SVOLNI
Topic Author
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:37 am

Are These Photos Really Soft?

Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:29 pm

Hello,

some of my uploaded photos were screened today but all of them didn't passed the first screening. Normally it's no problem for me if some photos weren't accepted but the following rejections makes me thoughtfully. I prepare all my photos with Adobe Photoshop Elements and I always use the same parameters for sharpening. The original photos are sharp like other photos which were accepted.

Could you please say what you really think about the following and my other photos on Airliners.net? In many discussion boards everybody say to every photo that it looks very good. It would be great if you would help me to improve my photos.


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...20071127_BEA-AP-BHX-MAN-070615.jpg
Reject reason: quality personal soft

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...071127_BEA-D-IFKU-JUI-070903-1.jpg
Reject reason: soft

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...20071127_BEA-D-AIAZ-HAM-070503.jpg
Reject reason: soft

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...20071127_BEA-G-EUPK-BSL-070312.jpg
Reject reason: quality grainy soft

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...1127_BEA-RA-82077-HAM-070704-3.jpg
Reject reason: blurry personal soft


Thank you in advance.

Best regards
Sven Ole Niwek
 
flipdewaf
Posts: 1595
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 6:28 am

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:37 pm

personally I dont see it either. That BA airbus seems to have a hell of a list going on.

Fred
Image
 
DeltaAVL
Posts: 1525
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:15 pm

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:43 pm

#1: Don't see any softness.

#2: Ever-so-slightly soft, it's almost unnoticeable, though. This is really picky screening.

#3: Somewhat soft, but in many cases exceptions are made for dusk shots. Apparently not this time...

#4: AWESOME shot. It's just a tad soft, and with some very subtle sharpening it will be perfect. I still would have thought this would have been accepted, though. Grainy? Not in the least. Maybe he ticked the wrong box.

#5: Don't see any softness.


All I can say is "wow". I've never seen the screeners being THIS picky.

[Edited 2007-11-27 14:44:08]
"We break, We bend, With hand in hand, When hope is gone, Just hang on." -Guster
 
RCoulter
Posts: 456
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:02 am

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:17 pm

I wonder if the screeners got the new monitors and they are not working out as they should because these shots look fine...
 
mattbna
Posts: 280
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:24 pm

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:25 pm



Quoting DeltaAVL (Reply 2):
All I can say is "wow". I've never seen the screeners being THIS picky.

Pathetic, isn't it?



Matt

--
Canon EOS 7D & 40D -- 100-400mm L IS -- 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II -- 28-135mm IS -- 10-22mm -- 18-55mm EF-S
 
eadster
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:31 pm

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:30 pm

What a load of crap - those shots look dead on the money to me. Tried to appeal them?
 
mattbna
Posts: 280
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:24 pm

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:31 pm



Quoting RCoulter (Reply 3):
I wonder if the screeners got the new monitors and they are not working out as they should because these shots look fine...

If they didn't all set their resolution to the proper dimensions for the new monitor size, we are going to see all sorts of bogus soft / sharp rejections.

I've been asking for months what will be done to ensure that all of the screener's monitors are color-calibrated properly and I'm yet to received an answer. Giving all of them a new monitor is all well and good...but without proper color / contrast / brightness calibration it isn't going to mean squat.

With all of them having different video cards and no two monitors (or video cards) being the same, I don't know how they have ever screened photos with true consistency between screeners.

I purchased a ColorVision Spyder2Pro a few weeks ago and couldn't believe how far off my monitors were after the first time I used it!


Matt

--
Canon EOS 7D & 40D -- 100-400mm L IS -- 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II -- 28-135mm IS -- 10-22mm -- 18-55mm EF-S
 
Daleaholic
Posts: 2654
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 9:38 am

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:33 pm

I have a Dell Monitor, same brand of monitor as the screeners... mine is smaller (19 inch widescreen)... They have 22inch monitors.

Those shots all look top notch and perfect on my screen. They either clearly do not have their monitor settings set properly (actually on the monitor, not on the computer) or they are being extremely pathetic.

Needs sorting...
Religion is an illusion of childhood... Outgrown under proper education.
 
eadster
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:31 pm

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:19 pm

And its great to see that there has been a helpful response about this too  irked 
 
shep2
Posts: 115
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:29 pm

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:46 pm

Soft Rejections have been a bit questionable lately - I'm sure the screeners are working on calibrating their new monitors for consistant results... we hope !!

Typo - spelling correction...

[Edited 2007-11-28 16:15:44]
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:04 am

They don't look soft to me (but most of my rejections are for 'soft', so what do I know ...).
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
ZakHH
Posts: 1570
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:32 pm

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:46 am



Quoting Mattbna (Reply 6):
I've been asking for months what will be done to ensure that all of the screener's monitors are color-calibrated properly and I'm yet to received an answer. Giving all of them a new monitor is all well and good...but without proper color / contrast / brightness calibration it isn't going to mean squat.

With all of them having different video cards and no two monitors (or video cards) being the same, I don't know how they have ever screened photos with true consistency between screeners.

Very valid point, Matt. Providing all screeners with the same monitor type does not help much in itself. Providing calibration devices and standard settings would show much more effect towards consistency.

I played with a calibration tool myself recently, and was also surprised on how different the results were on different monitors I work with (home desktop, laptop, work desktop).

As for the rejections, I agree with everyone here and fail to see any softness, except maybe in shot #4.
Tired of a.net? Join a friendly aviation community!
 
metroliner
Posts: 847
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:35 am

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:54 am

They look fine to me, too. I'm on a standard monitor at university and there really is nothing wrong.

What on earth is a 'personal' rejection anyway?

Toni
Set the controls for the heart of the Sun
 
TransIsland
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 9:22 pm

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:10 pm

While some of these pix may be bordercase (B/N Islander), I tend to agree with all the rejections - with one exception, I can't see any rejectable grain either.
I'm an aviation expert. I have Sky Juice for breakfast.
 
User avatar
dvincent
Posts: 1488
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:53 am

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:18 pm



Quoting Metroliner (Reply 12):
What on earth is a 'personal' rejection anyway?

The screener left a personal comment to the photographer.
From the Mind of Minolta
 
User avatar
cpd
Posts: 4639
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:46 am

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:20 pm

I really like this one:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...20071127_BEA-D-AIAZ-HAM-070503.jpg

The personal rejection I think is that a screener included a personal message.
 
metroliner
Posts: 847
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:35 am

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Thu Nov 29, 2007 1:10 pm



Quoting Dvincent (Reply 14):
The screener left a personal comment to the photographer.



Quoting Cpd (Reply 15):
a screener included a personal message.

...thank you.  Smile

I wonder what they said about the photos that could be improved.

Toni
Set the controls for the heart of the Sun
 
Psych
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:16 pm

Clearly there are many questioning soft rejections recently in this and other recent threads. I agree that it may be appropriate for you to appeal at least one of the photos, Sven, to ensure that you get some further feedback from the Head screeners. You have nothing to lose by such a course of action because now you will not lose another 2% should your photo be rejected for a second time.

I wonder whether it may be helpful for some example shots to be discussed in some more detail in a dedicated thread, with input from the screening team, to illustrate what to some can seem to be a fine line between soft - correctly sharpened - oversharpened.

All the best.

Paul
 
Silver1SWA
Crew
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 pm

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Fri Nov 30, 2007 12:24 am



Quoting RCoulter (Reply 3):
I wonder if the screeners got the new monitors and they are not working out as they should because these shots look fine...

I immediately wondered this myself. One thing that concerns me is the amount of detail these new monitors might show that might otherwise be unnoticeable to most monitors. My monitor at home is very, very clear and has sharp, crisp contrast. It is also very bright. At home, I can see grain that is undetectable on other monitors I use. This raises a concern for me. I have a feeling that the new monitors might be so good that screening will be even tougher than before because very subtle flaws wont appear so subtle to the screeners.

Just a thought...if any of that makes sense...
ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
 
User avatar
cpd
Posts: 4639
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:46 am

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:56 am

I haven't seen anything mentioned, but can I ask what these "new monitors" are. Exact brand, model - etc.

Because to me the Lufthansa one (http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20071127_BEA-D-AIAZ-HAM-070503.jpg) looks sharp (but not too sharp) on a Apple A1081 screen (calibrated with Spyder2Pro).
 
dacman
Posts: 380
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2000 9:22 am

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:54 am

I too have been getting numerous soft and or oversharpened rejections which has never ever been a problem. It has been a bit frustrating to be sure, my eyes aren't that bad.

By the way, are any of the screeners umpires or referees by chance? Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehe.

Michael
(Dacman)
LAX / LGB Local
"Airliner Photography is not a crime"
 
SVOLNI
Topic Author
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:37 am

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:24 pm

Hello

Thank you very much for all your responses.

The screener wrote the following message regarding photo #1 and #5:
"Soft front end.Portions of the AC are soft / blurry."

It's enjoyable to read that the photos look fine for the most of you. I will appeal some of the photos and inform you about the results as soon as possible.

Sorry for delayed reply. I was not in access of the internet last week.

Best regards,

Sven Ole Niwek
 
shep2
Posts: 115
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:29 pm

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:21 am

Great to hear the "Soft" issue is clearing up... I've been following this lately and I'm sure the screeners are working on a solution - if not already fixed as I speak...  bigthumbsup 
 
dacman
Posts: 380
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2000 9:22 am

RE: Are These Photos Really Soft?

Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:41 pm

Gary,

Nice meeting you as well, hope you and Tim had a nice visit to Los Angeles.

Wish I was in my early 20's again but just an old fart nowadays.

Take care

Michael
(Dacman)
LAX / LGB local
"Airliner Photography is not a crime"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos