Psych
Topic Author
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:20 am

Hi All.

I would be grateful for any help, as I have just had that 'A.net' feeling, after coming home from a great day out.

I see that I have had the following two photos rejected for 'info'.

Photo One

Photo Two

They were uploaded using the Auto Complete function, and have exactly the same information as a previous set of 7 photos of Hawks from this trip, that all successfully passed through screening some weeks ago.

So as far as I can see I have done nothing differently, or nothing wrong. Am I missing something? They are uploaded as 'British Aerospace Hawk...' and 'UK - Air Force' and have the correct registration and c/n. They are also correctly categorised as 'Military'.

Cheers.

Paul
 
User avatar
ptrjong
Posts: 4121
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:38 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:54 am

Hi Paul,

Uploaded as 'Hawk...'?

I guess the screener reckoned it isn't difficult to find out that they're both Hawk T1A versions (according to scramble.nl).

Peter
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
 
JAT74L
Posts: 606
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 5:37 pm

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Sun Jun 11, 2006 8:56 am

I think the point here is that the previous uploads were accepted with the same info and the photographer now has a rejection for no reason apparent to himself.

When I upload I check to see the previous versions accepted and copy that info if multiple choices are available.

Frustrating.

Regards

John
I like trains just as much as planes but trains don't like the Atlantic!
 
9VSPO
Posts: 4187
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 9:03 pm

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Sun Jun 11, 2006 2:58 pm

Maybe it was an error and the wrong rejection box was ticked. Both look like they need some CW to me.
 
Psych
Topic Author
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Sun Jun 11, 2006 3:39 pm

Thanks so far.

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 1):
Uploaded as 'Hawk...'?

Peter - In the absence of anything else I think you may be right. But the fact of the matter is that this is the format that the database has indicated is the 'standardised' way to upload these aircraft. As such I have not uploaded any incorrect information. It would be completely wrong to penalise an uploader for using standardised information that the site itself provides, unless it is clearly incorrect.

Ian - I used the surface of the runway/taxiway as a horizontal reference, and both these are dead straight.

Any more thoughts? I am loathed to use an appeal only to further increase my rejection rate unless I am pretty sure of my situation.

Paul
 
malandan
Posts: 373
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:09 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:12 pm

Paul,

I have a feeling that should a screener have responded to your thread, almost certainly the phrase " as a long term uploader ......" would probably have been applied.
The A.net database contains a considerable number of errors and disparity's and I always treat the auto load function with a degree of mistrust. This, by the way, is not a criticism of our undoubtedly hard working and dedicated screeners, but a reflection of how complex is the total world of aviation, resulting in problems for both screeners and uploaders. I view it indicatively rather than definitively!
A recent thread of mine related to the question as to whether one should use the manufacturers or the builders name when uploading home built kit aircraft. The official response was indeed definitive stating that the kit manufacturer took precedence, but within days another Europa appeared in the database listing the plane by it's assemblers name! Unfortunate to my mind but maybe understandable in terms of the human condition!
Maybe I have too much time on my hands, but I seldom upload an image without checking one or more of the independent references, G-INFO, Scramble, etc, particularly on occasions where the auto load function offers more than one recommendation, and certainly in such a case as yours where "Hawk ..." clearly indicates incomplete info.
I have a Bulldog in the queue just now and the only image in the database lists it as "Bulldog" but to me it is clearly a "Bulldog T.1". How do I know, well I checked it out.
My advice to you Paul is to identify the correct designation and re-upload accordingly.
As you say yourself

Quoting Psych (Reply 4):
But the fact of the matter is that this is the format that the database has indicated is the 'standardised' way to upload these aircraft.

and I note the word "indicated.
It clearly is a problem and I sympathise particularly over the question of other similar images having been accepted.

Malcolm.
My interest lies in the future as I am going to spend the rest of my life there!
 
AirMalta
Posts: 400
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:02 pm

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:21 pm

Very nice shots Paul
Malcolm
 
Psych
Topic Author
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 1:19 am

Update:

I decided to appeal one of the shots, as I was still feeling rather flummoxed about what was wrong. I have just had the appeal rejected, again for 'info', but have not been left with any clarification what the problem is.

So I am none the wiser, I have an extra rejection against my name and am thinking a little lot about issues such as 'customer relations'.

Paul
 
User avatar
ptrjong
Posts: 4121
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:38 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 1:29 am

Quoting Psych (Reply 7):
I have just had the appeal rejected, again for 'info', but have not been left with any clarification what the problem is.

That sucks, and I don't know how aircraft designations with ... can be listed as STANDARDIZED.

However, the three dots clearly indicate that the aircraft version is unknown, and in this case, it obviously isn't.

You're better off not relying too much on the Auto Complete information.
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
 
Psych
Topic Author
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 1:50 am

Hi Peter.

What really upsets me here Peter is the lack of clarification - I feel as though there is a test that I am failing and the examiner is sitting back amused at my lack of success. Maybe a bit harsh, but it would have been so easy to help me out here.

The issue for me - as someone not very familiar with military aircraft - is that the Auto Complete provides three alternatives:

British Aerospace Hawk T1
BAe Hawk T1
British Aerospace Hawk...

Now I know that the Hawk is a T1, but the only standardised version of the information above is the last one - the others have not been seen to be fit by the database editors - for whatever reason - to be considered 'standardised'. Although I agree that the Auto Complete function is not foolproof, it looks for all the world that someone properly involved with the site information has decided to standardise this information using the last category as indicated above. Given a choice, I am sure I would not be the only one feeling that it would be the 'right' thing to do in such a complex database to upload using the information indicated to be 'standardised'.

To add to this impression, previously the database had lots of Hawk photos in various versions and names, but decided to lump all the shots together under the title 'British Aerospace Hawk', without model type.

I am just sad that something like this can feel so unpleasant............

Paul
 
timdegroot
Posts: 3258
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 10:37 pm

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 2:09 am

Quoting Psych (Reply 9):
British Aerospace Hawk T1

This would have been the correct one I think, in any case this British Aerospace Hawk... is not, just like 747-4.. is not correct.

Cheers
Tim
Alderman Exit
 
Psych
Topic Author
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 2:22 am

Quoting TimdeGroot (Reply 10):
This would have been the correct one I think, in any case this British Aerospace Hawk... is not

Thanks Tim - so why is this the standardised entry and the others not?

Paul
 
User avatar
JeffM
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 2:25 am

Based on simple observation, it should be...

British Aerospace Hawk T.1, as it does not have the AIM 9 pylons which would make it a T.1A. The Red Arrows now fly the T.1A version which is Sidewinder capable.

As shown clearly in this photo....

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alistair Bridges



The aircraft you photographed do not have them.

Quoting Psych (Reply 9):
What really upsets me here Peter is the lack of clarification

Think how the screener's feel having to reject the image when you could have properly identified the aircraft.

Quoting Psych (Reply 9):
I am just sad that something like this can feel so unpleasant............

I can't believe something like this upsets a grown man. Come on Paul, a little research on your part would have avoided the rejections.

[Edited 2006-06-11 19:43:12]
 
Psych
Topic Author
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 3:13 am

Quoting JeffM (Reply 12):
I can't believe something like this upsets a grown man. Come on Paul, a little research on your part would have avoided the rejections.

You make a valid point Jeff, but it does, all the same.

I had done my research, and accept it if I was in error, but the fact of the matter is that the 'correct' version of the information, as demanded by the screeners, is not deemed to be standard, according to the database editors - it is the incorrect information that has been labelled as 'standardised'. Given how things are here, it would be harsh to blame someone for going with what has been labelled 'standardised' by the crew, as this implies that the editors have actively decided that this should be the correct information. Also, the fact that the database has been changed such that all Hawk models are now in the category of 'Hawk...', irrespective of model, only further adds to this incorrect assumption.

The fact that recent uploads labelled using the exact same logic got through no problem also further tends to lull one in to a false sense of security, as this reinforces the belief that you are doing what is required of you.

But in the end your point is valid - things like this should not bother me. Too much time on A.net!

Paul
 
User avatar
MarkyMc
Crew
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 8:41 pm

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 3:38 am

Paul,

Just to clarify, XX220 is a Hawk T1A, whilst XX307 is a standard T1. I always check either an online reference such as the Scramble database, or a spotters serial book such as Military Aircraft Markings, which is updated every year.

Regards
Mark
 
User avatar
ptrjong
Posts: 4121
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:38 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 5:15 am

Quoting MarkyMc (Reply 14):
Just to clarify, XX220 is a Hawk T1A, whilst XX307 is a standard T1.

XX307 is indeed a standard T1, sorry, my mistake.

Quoting JeffM (Reply 12):
Based on simple observation, it should be... British Aerospace Hawk T.1, as it does not have the AIM 9 pylons which would make it a T.1A.

The T1A's pylons are not neccesarily fitted I suppose.
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
 
Psych
Topic Author
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:41 am

Quoting MarkyMc (Reply 14):
Just to clarify, XX220 is a Hawk T1A, whilst XX307 is a standard T1.

Thanks for that clarification Mark, and welcome to the Forum.

Maybe you will pass on to the database editors this problem with Hawk aircraft, as most of the registrations have the 'Hawk...' as the only standardised entry - the two aircraft versions you mention above are not considered 'standardised' and I could quote many more examples for RAF aircraft.

I say again - for all the world an uploader would be forgiven for thinking that the database editors are actively looking for uploaders to use the 'British Aerospace Hawk...' aircraft version, but maybe this has not been communicated to screeners.

On a related issue, if uploaders have photos rejected when using validated database information, is this then passed back to the database editors, or will these potential errors be allowed to continue?

Paul
 
User avatar
JeffM
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 8:21 am

Quoting Psych (Reply 16):
will these potential errors be allowed to continue?

Just put the proper information in in the first place Paul, you're blaming your rejection on someone else's laziness when you didn't do the research on your own image, which makes you....well.....lazy too.  Smile
 
Psych
Topic Author
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 3:31 pm

Quoting JeffM (Reply 17):
Just put the proper information in in the first place Paul, you're blaming your rejection on someone else's laziness when you didn't do the research on your own image, which makes you....well.....lazy too.

Jeff - I can't let a comment like that go - you are missing the point here again.

I was not lazy, in that I knew full well that the Hawk was a T1. My mistake was to trust the database and I allowed myself to be misled by the fact that the information I provided was the only option the database editors had seen fit to make standardised. This is not just the case with the photo(s) in question, but ALL Hawk registrations I have looked at. Thus, the database presents a list of all the versions that have been uploaded - for XX231 there are 6 possibilities - but the ONLY one marked as standardised for the purposes of uploading is 'British Aerospace Hawk...'

Though I haven't checked, my hunch is that in other areas this would not be the case - e.g. in Tim's quoted example, I would know not to upload a 747 - 436 as 7474-4.., because I bet the 747-436 aircraft version has also been deemed to be standardised.

It is wrong to trust the database - a shame, but understandable given the workload involved - but here it looks for all the world that an ACTIVE decision has been taken to encourage uploaders to use this specific information - hence why not also have the correct versions standardised. They are there. I guess the answer is time and resources, and I have sympathy with this. My mistake was to develop a coherent reasoning in my mind - relating to an attempt to pull together masses of different possibilities, some incorrect - that allowed me, yes, incorrectly, to think that I was doing the right thing. We have a name for this normal way of thinking in psychology. Those of us interested in aviation and human factors involved in incidents are very familiar with this. To then have the experience of previous uploads have been deemed acceptable only further reinforced this view.

I try not to get involved in making derogatory statements about people on a public Forum - I prefer not to have this done about me too.

Paul
 
User avatar
JeffM
Posts: 7569
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:32 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:26 pm

Quoting Psych (Reply 18):
I try not to get involved in making derogatory statements about people on a public Forum - I prefer not to have this done about me too.

Hardly derogatory Paul, just an observation. If you knew for sure what it was, then upload it as such, any thing else is a weak excuse.
 
brianw999
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:15 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:22 am

Quoting Ptrjong (Reply 15):
I always check either an online reference such as the Scramble database,

Afraid I have to agree. It took me less than 2 minutes to check the two reg's as being a T1A and a T1 on "scramble".
 
User avatar
jid
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 7:37 pm

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Tue Jun 13, 2006 12:54 am

I think one of the points Paul is trying to make is the lack of constancy. Paul may have got a rejection for slightly incorrect information which he believed had been added correctly by the auto fill. Next thing he looks at his local airport and sees an A321 added with no C/N and no version and yet there it is accepted! It took me 30 seconds to find the missing info for this aircraft, which would not of been added by the auto fill as it is a recently re-registered aircraft.

Jid.
G7EPN is back after 15 years! Operating all Bands 80mtrs -> 70cms QRZ DX
 
User avatar
ptrjong
Posts: 4121
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:38 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:55 am

Quoting Jid (Reply 21):
lack of constancy

Yes there is. But on one hand, it's important for the database for the information provided to be as complete and correct as possible. And on the other hand, with an upload queue of two weeks, I'm kind of glad that screeners don't check the data for each photo completely thorougly.

It's quite simple really. If you don't provide complete and correct data, you may get away with it, but you do run the risk of a rejection.
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
 
Psych
Topic Author
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:55 am

Hello All.

For the sake of completeness, here are the photos complete with full and correct information:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Markman
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Paul Markman


Thanks to the screeners for not finding anything else to fault this time around  wink - I shall not be making that error again (I hope). Thanks also to everyone for your feedback with this item.

Take care.

Paul
 
User avatar
jumbojim747
Posts: 2426
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 8:05 pm

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:10 pm

Lovely shots Paul and great to see them in the DB .
Cheers
On a wing and a prayer
 
malandan
Posts: 373
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 1:09 am

RE: Rejected For 'Info' - Your Help Please

Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:03 pm

I have been contacted by a fellow Anetter who has asked me to correct an error in my previous response where I listed the aircraft type for a recent upload.

He makes the point that ........

UK military aircraft uploaded to Airliners.net should not have the dot that appears between type and numerical sequence. So in your example:
Bulldog T.1 is incorrect.
Bulldog T1 is correct.

However, on examining the database I am clearly not alone as numerous examples exist among many aircraft types. The effect of this is to create a "false" variant for what is clearly the identical aircraft type.

As he points out .......

"As well as risking possible rejection, it will also have to be corrected some day by an editor, increasing their workload."

I would suggest that sceeners should consider a little less leniency in the interests of us all.

Malcolm.
My interest lies in the future as I am going to spend the rest of my life there!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos