sulman
Posts: 1963
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 5:09 am

Would A.net Go For This Motive?

Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:03 pm

Trying to find some different angles in the statics at FFD, I tried this. I thought it looks quite dramatic, or do I just have sunstroke?


Cheers

James
It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
 
chris78cpr
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 7:44 am

RE: Would A.net Go For This Motive?

Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:51 pm

Nice photo James. hopefully a screener will chime in soona dn give their opinion! they are the only ones who can give a definitive answer.

Chris
5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
 
User avatar
eksath
Crew
Posts: 1295
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 6:19 am

RE: Would A.net Go For This Motive?

Mon Jul 17, 2006 12:37 am

Quoting Sulman (Thread starter):
I thought it looks quite dramatic, or do I just have sunstroke?

I like it conceptually. Hope it gets in. Have you tried a tighter crop..maybe loose a fraction from all four sides (just trying to reduce clutter while preserving the emphasis on the boom and the tail engine)...my two cents.  Smile
World Wide Aerospace Photography
 
mhodgson
Posts: 4673
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2002 8:47 pm

RE: Would A.net Go For This Motive?

Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:08 am

It's one of those which will either be rejected, or will make top of the day/photographers choice.

I like it, though.
No trees were harmed by this message. However, several million electrons were terribly inconvenienced

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests