User avatar
Buyantukhaa
Posts: 2298
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 5:33 am

Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:52 am

Hi all,

After considering the Canon 28-135 and 24-105L, I realised I wanted something wider than 24mm, and cover the tele end by a 70-200 f/4L (still to be purchased). I've been reading mixed reviews on the Canon 17-85, and quite reasonable ones about the Sigma 17-70, did anybody compare them? Any thoughts, experiences?
I scratch my head, therefore I am.
 
chris78cpr
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 7:44 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:38 am

My dad has the 17-85 and really likes it. Ive used it and it's nice but not perfect.

I havn't heard anything but praise for the Sigma. Go with the 17-70.

Chris
5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
 
aero145
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:59 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:53 pm

Chris's right, Siggy wins. No IS and 15mm less range but better optics.
 
martin54
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:05 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:55 pm

During my Canon days I have owned the 17-85 and it was the worst lens I have ever had. Probably I had an extra bad copy but the general opinion on this lens is not very positive, especially if you look at the rather hefty price tag for a consumer lens.
My experience with Sigma is a lot better and I am considering the 17-70 myself to replace my ancient and rattling Nikkor 18-70.
 
User avatar
Bruce
Posts: 4935
Joined: Tue May 18, 1999 2:46 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Thu Nov 22, 2007 6:22 pm

The Canon 17-85 tends to have a lot of barrel distortion at the wider ranges. How is the Sigma?

I have the 17-85 and its just ok.

Bruce
Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
 
mfz
Posts: 212
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:54 pm

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:27 pm

Keep away from the Canon 17-85 IS! After having had good results with the EF-S 10-22 as my first EF-S lens in a line-up of L-series-lenses (17-40L, 100-400L) I decided to try the EF-S 17-85. The worst lens I've ever owned! Massive barrel distortion, completely unsharp at 17-30mm, soft contrast, etc.! Borrowed a 24-105L from am colleague for my recent New Zealand-trip and I am totally happy with it! My recommendation: get yourself a 24-105L and enjoy some really nice photos!

Cheers,
Mike
Extra Bavariam non est vita et si est non est ita! --- My flights: http://my.flightmemory.com/mfz
 
SNATH
Posts: 3049
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:23 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Fri Nov 30, 2007 5:40 pm



Quoting Mfz (Reply 5):
My recommendation: get yourself a 24-105L and enjoy some really nice photos!

I have this and it's a great great lens. BUT on a 1.6x body, you need something wider than 24 in a lot of cases. I compliment it with the 17-40 and the combination is awesome. However, I wouldn't have the 24-105L as my only lens on a 1.6x body. It's just not wide enough. For me at least.

Tony
Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
 
User avatar
dvincent
Posts: 1488
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:53 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Fri Nov 30, 2007 5:55 pm

There is also the third option of the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8. Not as long but it's f/2.8 all the way through and tack sharp. Combine it with a circular polarizer and you get awesome results.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dan Vincent



I hear the new Canon 18-55 IS is kicking butt and taking names in the image quality department, which is very surprising considering it's just a kit lens but it looks like a really good deal if you're broke and don't mind plasticky build quality.

[Edited 2007-11-30 10:00:33]
From the Mind of Minolta
 
User avatar
Buyantukhaa
Posts: 2298
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 5:33 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:09 pm



Quoting Mfz (Reply 5):
Keep away from the Canon 17-85 IS!

I will, it seems the recommendations on the site regarding this lens all say the same thing!

Quoting Mfz (Reply 5):
My recommendation: get yourself a 24-105L and enjoy some really nice photos!

As said before, with a 1.6x crop factor, 24 would be a bit long. I'm trying to get a Sigma 17-70 for a reasonable price on Ebay. If that doesn't work, I can buy it new for 309 Euros.

I'm also trying to get a Canon 70-200 f4L IS but they're difficult to get 2nd had. May go for the non-IS one, it is way cheaper.
I scratch my head, therefore I am.
 
xenon
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2001 5:12 am

RE: Canon 17-85 Vs. Sigma 17-70

Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:50 pm

I have the Canon 17-55IS 2.8 and love it!

Cheers,

Daniel
AirTeamImages -ATI-

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos