damien846
Posts: 629
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:45 am

Another Motive Question...........................

Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:11 pm

Hello again,
Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 683 File size: 772kb

Just rough edit, but what about the motive.
Cheers
Damien
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 4959
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:38 pm

I like it. I'd give it a try.
Airliners.net Crew - Photo Screener
 
diezel
Posts: 622
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 6:50 pm

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:54 pm

Very nice motive! But you need to correct the bad case of chromatic aberration best visible along the trailing edge of the tail. It's very visible and I don't think it will get through the screening process as it is.

Roel.
Never be afraid of what you like. (Miles Davis)
 
bubbles
Crew
Posts: 1124
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:54 am

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:31 pm

Hi Damien

The motive of this shot is okay.

_Hongyin_
 
Fly747
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:03 am

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:45 pm

I would crop it at 4:3 to give it some space on top and bottom.

Ivan
 
User avatar
ptrjong
Posts: 4102
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:38 am

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:06 am

Quoting Fly747 (Reply 4):
I would crop it at 4:3 to give it some space on top and bottom.

Good idea, but mostly on top and just a little at the bottom I'd say.

Peter Smile
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
 
Scotland1979
Crew
Posts: 331
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:19 am

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:40 am

It is motive shot! It would be shame to learn that it is not motive. I have my photos were rejected due to not motive and the same photos on other websites that someone bought them (how can they are not motive) I think "no motive or motive" should not be an issue on this website.
Jesus said "I am the Way and the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me" - John 14:6
 
unattendedbag
Posts: 2154
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 10:35 pm

RE: Another Motive Question.......................

Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:09 am

what about the quality issues?
Slower traffic, keep right
 
Fly747
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:03 am

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:26 am

Quoting Unattendedbag (Reply 7):
what about the quality issues?



Quoting Damien846 (Thread starter):
Just rough edit, but what about the motive.

Ivan
 
damien846
Posts: 629
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:45 am

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:00 pm

Quoting Bubbles (Reply 3):
The motive of this shot is okay.

Thanks Hongyin,
Does it need much more editing?
Cheers
Damien
 
damien846
Posts: 629
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:45 am

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:11 pm

Quoting Diezel (Reply 2):
But you need to correct the bad case of chromatic aberration best visible along the trailing edge of the tail. It's very visible and I don't think it will get through the screening process as it is.

Whats the best way to fix this?
regards
Damien
 
bubbles
Crew
Posts: 1124
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:54 am

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:57 am

Quoting Damien846 (Reply 9):
Does it need much more editing?

Hi Damien

This edition looks slightly blurry and oversharpened. I also see some purple fringes (chromatic aberration). So I would suggest doing another editing to it with carefully using selective sharpening in order to avoid jaggies.

_Hongyin_
 
diezel
Posts: 622
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 6:50 pm

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:48 pm

Quoting Damien846 (Reply 10):
Whats the best way to fix this?

The fringing is caused by your lens. It happens usually with average quality lenses in high contrast situations or with high quality lenses with teleconverters attached.

I know that Photoshop CS2 has a filter in the menu filter->Distort->lens correction which is quite able to correct the CA for you.

Roel.
Never be afraid of what you like. (Miles Davis)
 
AMSA
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:20 am

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:55 pm

Hi Damien

I'd do what Bubbles wrote - do some selective sharpening - and use the filter in PS in order to correct the CA (Chromatic Aberration), just like Roel wrote too!

Btw, the CA gets higher when we use high aperture (f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6) (combined with high zoom it gets even more higher!).
Of course this doesn't happen with high quality lenses  Wink

Regards,
Allen A.
Best regards from LIS, Allen Azevedo
 
damien846
Posts: 629
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:45 am

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:40 am

Thanks Guys,
Will have a go at it latter.
Cheers
Damien
 
aviopic
Posts: 2423
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 7:52 pm

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:10 am

Quoting AMSA (Reply 13):
Of course this doesn't happen with high quality lenses

So the Canon 24-105/4 IS L isn't a high quality lens ?
Nice to get some conformation for something I am telling you for a long time Big grin
The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
 
AMSA
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:20 am

RE: Another Motive Question...........................

Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:25 am

Aviopic,
Well, that's a highQ lens because of the glass (L) yes  Smile

I didn't make myself clear.
What I wanted to say is that, generally, highQ tele-zoom lens (L) have lower CA, while the highQ wide-zoom have higher CA, regardless if they are L glass  Yeah sure  Wink
Best regards from LIS, Allen Azevedo

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests