777MechSys
Topic Author
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:49 am

Rejection Clarification

Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:15 pm

I got a rejection on this photo:

Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 683 File size: 502kb


Blurry and Double. The double really baffles me. I appealed and got re-rejected for Blurry and Double.

I can accept the Blurry rejection. I'm not the best at panning shots. The database has a whole 47 DHL DC-9. 95% of those are either landing, taxiing, or stationary.

Can some one explain the Double? I have 1 shot in the database of N966AX. It is a side on sunny shot as it taxied by. In fact here it is:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Erick Lopez



The shots were taken on different days. One shot is a taxi to the south and the rejected "Double" is a take off to the north.

DHL sends a DC-9 to BFI almost everyday. Does this mean I can no longer upload side on shots of this airplane?

-Erick
 
jetmatt777
Crew
Posts: 3143
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 2:16 am

RE: Rejection Clarification

Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:10 am

That makes no sense to me, the blurry is understandable, but Double? I guess I need to read the upload guidelines again, as it says a Double is a shot taken in a similar sequence on the same day with the same motiv (taxi, land, takeoff, etc.). And both shots are from different dates, diferent shooting sequences, and on different motives.

Very strange, maybe a screener can elaborate.
-Matt
Lighten up while you still can, don't even try to understand, just find a place to make your stand and take it easy
 
unattendedbag
Posts: 2171
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 10:35 pm

RE: Rejection Clarification

Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:11 am



Quoting 777MechSys (Thread starter):
The double really baffles me.

yeah, I agree. I can't understand why double was given as a rejection reason. Same plane, but different days and different stages of operation. I can understand someone trying to get 3 or 4 of the same aircraft accepted with the same conditions, but 2?
Slower traffic, keep right
 
User avatar
acontador
Posts: 1381
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 11:54 pm

RE: Rejection Clarification

Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:23 pm

Hi Erick,

Unfortunately, I think the problem is that you indicated for the date on both only same month/year (no specific day). You probably have your reasons for doing so, which is OK, but as screeners we have to consider the possibility that the pictures were taken on the same day (unless of course it is very evident from the pictures that they were taken on different days, like one sunny and one overcast). To my eye they both look like they could have been taken on same day, and in absence of any other information (which I think you didn't provide, either in the remark or the comment fields), and considering they both show the aircraft from a very similar angle, they qualify as a double.
Please put yourself in our shoes: How can we know they weren't taken on the same day?
As long as you have to upload without exact date, you'll probably face the same problem in case you're uploading pictures of same aircraft/airport/side. In any case, I suggest next time this happens you put a comment to screeners in this respect.

Hope this clarifies your doubts.
Just sit back, relax and have a glass of Merlot...enjoy your life!
 
777MechSys
Topic Author
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:49 am

RE: Rejection Clarification

Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:12 pm

Andres,

Thank you for your reply. I agree with you about why I initially received the double rejection. In fact the original rejection does not bother me. I put myself in the screeners shoes all the time.

What stirs me up is the fact that the appeal was also given a double rejection. I fully explained that the shots where on different days. I even gave a full explanation to such, not just a "trust me". When the appeal received the double rejection I felt one of two things. First, it makes me feel the appeal was not given a fair chance and just rubber stamped. I'm not saying this is what happened. You have to put yourself in my shoes and see how that looks after I provided a full explanation. Second, it makes me feel like I am being called a liar. Like i'm trying to pull a fast one on the screeners.


-Erick

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ChrisKen and 1 guest

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos