IAH777
Topic Author
Posts: 2810
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:55 pm

Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Wed May 31, 2006 2:46 pm

I am contemplating the purchase of the 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED VR AF Zoom-Nikkor, but I'm concerned about the oft-mentioned slowness of the AF. From the numerous reviews I've read, I keep reading than this lens is horrible for action shots (mostly sports or birds in-flight). OTOH, I see some very good images here in the db crediting this lens. Since 95% of my photography is aviation, I figured I'd come to the ultimate source.

Some items to keep in mind:

Since I'm currently shooting with a stop-gap Sigma 70-300mm (US$120 job), will I really notice the lag that much?

No, I'm not switching to Canon.

I'm on a public servant's salary, so primes and the 200-400mm VR are right out of my budget.

Is the risk of import/gray market vs. USA all that big a deal?

Is the Sigma 80-400mm APO OS a viable competitor?




Thanks in advance for any assistance.

Matt
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Wed May 31, 2006 3:13 pm

The autofocus is a little slow, but action shots are possible - I have never missed a shot because of the lens failing to lock on.

Here are a few examples:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vivion Mulcahy



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vivion Mulcahy



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vivion Mulcahy



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vivion Mulcahy



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vivion Mulcahy



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vivion Mulcahy



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vivion Mulcahy



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vivion Mulcahy

Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
User avatar
scbriml
Posts: 13239
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 10:37 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Wed May 31, 2006 4:39 pm

Quoting Viv (Reply 1):
The autofocus is a little slow, but action shots are possible - I have never missed a shot because of the lens failing to lock on.

The AF is slow when compared to other Nikon AF-S lenses. I've had this lens for two years now and I have missed a few shots because of the slower AF. It isn't sharpest at 400mm, but acceptable for a.net:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Brimley



In my experience, where this lens does struggle is in less than perfect conditions, i.e. shooting planes in poor weather. In good conditions, I think the lens is perfectly adequate. Would I prefer the 200-400mm VR? Of course, but I'd have to win the lottery first!
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana!
 
skidmarks
Posts: 6614
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 7:51 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Wed May 31, 2006 4:58 pm

Quoting Scbriml (Reply 2):
In my experience, where this lens does struggle is in less than perfect conditions, i.e. shooting planes in poor weather. In good conditions, I think the lens is perfectly adequate.

Have to agree there Steve. You have to be very lucky to achieve a good shot in dull or low-light situations. But, on the whole, I like the lens. It is perfectly adequate for most uses. And I agree with your lottery statement!! Big grin

Personally, I wouldn't touch Sigma with yours, let alone mine, Matt. But lots of people use their lenses and think they are great. Comes down to personal choice I guess. Good luck deciding.

Andy  old 
Growing old is compulsory, growing up is optional
 
IngemarE
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:46 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Wed May 31, 2006 4:59 pm

If I were you, I'd go for a Sigma 50-500 a.k.a Bigma instead.
Much faster focusing and better optical quality compared to Nikon's 80-400.

I owned a Nikon 80-400 once, + I've tried the Bigma, and I must say that Nikons 80-400 doesn't stand a chance compared to the Bigma. I find the 80-400 really soft past 300mm (stopped down or not), as well as a bit slow. Slow focus is due to the fact that it doesn't have a built-in AF-motor, so should you decide to use it on a D1/D2 body, you probably won't notice very much AF-lag. The softness however, will still be there.
In thrust I trust.
 
NIKV69
Posts: 10889
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:27 am

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Wed May 31, 2006 8:17 pm

Quoting Scbriml (Reply 2):
The AF is slow when compared to other Nikon AF-S lenses. I've had this lens for two years now and I have missed a few shots because of the slower AF. It isn't sharpest at 400mm, but acceptable for a.net:

I own this lens and this statement is spot on.

Where is Royal? He would have a lot to add on this subject.  biggrin 
Hey that guy with the private jet can bail us out! Why? HE CAN AFFORD IT!
 
Wanderer
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 4:47 am

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Tue Jun 06, 2006 6:51 am

I have a Sigma 170-500mm DG APO zoom which, so far, I'm very pleased with. It retails for around £600 (prices vary from retailer to retailer), the autofocus is quicker than the Nikon VR 80-400 (I have used one of those in the past) and the images are sharp.
 
D L X
Posts: 11630
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:16 am

Wait, so this is VR without AF-S? I guess I had always assumed it had its own focusing motor like most other VRs.

Does the Bigma have an internal motor?
 
pavvyben
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:53 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:56 am

Yes the Bigma does have one aka HSM (Hyper Sonic Motor)

Its a very good lens, i struggle with it in poor weather and often find myself cranking up the ISO on my D50. Ive got some very nice shots out of it though and its great for shooting through a fence i find Big grin. Its quite heavy which takes a while to get used to but still a great lens. The quality drops off slightly as you push it through 450mm i find.

Hope this helps

Ben
 
User avatar
Kereru
Posts: 596
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 8:19 am

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Wed Jun 07, 2006 7:12 pm

I bought the 80-400 VR in preference as it is lighter smaller than the Bigma. It is also an f4.5-5.6 as opposed to the Bigma's f5.6-6.3 aperture. The review that convinced me was this one of Ken Rockwell's. http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/80400vr.htm Fast action is not for this lens but with a bit of practice and becoming good at anticipating what is happening next you will still get some good shots.

Good lighting is always important no matter what lens you use but when I was at Warbirds over Wanaka recently the light was not good on the 15th April and at Wanaka most photos are shot in to the sun as that is how the airport is laid out unfortunately. My friend was there and left his Bigma in the bag and used his 70-200 lens with converter.
Some of my samples are:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter



Airliners:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter



There are plenty of other samples in the DB.
The Bigma is much cheaper and a good alternative if you can't afford the 80-400. The results i had from using the Bigma were rather soft and i am not keen on the push pull zoom mechanism either.

Cheers,
Colin
Good things take Time.
 
sulman
Posts: 1963
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 5:09 am

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Wed Jun 07, 2006 7:29 pm

I've seen lots of good images from photographers using this lens, although some seen to dislike it.
It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
 
IAH777
Topic Author
Posts: 2810
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:55 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Thu Jun 08, 2006 6:07 am

Quoting Kereru (Reply 9):
...and i am not keen on the push pull zoom mechanism either.

Push/pull?!? This is the first I've heard of the Bigma having a push/pull zoom...
 
IAH777
Topic Author
Posts: 2810
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:55 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Fri Jun 09, 2006 3:44 pm

Quoting IAH777 (Reply 11):
Push/pull?!? This is the first I've heard of the Bigma having a push/pull zoom...

Did a little additional research and found the Bigma is not push/pull.
 
sunilgupta
Posts: 766
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 12:15 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Sat Jun 10, 2006 2:35 am

AF is slow, yes, but has only caused me problems if the lens has to hunt to find focus. This only happens if I have turned off the focus limit switch to shoot the kids or something.

Shoot at f7.1 and you can't go wrong with this lens (even at 400mm). In low light, I've found it's better to bump the ISO on the D200 rather than open the aperture on this lens.

Sunil
 
IngemarE
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:46 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Sat Jun 10, 2006 5:04 am

Quoting Sunilgupta (Reply 13):
Shoot at f7.1 and you can't go wrong with this lens (even at 400mm).

Which gives you about 0 control over DoF. Which is, to me anyway, unacceptable.  thumbsdown  At least if you want to do anything else besides aviation-photography.

The 80-400 VR is, compared to the usual Nikon-standard, a PoS-lens and doesn't really do the brand name any justice.
That is my opinion, and by golly!, I'll stand by it!!  Wink
In thrust I trust.
 
User avatar
Kereru
Posts: 596
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 8:19 am

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Sat Jun 10, 2006 10:53 am

Quoting IAH777 (Reply 12):
Did a little additional research and found the Bigma is not push/pull.

Your right I got a bit mixed up there with the Canon 100-400, sorry!
Couple of shots taken with the 50-500 Sigma:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Colin Hunter



The Sigma's size and weight and i wanted to standidise on filter size of 77mm helped me make the decision for the 80-400 Nikon lens.
Good things take Time.
 
IngemarE
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:46 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Sat Jun 10, 2006 5:26 pm

Quoting Kereru (Reply 15):
The Sigma's size and weight and i wanted to standidise on filter size of 77mm helped me make the decision for the 80-400 Nikon lens.

I'll buy those arguments in favour of the Nikkor.  Wink
As for myself, I decided that I needed some extra exercise, as well as sharp shots, so I opted for the Sigma 120-300 coupled to a D1X (with its dreaded EN-4s)  weightlifter .
In thrust I trust.
 
sunilgupta
Posts: 766
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 12:15 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:28 am

Quoting IngemarE (Reply 14):
Which gives you about 0 control over DoF. Which is, to me anyway, unacceptable. At least if you want to do anything else besides aviation-photography.

Well, my remarks are with respect to aviation photography. The lens is amazing wide open or at any aperture for the kids sports shots, birds, and just about anything else when you put into the context of a one-stop-shop lens.

Quoting IngemarE (Reply 14):
The 80-400 VR is, compared to the usual Nikon-standard, a PoS-lens and doesn't really do the brand name any justice.

What is the usual Nikon standard? Have you ever seen the low-end stuff? Are you comparing this lens to their consumer grade lenses? I'm guessing not. If you can afford, and more importantly, can carry around the big glass, then by comparison this lens would look like a PoS. But if you want a decent all-around lens that it's far from a PoS.

Quoting IngemarE (Reply 14):
That is my opinion, and by golly!, I'll stand by it!!

We have a saying about opinions here in the States...

Sunil
 
IngemarE
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:46 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Sun Jun 11, 2006 5:33 am

With all due respect, but I've had two different 80-400VR's pass through my hands.
The first one was OK-ish as long as I kept it below 300mm's. The second one s*cked all around. Wide open, or stopped down. Didn't matter.
Not one of my photog-bud's who had an example of this lens in their hands have anything really good to say about it. So I'll just leave it at that.

Yes, I do agree that some Nikon consumer-lenses (especially in the past) have been "not so good". But the ones released more recently (apart from the really cheap ones) have actually been pretty good glass.
The thing that really bugs me about the 80-400VR is mainly the "hype" around this it. Plus, it's rather expensive compaired to what it produces picture-wise.

Quoting Sunilgupta (Reply 17):
We have a saying about opinions here in the States...

Care to elaborate on that one?

[Edited 2006-06-10 22:36:33]
In thrust I trust.
 
D L X
Posts: 11630
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:26 am

Quoting IngemarE (Reply 18):
Quoting Sunilgupta (Reply 17):
We have a saying about opinions here in the States...

Care to elaborate on that one?

Never jump a horse midstream?

or maybe Never change pitchers in the bottom of the inning...

(GWB)
 
sunilgupta
Posts: 766
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 12:15 pm

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:20 pm

Quoting IngemarE (Reply 18):
The thing that really bugs me about the 80-400VR is mainly the "hype" around this it. Plus, it's rather expensive compared to what it produces picture-wise.

I don't think it's "hype". I think it's a practical matter. What other single lens can give you this tele-range? For travelers this is important. I simply can't carry around a bunch of prime lenses and I don't want to use a tele-convertor on the 80-200.

However, I do fully agree that Nikon could have done a better job (build quality, AFS, fixed f)... but at what price would that "perfect" lens have come in?

Sunil
 
brianw999
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:15 am

RE: Just How Slow Is The 80-400mm VR Nikkor?

Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:00 am

Quoting D L X (Reply 7):
I have a Sigma 170-500mm DG APO zoom which, so far, I'm very pleased with. It retails for around £600 (prices vary from retailer to retailer), the autofocus is quicker than the Nikon VR 80-400 (I have used one of those in the past) and the images are sharp.

I received today my latest present to myself...a Sigma 170-500 f5 - 6.3.
It cost me £295 second hand on ebay (normally around £630.00 new), is in mint condition and I'm loving it so far. Only shot a few outdoor general pics to test it out but it handles remarkably well for such a big lens (filter is 86mm). I like the facility of either push/pull or rotating collar zoom and particularly like the fact that I can support it with a hand on the main barrel of the lens without interfering with the autofocus collar. Aperture isn't a problem with me as I generally try to shoot at around f8 to f11 to maintain depth of field.

Like I say, I've only owned it for about 6 hours but first impressions are good.

A note of caution re: ebay. There are a goodly few scamsters ( personally, I refer to them as "scumsters" !! ) around these days selling goods at ridiculously low prices. If it looks too good to be true...it probably is !!
Check the sellers ratings and feedback. If they live nearby then you may be able to go and see the goods. I saved over £300 on my purchase. If I had thought it necessary to check the situation it would have been worthwhile to combine a visit to my kids 140 miles away with a visit to the seller another 20 miles down the road.
On the subject of the seller of my lens, he goes under the ebay username of "van_reys". I recommend him to you. He's an excellent ebayer and looks after his customers. Not much help if you live in the USA though as he only sells within the UK.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexa [Bot] and 40 guests