edit/resize you photos?
Using PSCS and before that PS7 I crop to a 3:2 or 4:3 aspect ratio image at orig resolution. If I have framed properly at shooting stage that will give me an image 2,200 to 3000px wide, then I do all the editing steps(leveled prior to crop if needed). I then resize to 1024 or 1200 wide in one step and save as Max jpg. I don't have the jaggie issue you speak of.

Cheers

Chris
If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
 
User avatar
Kukkudrill
Posts: 1043
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 10:11 pm

RE: Rusty Editing Skills

Wed May 10, 2006 1:33 am

Quoting StealthZ (Reply 6):
What do you use to edit/resize you photos?

Chris,

I use Photoshop Elements 2.0. I follow pretty much the same workflow as you do, except that I sharpen after resizing as the very last step.

After I got my 350D I had a couple of photos rejected due to jaggies in areas where I had deliberately refrained from sharpening altogether. The effect was more one of steps rather than the normal sawtooth jaggies, a bit like the cheatline in this older photo (taken with a 4mp camera)

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Charles Polidano


but much more pronounced. Then I read that some people resized in stages, and now that I've started to do the same I haven't had the problem again. Maybe my version of Elements can't handle a lot of resizing at one go?

Charles
Make the most of the available light ... a lesson of photography that applies to life
 
eadster
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:31 pm

RE: Rusty Editing Skills

Wed May 10, 2006 7:51 am

The shots of the 767's should be ok.

Korean is soft and I don't think the quality is there with that shot. If it could be improved and accepted - I would put into special category, but if that marking is on other aircaft, I'd place into Hybrid.

That's my take on things.
 
User avatar
Dahlgardo
Topic Author
Posts: 193
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 5:46 am

RE: Rusty Editing Skills

Fri May 12, 2006 4:20 am

Quoting Eadster (Reply 8):
Korean is soft and I don't think the quality is there with that shot. If it could be improved and accepted - I would put into special category, but if that marking is on other aircaft, I'd place into Hybrid.

Thanks for your input. I'll pull the KE 747 from the queue and see if I can re-work it.

/Jakob
leave your nines at home and bring your skills to the battle

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: shattuckb02 and 4 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos