manc
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:33 am

Rejects With New Lens

Mon Nov 06, 2006 2:43 am

Alright chaps

Had a few rejections with my new lens the 70-200 IS L F2.8 compared to when I use my 100-400. I agree with the oversharpened rejections as I had a bad day at the office (so to speak) and just did my usual workflow and not paying to much attention to details! My rejections are posted below with my new edits for comments.

Its really surprising how much sharper the 70-200 is and how that is reflected in the need to change workflow methods.

Here we go rejections

1 - Oversharpened

and heres my edited update - any better?

2 Oversharpened

and heres my edited update - any better?

3 - This one got a quality but I'm not sure if its worth an appeal? screener comments welcome.
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...ig/20061105_JA8902_291006_LHRa.jpg

4 - This one quality and oversharpened, I think the heat haze may have killed the quality?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...big/20061104_JA8902_291006_LHR.jpg
No URL in signature please
 
ksupilot
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:27 am

RE: Rejects With New Lens

Mon Nov 06, 2006 3:18 am

The second oversharpened looks like it has improved. Might be worth another shot.
 
Psych
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: Rejects With New Lens

Mon Nov 06, 2006 3:34 am

Hi Ian.

You now have a very enviable range of lenses there!

I agree with the rejections - those first two are definitely oversharpened. You have definitely improved on that in the newer edits, but I would still watch out - The NZ lighting is not great and still the wing leading edge looks a bit oversharpened.

As regards the others, there is little detail in the forward fuselage of the first JAL, plus the black lettering has jaggies. In the second, despite the jet efflux, I think there are other issues - the red winglet looks oversaturated and has grain, and there looks to be some artifacts of editing in other areas - e.g. nose area and engines. Did you select the plane here? If so it appears like a problem with feathering - the edges look a bit too soft for the engine, and jagged for the nose/flightdeck.

Take care.

Paul
 
lasham
Crew
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 5:43 am

RE: Rejects With New Lens

Mon Nov 06, 2006 3:55 am

Quoting Psych (Reply 2):
The NZ lighting is not great

No sun no fun!

Tony
No sun no fun
 
cosec59
Posts: 2618
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 2:59 am

RE: Rejects With New Lens

Mon Nov 06, 2006 3:59 am

Quoting Manc (Thread starter):
Had a few rejections with my new lens the 70-200 IS L F2.8

Well give it to me. Your problems will be solved
Rules are for the obedience of fools but for the guidance of wise men
 
manc
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:33 am

RE: Rejects With New Lens

Mon Nov 06, 2006 4:05 am

Hey Paul,

Aye I have zero in the bank account aswell! I've taken to begging  

Thanks for the comments as usual.
I uploaded the ANZ as DARK so I figured this was alright and I think your right about the edge of the wing, I'll sort that.

The JAL close up I think I'll bin as the cropping make it a bit noisey.

heres the JAL side on, tried to get a bit more detail at the front

http://www.iesphotography.co.uk/JA8902_291006_LHRb.jpg

Tony, should I skip the ANZ ?

Phil.....not the lens mate its me!

[Edited 2006-11-05 20:07:51]
No URL in signature please
 
cosec59
Posts: 2618
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 2:59 am

RE: Rejects With New Lens

Mon Nov 06, 2006 4:17 am

Quoting Manc (Reply 5):
Phil.....not the lens mate its me!

And we know why don't we.
Old scary AND posh spice within 17 hours.
You bad lad  Wink
Rules are for the obedience of fools but for the guidance of wise men
 
manc
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:33 am

RE: Rejects With New Lens

Mon Nov 06, 2006 5:07 am

Quoting Lasham (Reply 3):
No sun no fun!



Quoting Cosec59 (Reply 6):
And we know why don't we.
Old scary AND posh spice within 17 hours.
You bad lad

 Wink ......

OK I'll give the World Airways a shot and scrap the rest.
No URL in signature please
 
lasham
Crew
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 5:43 am

RE: Rejects With New Lens

Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:15 am

Quoting Manc (Reply 5):
Tony, should I skip the ANZ ?

Yes skip the NZ (your get it better one day soon)

The JAL & WO are good shots, so lets see them back on soon.

Tony
No sun no fun
 
aero145
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:59 am

RE: Rejects With New Lens

Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:43 am

Quoting Lasham (Reply 3):
No sun no fun!

Ohh, Tony!!!

I'll get ya tomorrow.  stirthepot 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos