Posts: 220
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 10:41 am

Scanning Prints Vs Kodak CD

Fri May 12, 2006 9:39 am

I was wondering whether anyone knew which wa of getting film shots onto a computer produces better quality. Scanning prints or using Kodak's service where they take your films shots and put them on a cd. I was wondering whether anyone here uses that. I would be developing at Costco.
Time you enjoy wasting, is not wasted.
Posts: 5026
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 5:55 pm

RE: Scanning Prints Vs Kodak CD

Fri May 12, 2006 4:18 pm

Hi Ashwin

I have a few Kodak CD's but have to say that scanning the negatives myself produces far better results.

If I were you I would go for an Epson flatbed scanner with the transparency adaptors and scan the negatives (not the prints) yourself.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Watt - AirTeamImages

Cannot remember the Epson one I have at the moment but it cost about 80.00 UK Pounds.

Mail me later in the evening if you want more info.



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests