san747
Posts: 4347
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:03 am

Which One Should I Go For Next?

Mon Nov 06, 2006 8:39 am

I'm a little disappointed about this rejection (quality):

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...ain?filename=20061105_IMG_1261.jpg

But, alas, I will move on... I have a couple other shots that I'm confident of, but I only have one upload slot now available... Which one looks like it has the best chance?







Thank you all!
Scotty doesn't know...
 
D L X
Posts: 11701
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: Which One Should I Go For Next?

Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:46 am

I think all those shots are soft. What editing are you doing? I'd add a bit of USM.
 
FlightShadow
Posts: 1060
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 4:43 pm

RE: Which One Should I Go For Next?

Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:50 am

Of all of those I would pick the American Eagle Saab. All the others have some quality issues, but I think the Saab stands a chance.
"When the tide goes out, you can tell who was skinnydipping."
 
TedTAce
Posts: 9098
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 12:31 am

RE: Which One Should I Go For Next?

Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:56 am

Personally I don't like the aft quartering shots with the sun setting from behind the A/C. Seems like the shots have more a 'hey it was the end of the day and I didn't fell like working' type of attitude then a professional photographer trying to take quality shots.
This space intentionally left blank
 
san747
Posts: 4347
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:03 am

RE: Which One Should I Go For Next?

Mon Nov 06, 2006 3:26 pm

Quoting FlightShadow (Reply 2):
Of all of those I would pick the American Eagle Saab... I think the Saab stands a chance.

I'll bet the fact that there is only 1 other shot of that particular airframe on the DB will help, won't it? I'll go for it...

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3):
Personally I don't like the aft quartering shots with the sun setting from behind the A/C. Seems like the shots have more a 'hey it was the end of the day and I didn't fell like working' type of attitude then a professional photographer trying to take quality shots.

I took those shots because of the great lighting at the time... I'm no professional (yet), but I'm trying to be given my limitations...

Quoting D L X (Reply 1):

I think all those shots are soft. What editing are you doing? I'd add a bit of USM.

I edit with Photoshop Elements 2.0. I tried some additional USM on the F9 landing shot and it got some mad jaggies, so I'm kind of reluctant to try it on the other shots...
Scotty doesn't know...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos