Ridgerunner
Topic Author
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:09 pm

New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:32 pm

I am new to airliners.net and I'm not having any luck with my photos. I would like to hear suggestions on this photo and any advise for dusk, dawn, and night photos. Thank You.

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...o.main?filename=20071221_N815E.jpg
 
User avatar
clickhappy
Posts: 9042
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2001 12:10 pm

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:45 pm

Hi Travis.

A couple of things

The crop is a little awkward, the missing wingtip on the left side takes away from the shot and the crop is a little loose on the right side.

But, the biggest hurdle you face is the overall quality, your shot is really grainy, soft, and lacking in contrast. A good place to start would be to shoot for a finished size of 1024 pixels wide.

Please browse the database to see the type of quality needed to be successful here.
 
Ridgerunner
Topic Author
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:09 pm

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Fri Dec 21, 2007 5:04 pm

I understand about the cropping, I was wondering if I should give up photos taken before sunrise. I don't know how to make it any sharper with such little light. That seems to elude me. I will keep working on better photos and will try some of my regular daylight shots first. Thanks.
 
Psych
Posts: 2944
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 1:17 am

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Fri Dec 21, 2007 5:10 pm

Hello Travis.

What equipment are you using here - to take the photo and also to edit? I ask because the points Royal raises are key - personally I like the motive you have tried out here with the low light and the moon, but the quality/sharpness etc are just not there.

I would be happy to help out with an edit if you would like - you can contact me via my profile shoudl you wish.

All the best.

Paul
 
Skydoll
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:49 pm

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Fri Dec 21, 2007 5:47 pm

I'm new to Airliners.net, too, and this is my first time looking at the photography section, but I think your photo is nice. I like the pink sky and the moon. But I've got a lot to learn as well.

Heather
 
michlis
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 8:13 am

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:29 pm



Quoting Ridgerunner (Reply 2):
I understand about the cropping, I was wondering if I should give up photos taken before sunrise.

I would suggest on working on getting more experience with taking photos with better lighting. Once you get the knack of proper exposure, then push the envelope.
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the outcome of a hundred battles.
 
GUAMVICE
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:46 am

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:46 pm



Quoting Michlis (Reply 5):
I would suggest on working on getting more experience with taking photos with better lighting. Once you get the knack of proper exposure, then push the envelope.

 checkmark 

You will learn, as I have, that any photo worth uploading is a photo in good light. Once you have that apsect grasped, you can be a little more creative  Smile.
The two most engaging powers of a photographer are to make new things familiar and to make familiar things new. ~Thacker
 
scottieprecord
Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 5:38 am

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:01 pm

I did a quick edit of your shot, and I don't think it's that far off. I'm with Paul in wondering what equipment you're using, because the lighting and the actual exposure don't seem that bad to me.

Mike
 
User avatar
dvincent
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:53 am

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:04 pm



Quoting Scottieprecord (Reply 7):
I did a quick edit of your shot, and I don't think it's that far off. I'm with Paul in wondering what equipment you're using, because the lighting and the actual exposure don't seem that bad to me.

I don't think the blurriness can be saved... this is where some form of IS would have really saved the day. I also see some noise. Was this taken on an SLR or a point n shoot digicam?
From the Mind of Minolta
 
CalgaryBill
Posts: 618
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 12:27 am

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:45 pm



Quoting Ridgerunner (Reply 2):
I don't know how to make it any sharper with such little light.

Did you use a tripod?

B
 
Ridgerunner
Topic Author
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:09 pm

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:03 am

II took this with my digital Minolta, a 6 mega-pixel. I took this on the way out to get the plane ready, so I didn't have a tripod with me. I will say I'm much better at flying than taking pictures. I do take a lot of snap shots out the window, and never thought about sending any into this website until talking to a few friends (non-photographers, just aviation enthusiast) I do have a 35mm film camera too. That might help too and a lot of reading and looking at this site would go a long way to improving my pictures. Thanks to everyone for all the good information and I will be checking back in after the holidays. Travis.
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:12 am



Quoting GuamVICE (Reply 6):
any photo worth uploading is a photo in good light.

Nonsense. I have many uploads taken in bad light.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
User avatar
dvincent
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:53 am

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:39 am



Quoting Ridgerunner (Reply 10):


II took this with my digital Minolta, a 6 mega-pixel. I took this on the way out to get the plane ready, so I didn't have a tripod with me. I will say I'm much better at flying than taking pictures. I do take a lot of snap shots out the window, and never thought about sending any into this website until talking to a few friends (non-photographers, just aviation enthusiast) I do have a 35mm film camera too. That might help too and a lot of reading and looking at this site would go a long way to improving my pictures. Thanks to everyone for all the good information and I will be checking back in after the holidays. Travis.

An SLR? Or was it one of the little Z cams? The 6mp Z3-5 have terrible noise response unfortunately, even with the help of antishake (which they had) at ISO 100. Definitely too may pixels on that one.

Remember to keep Antishake on in low light conditions and use as wide of an angle as you can - if you can keep the shutter speed around 1/50 to 1/8 you should be able to get something usable.
From the Mind of Minolta
 
Ridgerunner
Topic Author
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:09 pm

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:32 am

The camera is a Minolta Dimage Z-6. I'm sure my 35mm film would do much better. I carry the digital around for ease of use and just for snap shots out the window.
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:48 am



Quoting Ridgerunner (Reply 13):
I'm sure my 35mm film would do much better.

It would, but you would then have the problem of scanning the negatives into your PC. Flatbed scanners are not really able to do this with the required quality.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
User avatar
dvincent
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:53 am

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:36 pm



Quoting Ridgerunner (Reply 13):
The camera is a Minolta Dimage Z-6. I'm sure my 35mm film would do much better. I carry the digital around for ease of use and just for snap shots out the window.

For the love of god make sure you keep the antishake on!  Wink It'll really help you in these low light situations. But if your exposure time goes over a second, it won't help and you'll need a tripod.

Also try to keep it at ISO 50 or 100. You need to keep your noise down as much as possible.

What do you have for a 35mm? Canon? or Nikon?

Quoting Viv (Reply 14):
It would, but you would then have the problem of scanning the negatives into your PC. Flatbed scanners are not really able to do this with the required quality.

It's all in the scanner operator. And, well, a good scanner with digital ICE helps. I've scanned many a slide and neg on my Epson 4490. For an inexpensive scanner it produces really good scans.
From the Mind of Minolta
 
Ridgerunner
Topic Author
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:09 pm

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Sat Dec 22, 2007 3:08 pm

My 35 mm film is a Minolta. My scanner is a Epson V100, a flatbed scanner that can scan negatives too. I seem to have good luck with my digital camera in normal lighting. I think I will spend some time practicing with exposure in different light situations. I might have some time off to go practice soon, then I will try again. Thanks.
 
USAir_757
Posts: 949
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2000 12:30 am

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:12 pm



Quoting Dvincent (Reply 15):
It's all in the scanner operator.

Not true with flatbeds. I've tried many, they are meant for prints are quite simply unable to produce high-quality scans of film. If you lay the slide film directly on the glass without using the "adapter" you get rainbow patterns all over the place, and if you use the "adapter" you get out-of-focus/doubled images.

Dedicated film scanners on the other hand still can produce as good of results as digital (if not better depending on the scanner, film and operator)
-Cullen Wassell @ MLI | Pentax K5 + DA18-55WR + Sigma 70-300 DL Macro Super
 
User avatar
dvincent
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:53 am

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:16 pm



Quoting USAir_757 (Reply 17):
Not true with flatbeds. I've tried many, they are meant for prints are quite simply unable to produce high-quality scans of film. If you lay the slide film directly on the glass without using the "adapter" you get rainbow patterns all over the place, and if you use the "adapter" you get out-of-focus/doubled images.

I've scanned dozens of negs on my flatbed Epson with little trouble, but I admit it's not the same as using the ole drum or a Minolta Dimage film scanner.

Digital ICE really helps, though.
From the Mind of Minolta
 
USAir_757
Posts: 949
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2000 12:30 am

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:07 pm

Got some examples? I'm open to being proven wrong...
-Cullen Wassell @ MLI | Pentax K5 + DA18-55WR + Sigma 70-300 DL Macro Super
 
User avatar
dvincent
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:53 am

RE: New Photographer, This Phjoto Rejected.

Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:41 pm

Quoting USAir_757 (Reply 19):
Got some examples? I'm open to being proven wrong...

Nothing aviation related, I'm afraid, but here's a good example.



Scaled down a bit for the web, but it wasn't bad for an ISO 100 Fuji slide with my old manual focus Yashica. The worst problem is grain but today's software makes that negligible. It's not something I'd make a huge print of, but it's very serviceable.

I used to do film scans as part of the print I used to do. Now I'm out of that business, and I won't disagree with you about true film scanners being the best, but a good (read, not $100) flatbed with a good transparency handler (such as the Epson Perfection 4490) and Digital ICE can scan slides or film for good results.

[Edited 2007-12-22 14:44:07]
From the Mind of Minolta

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 10 guests