User avatar
acontador
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 11:54 pm

Rejected For Quality

Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:54 am

These two were rejected for "quality" (first one also for centered, but that can easily be fixed), but my tyred old eyes seem to be unable to find the quality problems.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...720061010A1611024101006PR_GOTb.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...20060919A0111024220906CC_CSHbb.jpg

I would very much appreciate your guidance here to find the quality problems and see if they can be fixed.
Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
 
Fly747
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:03 am

RE: Rejected For Quality

Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:18 am

Hi Andres,

I believe the quality rejection comes from the common subject, a LAN 737 taking off which probably requires a top notch quality to be accepted. The weather wasn't favourable that day either which contributes to your picture not being crisp.
Not sure about the GOL, the quality looks good to me.

Ivan
 
TransIsland
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 9:22 pm

RE: Rejected For Quality

Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:58 am

The LAN has massive halos around it.

Not sure about the GOL, I'm on the wrong screen.
I'm an aviation expert. I have Sky Juice for breakfast.
 
9V
Posts: 1368
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:35 am

RE: Rejected For Quality

Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:54 am

The LAN looks grainy/dirty probably due to the bad weather.

I could be wrong but on the GOL there appears to be a dark line down the front of the tail or maybe it's just over-sharpened.
 
eadster
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:31 pm

RE: Rejected For Quality

Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:19 am

GOL looks ok but I'm on my notebook...

The LAN is grainy, low quality and soft in places. Keep that one for the personal collection.
 
Lanas
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:27 am

RE: Rejected For Quality

Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:10 pm

Andres

The LAN picture looks pretty oversharpened and blurry on a couple of places. Also I would place the aircraft a little lower on the frame.
The GOL picture is very nice and it´s an angle that is not very frequently shot at SCL. I see some parts a little jagged, though (inner flap section and fin livery).
Hope it helps.  thumbsup 

Cheers!
Lanas.-
"Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens." J.R.R. Tolkien
 
User avatar
acontador
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 11:54 pm

RE: Rejected For Quality

Wed Nov 22, 2006 9:38 pm

Well, many thanks to Ivan, TransIsland, Ian, Martin and Gaston for your feedback - as usual highly appreciated!
Have to be honest, the LAN 737 was the fourth (!) attempt at uploading this picture, previously been rejected for contrast. While I appreciate the quality issues on it, it is just such a difficult and rare picture to get, since rotation at Rwy 17L at SCL is usually way much further away, but this 737 was apparently very lightly loaded and it started take-off roll at the very end of a cold morning, all factors which helped to have it flying just above the tower from this angle. So, I got the message and will not try again, and screeners will probably miss this picture in the queue  Wink !
Now, regarding the Gol, the only thing I can see is some slight grain in the sky, which I can basically do nothing to improve, so I went to another shot from the series to upload. In any case, this is still for me somewhat of a puzzling rejection...  scratchchin 
Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests