KFLLCFII
Posts: 3174
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 7:08 am

RE: Acceptable Uploads?

Tue Jul 04, 2006 11:31 am

First one:

-Oversharpened,
-Slightly to the right in the frame

Second one:

-Oversharpened
-Low in the frame
-Needs slight counter-clockwise rotation (0.4-0.5 degrees)

-Bryan
"About the only way to look at it, just a pity you are not POTUS KFLLCFII, seems as if we would all be better off."
 
OlegShv
Posts: 603
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 7:22 am

RE: Acceptable Uploads?

Tue Jul 04, 2006 11:45 am

Richard,

737 seems a tad oversharpened.

The second one is also oversharpened and a little low in the frame.

Regards,

Oleg.
 
azza40
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:18 am

RE: Acceptable Uploads?

Fri Jul 07, 2006 6:04 am

The sky looks grainy on number 1

Aaron  sly 
Not been on here for a good 2/3 years!
 
aero145
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:59 am

RE: Acceptable Uploads?

Fri Jul 07, 2006 10:52 am

I agree with the previous posts.

And I think the 737 shot will get a motive rejection, as the people around the aircraft aren't very nice to look at.  Silly
 
eadster
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:31 pm

RE: Acceptable Uploads?

Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:03 pm

Looks like "sharpen" has been used instead of USM. Might get better results with the USM.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests