User avatar
Parsival
Topic Author
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:08 am

First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Again Need Help

Thu Jul 06, 2006 7:40 am

Dear screener(s),

this one
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ections/big/20060705_psc1661_2.jpg
was rejected first for dirty and only for dirty and I asked for help to find the dust spots in this thread:
Dirty Rejection - Can't Find The Dust Spot (by Parsival Jun 20 2006 in Aviation Photography)

Bad info was never the issue. But now my re-upload was rejected again but now for bad info - I do not understand this. I searched the database and can't find a difference between my infos and the infos to the existing pictures of this aircraft/reg. So I have to ask you what info do you mean?

Thanks,
Bjoern
sorry for my broken english...
 
User avatar
ptrjong
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:38 am

RE: First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Again Need Help

Thu Jul 06, 2006 7:56 am

Bjoern,

Please post the info you uploaded.

Peter
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
 
User avatar
Parsival
Topic Author
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:08 am

RE: First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Again Need Help

Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:40 am

Here is the info:

Binter Canarias (Naysa)
Beech 1900D
Beech 1900 (C-12)
Lanzarote (- Arrecife) (ACE / GCRR)
Spain, May 7, 2006
Reg: EC-JBT
Code:
Cn: UE-308
Categories: AIRLINER

Bjoern
sorry for my broken english...
 
User avatar
ptrjong
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:38 am

RE: First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Again Need Help

Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:57 am

Looks OK to me.  scratchchin 
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
 
User avatar
Parsival
Topic Author
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:08 am

RE: First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Need Help A

Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:52 pm

Could a screener please have a look at this problem? I have still no idea (and apparently others have not too) what the bad info could be.

Thanks,
Bjoern
sorry for my broken english...
 
User avatar
ptrjong
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:38 am

RE: First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Again Need Help

Sat Jul 08, 2006 4:43 pm

I guess I'd appeal this one.
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
 
User avatar
Parsival
Topic Author
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:08 am

RE: First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Again Need Help

Sat Jul 08, 2006 6:03 pm

I agree with you Peter but I want to wait one day longer. Perhaps someone could give me a hint or the screener who rejected this photo can give me the answer. Do you know how many days after a photo's rejection one can appeal it? I think there is a limit of time isn't it?

Bjoern
sorry for my broken english...
 
User avatar
ptrjong
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:38 am

RE: First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Again Need Help

Sun Jul 09, 2006 8:02 am

Bjoern,

I'm not sure how it works but I can currently appeal rejections of up to a month old (press 'Show more photos (my last 50 rejections)')
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
 
User avatar
Parsival
Topic Author
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:08 am

RE: First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Again Need Help

Sun Jul 09, 2006 5:28 pm

I decided to appeal it now. Thank you Peter for your help!
Bjoern
sorry for my broken english...
 
User avatar
Parsival
Topic Author
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:08 am

RE: First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Again Need Help

Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:43 pm

The headscreener sent me an email and asked, which reg is the right one, EC-JBT on the wing or EC-JPT on the tail. I answered that it is EC-JBT and the "P" on the tail was caused by a sun reflexion. That was on sunday and since then nothing new happened. I hope the headscreener received my answer because I received another email that confuses me a little bit:

**********************************************
** THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY **
** YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE **
**********************************************

The original message was received at Sun, 9 Jul 2006 23:15:57 +0200 from mx2.luth.se [130.240.42.12]

----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... Deferred: Connection refused by airliners.net.
Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours Will keep trying until message is 3 days old

Does anybody have an idea what this means??
Bjoern
sorry for my broken english...
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Again Need Help

Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:25 pm

Quoting Parsival (Reply 9):
Does anybody have an idea what this means??

It means that the Anet server was overloaded and could not accept your message. Nothing sinister about it.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
AirMalta
Posts: 400
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:02 pm

RE: First Bad Dirty And Now Bad Info - Again Need Help

Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:34 am

that message happened to me too last week
malcolm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests