Topic Author
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:45 am

Is This Bad Motive?

Sun Oct 01, 2006 11:42 am

The A320's winglet is partially covered by PU's ATR's horizontal stabilizer...

In case it is a motive rejection... Is this one OK?
Gripped 7D + Sigma 10-20mm + 17-40L + 50mm f/1.8 II + 70-200mm f/4L IS + EF 400mm f/5.6L + 580EX II
Posts: 1507
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:21 pm

RE: Is This Bad Motive?

Sun Oct 01, 2006 11:48 am

Not bad motive but.....washout a bit......
Did You Ever Think Freedom Could Be this Bad
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:31 pm

RE: Is This Bad Motive?

Sun Oct 01, 2006 1:07 pm

Both shots quality and jaggered
Posts: 5546
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:43 am

RE: Is This Bad Motive?

Sun Oct 01, 2006 6:16 pm


Others have commented on the quality issues, as for motive I am not sure the ATR stab in photo 1 is an absolute motive killer but that may just be me(and there are many reasons I am not a screener here!).
Having said that, in Photography, attention to detail and timing is everything. I was going to say you could have stepped to the right about half a metre and not had that problem or, as I noticed the plane is under power and moving, waited a tiny fraction of a second and taken the shot.

Those are easy things to say in hindsight but it is all a learning experience.

If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Masataka1430, notaxonrotax and 4 guests