flamedude707
Posts: 220
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 10:41 am

Scanning Prints Vs Kodak CD

Fri May 12, 2006 9:39 am

I was wondering whether anyone knew which wa of getting film shots onto a computer produces better quality. Scanning prints or using Kodak's service where they take your films shots and put them on a cd. I was wondering whether anyone here uses that. I would be developing at Costco.
Time you enjoy wasting, is not wasted.
 
Granite
Posts: 5026
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 5:55 pm

RE: Scanning Prints Vs Kodak CD

Fri May 12, 2006 4:18 pm

Hi Ashwin

I have a few Kodak CD's but have to say that scanning the negatives myself produces far better results.

If I were you I would go for an Epson flatbed scanner with the transparency adaptors and scan the negatives (not the prints) yourself.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Watt - AirTeamImages


Cannot remember the Epson one I have at the moment but it cost about 80.00 UK Pounds.

Mail me later in the evening if you want more info.

Regards

Gary

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests