DLX737200
Topic Author
Posts: 1617
Joined: Tue May 29, 2001 6:42 am

NOA_dirty For Stars In Night Sky

Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:41 pm

This shot got rejected tonight:

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...108_N924DLIDLEMCO.jpg&appealed=yes


It was rejected for dirty because of the two stars in the shot said to be broken pixels by the screener who rejected it. I even put in my comment something like, "...sitting under the stars" since two stars were noticeable in the shot. What do you all think?

-Justin

[Edited 2006-11-08 08:49:23]
 
IL76
Posts: 2237
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 5:43 am

RE: NOA_dirty For Stars In Night Sky

Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:53 pm

Appeal? It's easier than typing out this whole forum post and probably sorts things out without a fuss...
 
DLX737200
Topic Author
Posts: 1617
Joined: Tue May 29, 2001 6:42 am

RE: NOA_dirty For Stars In Night Sky

Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:00 pm

I just did, thus the edit of the post. However, I messed up and clicked the appeal without typing a reason for the appeal. How can I fix this IL76?
 
dendrobatid
Posts: 1639
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 3:40 pm

RE: NOA_dirty For Stars In Night Sky

Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:52 pm

Quoting DLX737200 (Reply 2):
I just did, thus the edit of the post. However, I messed up and clicked the appeal without typing a reason for the appeal. How can I fix this IL76?

Damon,
You can't fix that and, as you know, if no justification is given for the appeal it is rejected.
I would suggest removing the appeal before it costs you another 2% on your acceptances and start all over again
Mick Bajcar
 
DLX737200
Topic Author
Posts: 1617
Joined: Tue May 29, 2001 6:42 am

RE: NOA_dirty For Stars In Night Sky

Thu Nov 09, 2006 2:42 am

Well too late for that. It was already rejected for dirty again. I do not understand why screeners cannot see the comment mentioning the stars then reject it for those stars because they assume they are broken pixels.

In addition, I had a friend upload a shot once with bees in the shot and it initally got rejected for dirty as well but after a head screener realized it, they had him reupload it and accepted it immediately because they realized it wasn't dust or broken pixels. How come this cannot be done to this photo? I'd really just like to see this photo be in the database without having to wait another week.

-Justin

[Edited 2006-11-08 18:44:20]
 
aero145
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:59 am

RE: NOA_dirty For Stars In Night Sky

Thu Nov 09, 2006 3:21 am

Quoting Dendrobatid (Reply 3):
Damon

Mick;

DLX is Damon (Marcus Lewis)
but
DLX737200 is Justin Idle.  Smile

Just to sort things out...
 
D L X
Posts: 11629
Joined: Thu May 27, 1999 3:30 am

RE: NOA_dirty For Stars In Night Sky

Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:15 am

Quoting Aero145 (Reply 5):
DLX is Damon (Marcus Lewis)
but
DLX737200 is Justin Idle.

This is true.
 
maiznblu_757
Posts: 4952
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2002 12:05 pm

RE: NOA_dirty For Stars In Night Sky

Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:23 am

All together now:

[Chorus:]

Starlight, starbright first star I see tonight
Starlight, [starbright] make everything all right
Starlight, starbright first star I see tonight
Starlight, [starbright] yeah
 
AdamWright
Posts: 602
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 2:58 pm

RE: NOA_dirty For Stars In Night Sky

Thu Nov 09, 2006 10:48 am

YOu da man Idle!  Silly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests