User avatar
Buyantukhaa
Posts: 2289
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 5:33 am

Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:52 am

Hi all,

After considering the Canon 28-135 and 24-105L, I realised I wanted something wider than 24mm, and cover the tele end by a 70-200 f/4L (still to be purchased). I've been reading mixed reviews on the Canon 17-85, and quite reasonable ones about the Sigma 17-70, did anybody compare them? Any thoughts, experiences?
I scratch my head, therefore I am.
 
chris78cpr
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 7:44 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:38 am

My dad has the 17-85 and really likes it. Ive used it and it's nice but not perfect.

I havn't heard anything but praise for the Sigma. Go with the 17-70.

Chris
5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
 
aero145
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:59 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:53 pm

Chris's right, Siggy wins. No IS and 15mm less range but better optics.
 
martin54
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:05 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:55 pm

During my Canon days I have owned the 17-85 and it was the worst lens I have ever had. Probably I had an extra bad copy but the general opinion on this lens is not very positive, especially if you look at the rather hefty price tag for a consumer lens.
My experience with Sigma is a lot better and I am considering the 17-70 myself to replace my ancient and rattling Nikkor 18-70.
 
User avatar
Bruce
Posts: 4934
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 2:46 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:22 pm

The Canon 17-85 tends to have a lot of barrel distortion at the wider ranges. How is the Sigma?

I have the 17-85 and its just ok.

Bruce
Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
 
mfz
Posts: 212
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:54 pm

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:27 pm

Keep away from the Canon 17-85 IS! After having had good results with the EF-S 10-22 as my first EF-S lens in a line-up of L-series-lenses (17-40L, 100-400L) I decided to try the EF-S 17-85. The worst lens I've ever owned! Massive barrel distortion, completely unsharp at 17-30mm, soft contrast, etc.! Borrowed a 24-105L from am colleague for my recent New Zealand-trip and I am totally happy with it! My recommendation: get yourself a 24-105L and enjoy some really nice photos!

Cheers,
Mike
Extra Bavariam non est vita et si est non est ita! --- My flights: http://my.flightmemory.com/mfz
 
SNATH
Posts: 3049
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:23 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Fri Nov 30, 2007 5:40 pm



Quoting Mfz (Reply 5):
My recommendation: get yourself a 24-105L and enjoy some really nice photos!

I have this and it's a great great lens. BUT on a 1.6x body, you need something wider than 24 in a lot of cases. I compliment it with the 17-40 and the combination is awesome. However, I wouldn't have the 24-105L as my only lens on a 1.6x body. It's just not wide enough. For me at least.

Tony
Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
 
User avatar
dvincent
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:53 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Fri Nov 30, 2007 5:55 pm

There is also the third option of the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8. Not as long but it's f/2.8 all the way through and tack sharp. Combine it with a circular polarizer and you get awesome results.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dan Vincent



I hear the new Canon 18-55 IS is kicking butt and taking names in the image quality department, which is very surprising considering it's just a kit lens but it looks like a really good deal if you're broke and don't mind plasticky build quality.

[Edited 2007-11-30 10:00:33]
From the Mind of Minolta
 
User avatar
Buyantukhaa
Posts: 2289
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 5:33 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:09 pm



Quoting Mfz (Reply 5):
Keep away from the Canon 17-85 IS!

I will, it seems the recommendations on the site regarding this lens all say the same thing!

Quoting Mfz (Reply 5):
My recommendation: get yourself a 24-105L and enjoy some really nice photos!

As said before, with a 1.6x crop factor, 24 would be a bit long. I'm trying to get a Sigma 17-70 for a reasonable price on Ebay. If that doesn't work, I can buy it new for 309 Euros.

I'm also trying to get a Canon 70-200 f4L IS but they're difficult to get 2nd had. May go for the non-IS one, it is way cheaper.
I scratch my head, therefore I am.
 
xenon
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2001 5:12 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:50 pm

I have the Canon 17-55IS 2.8 and love it!

Cheers,

Daniel
AirTeamImages -ATI-

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: iamlucky13, kulverstukas and 17 guests