ua935
Posts: 547
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:41 am

Photo Info - Knackered Once Again

Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:33 pm

Yep, title says it all.

The info doesn't match the photo, once again.

I give up posting in site related, no one seems to give a F*** over there. Excusive the expleative but this site goes from bad to worse with no comment from the owners.

A friend of mine Steve Flint had an image acepted today of a Qf 744, info is for an IB A319, furthermore it is one bad ass shot, 300 F2.8 with 1.4x and 2 x converters stacked + the crop factor thats a whole 1092mm Baby!

Some may say that when Johan had the site it was slow etc but I have never known so many issues with info/images/soft rejections.

Edit:- I have just clicked on trhe view image LARGE option and it comes up with a completly different image to the info and image!

[Edited 2007-12-12 15:37:21]
Live every second like you mean it
 
NIKV69
Posts: 10893
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:27 am

RE: Photo Info - Knackered Once Again

Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:41 pm



Quoting UA935 (Thread starter):
300 F2.8 with 1.4x and 2 x converters stacked + the crop factor thats a whole 1092mm Baby!

I got to try that!

Quoting UA935 (Thread starter):
Some may say that when Johan had the site it was slow etc but I have never known so many issues with info/images/soft rejections.

Sorry can't resist.

Hey that guy with the private jet can bail us out! Why? HE CAN AFFORD IT!
 
User avatar
dlednicer
Crew
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 9:35 am

RE: Photo Info - Knackered Once Again

Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:51 pm



Quoting UA935 (Thread starter):
I give up posting in site related, no one seems to give a F*** over there. Excusive the expleative but this site goes from bad to worse with no comment from the owners.

Part of the reason that you haven't seen any response is that the crew is working very hard on fixing this and don't have the time to go trolling for comments. The code supporting the site has been described as a "Winchester House", in reference to the famous house of that name in California - additions added to additions... DM is working very hard on getting the bugs out and at the same time making the code more supportable. This can't be fixed with the click of one's fingers.

Instead of letting your imagination provide a conclusion that people don't care, let your imigination provide you a picture of people frantically working on code trying to fix things. That is the reality.
 
maiznblu_757
Posts: 4952
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2002 12:05 pm

RE: Photo Info - Knackered Once Again

Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:05 am



Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 1):
I got to try that!

Maybe someday.  Silly

Quoting UA935 (Thread starter):
Some may say that when Johan had the site it was slow etc but I have never known so many issues with info/images/soft rejections.

It is frustrating when this happens every other day. Hopefully they will figure it out once and for all.
 
aero145
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:59 am

RE: Photo Info - Knackered Once Again

Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:35 am



Quoting UA935 (Thread starter):
Steve Flint



Quoting UA935 (Thread starter):
300 F2.8 with 1.4x and 2 x

Darn, he only let me try his lens with 2x!  mad 

 Silly
 
michlis
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 8:13 am

RE: Photo Info - Knackered Once Again

Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:23 pm



Quoting Dlednicer (Reply 2):
The code supporting the site has been described as a "Winchester House", in reference to the famous house of that name in California - additions added to additions...

Whoa! That is not encouraging!
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the outcome of a hundred battles.
 
Mr Spaceman
Posts: 2723
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2001 5:09 am

RE: Photo Info - Knackered Once Again

Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:53 pm

Hi guys.

I posted about a wrong info problem in the Site Related Forum over 10 hours ago & nobody has replied to me. But I do have a question to ask below in here ........

My photo with the wrong info has another problem too ( it's photo ID # 1304527), in my case the pixel dimensions of my shot have been changed .... thus it looks like garbage!

I uploaded it at 1024 x 683 (at a 3:2 ratio) and it's now stretched out at 1200 X 798 (Another bug to be squished!).

My photo is of a Cessna 185 (C-GKRC) on floats at Val d' Or, Quebec on Oct 3 2007 during rainy conditions.

It's being shown as a Caravelle III in Caracas, Venezuela from 1966 .... the year I was born!  Silly

Quoting Dlednicer (Reply 2):
Part of the reason that you haven't seen any response is that the crew is working very hard on fixing this and don't have the time to go trolling for comments.



Quoting Dlednicer (Reply 2):
Instead of letting your imagination provide a conclusion that people don't care, let your imigination provide you a picture of people frantically working on code trying to fix things. That is the reality.

Questions? ......

>> Dlednicer, I understand the bug is being worked on & that the crew is too busy to reply to the forums, so I'm glad that you have taken the time to reply to this forum because it is a frustrating feeling when you don't get any feedback from the crew or anyone after your photo has been getting viewed for 10 hours while its info is wrong & its pixel dimensions are screwed up.

I hope this bug is fixed while my photo is being viewed so that it looks better & people get to read about its info & my remarks.

BUT, what happens if it doesn't get fixed before its viewing it done in the lastest 24-48 hour section???

When it's pulled from the latest uploads viewing, where will it go? Will it be in the category of Caravelle III's & under the wrong photographer's name?

This other photographer appears to have his first photo on Anet, but it's my shot. His name is David john allen & I bet he's pretty confused right now.

Thanks, Chris  Smile
"Just a minute while I re-invent myself"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests