spencer
Posts: 1518
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 8:30 pm

Rejection Input Please.

Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:46 pm

Just had this one rejjed for quality/grainy. I honestly believe it's good enough to be added; do you guys think it's worth the appeal function? Should we really have to squint our eyes 3 inches from the screen to see if there's a lack in quality?? Come on.......
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...jections/big/20070621_GEUPAsjw.jpg
Spencer.
EOS1D4, 7D, 30D, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, 70-200/2.8 L IS2 USM, 17-40 f4 L USM, 24-105 f4 L IS USM, 85 f1.8 USM
 
eadster
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:31 pm

RE: Rejection Input Please.

Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:16 pm

I think the quality can be a little better, but I can't see the grain at all.

So no, don't appeal.
 
KLM772ER
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 5:29 pm

RE: Rejection Input Please.

Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:20 pm

Quoting Eadster (Reply 1):
but I can't see the grain at all.

Just have a look at the blue at the bottom of the fuselage... especially in front of the wing. Or the bottom of the wing..
There is a lot of grain visible  Wink

Yep don't appeal, it is not worth with this shot...

regards
Björn
 
diezel
Posts: 622
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 6:50 pm

RE: Rejection Input Please.

Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:29 pm

The crop could also be a bit tighter.

Roel.
Never be afraid of what you like. (Miles Davis)
 
spencer
Posts: 1518
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 8:30 pm

RE: Rejection Input Please.

Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:48 pm

Quoting KLM772ER (Reply 2):
There is a lot of grain visible

Well you've better eyes than me then as I can't see it! Back to the squinting then I guess! Perhaps I shoud've uploaded a nice side on of this a/c.... Bit of originality and it gets knocked for quality/grain/whatever. Cheers.
Spencer.
EOS1D4, 7D, 30D, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, 70-200/2.8 L IS2 USM, 17-40 f4 L USM, 24-105 f4 L IS USM, 85 f1.8 USM
 
Granite
Posts: 5026
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 5:55 pm

RE: Rejection Input Please.

Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:59 pm

Spencer

There are currently 72 images of this aircraft in the database.

Unfortunately the quality of your upload is a little under par. Some grain and titles look oversharpened, compensating for blur possibly?

Regards

Gary
 
KLM772ER
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 5:29 pm

RE: Rejection Input Please.

Thu Jun 21, 2007 8:59 pm

Quoting Spencer (Reply 4):
Bit of originality and it gets knocked for quality/grain/whatever

 checkmark  have to agree here.. Got this photo rejected for being oversharpened..

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 682 File size: 516kb


It appeared this way right after downsizing in steps... and is not sharpened at all, in fact it is even a bit blurred at the wings
Still a bit cheerless about it, but happens...

regards
Björn
 
User avatar
GVerbeeck
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:34 am

RE: Rejection Input Please.

Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:03 pm

Spencer,

Sorry to say it is grainy under the wings, and the quality is not there (parts soft and titles oversharpened) most likely due to heat haze.

No need to appeal this shot.

Quoting Spencer (Reply 4):
Perhaps I shoud've uploaded a nice side on of this a/c.... Bit of originality and it gets knocked for quality/grain/whatever.

So this isn't a side-on? Big grin

Grts,
Giovanni
 
NIKV69
Posts: 10890
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:27 am

RE: Rejection Input Please.

Thu Jun 21, 2007 10:21 pm

Quoting Granite (Reply 5):
There are currently 72 images of this aircraft in the database.

Unfortunately the quality of your upload is a little under par. Some grain and titles look oversharpened, compensating for blur possibly?

Beat me too it. There are a ton of pics of BA with that type. Has to be a little better quality.
Hey that guy with the private jet can bail us out! Why? HE CAN AFFORD IT!
 
PUnmuth@VIE
Posts: 3119
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2000 9:31 pm

RE: Rejection Input Please.

Thu Jun 21, 2007 10:41 pm

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 8):
There are a ton of pics of BA with that type.

Type does not matter in any way, because

Quoting Granite (Reply 5):
There are currently 72 images of this aircraft in the database.

means there are 72 images of this particular registration in the database.
-
 
INNflight
Posts: 3526
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 5:11 am

RE: Rejection Input Please.

Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:10 am

Quoting KLM772ER (Reply 2):
There is A LOT of grain visible

Yeah sure.... never seen a ASA 200 shot on film then...  Embarrassment

I can see that the quality is not really good though, better luck next time Spencer  

[Edited 2007-06-21 17:12:22]
Jet Visuals
 
KLM772ER
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 5:29 pm

RE: Rejection Input Please.

Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:26 am

Quoting INNflight (Reply 10):
Yeah sure.... never seen a ASA 200 shot on film then... Embarrassment

The grain intensity of a ASA 200 picture is definitely higher than in this shot (and yes I have seen them  Wink )

I would have better said there are a few places where you can see some grain in that shot.. thats what I meant....

Björn
 
spencer
Posts: 1518
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 8:30 pm

RE: Rejection Input Please.

Fri Jun 22, 2007 2:16 am

Thanks for the input. FYI she was banking out of 09R/LHR and left the gear down to cool the brakes. I thought it was a pretty neat shot but it goes to show even after 25 years passionately shooting aircraft I've still got things to learn when it comes to this site! Go figure! Seems we're all being turned and moulded into something, at least me anyway, I wasn't originally! The scrutinising eyes of the screeners, (on whose guidelines they follow, I don't know!) pick the tiniest (if there are any at all) inconsistencies and reject an image at the drop of a hat. The site definitely has and is becoming more and more confined with regards to uploading. Am I moaning? Yeah! So, take it however you want. I'm probably speaking for the majority of the uploaders out there when I say there's been some real crap added lately, that basically gives me every right to query a rejection.
Spencer.
Venting.
EOS1D4, 7D, 30D, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, 70-200/2.8 L IS2 USM, 17-40 f4 L USM, 24-105 f4 L IS USM, 85 f1.8 USM

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests