C133
Topic Author
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:34 am

Rejection--again

Sun Jul 27, 2008 4:46 pm

Hey guys, I'm having a hard time swallowing this one, rejected for Quality grainy. Maybe I need to upgrade my eyes. Any comments appreciated. Oh, and I realize the airplane is 'common', but the tail number wasn't in the database when I uploaded.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20080722_N909WNlax080701tw.jpg
Fine: Tax for doing wrong. Tax: Fine for doing well.
 
User avatar
TupolevTu154
Posts: 1918
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:00 pm

RE: Rejection--again

Sun Jul 27, 2008 4:55 pm

Nice photograph, but it is indeed very grainy. Did you use a high ISO?

Tom Big grin
 
Fly747
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:03 am

RE: Rejection--again

Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:19 pm

Very grainy and too saturated as well,

Ivan
 
C133
Topic Author
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:34 am

RE: Rejection--again

Mon Jul 28, 2008 4:28 am

Very grainy. Wow. Okay, it's very grainy if you say so, but it's grainy at 200 ISO on a D3. I only wish I could see it, and thanks for the replies.
Fine: Tax for doing wrong. Tax: Fine for doing well.
 
ua935
Posts: 547
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:41 am

RE: Rejection--again

Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:08 am

The lower fuselage is very, very grainy.
Live every second like you mean it
 
paulinbna
Posts: 1046
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 1:18 pm

RE: Rejection--again

Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:13 am



Quoting UA935 (Reply 4):
The lower fuselage is very, very grainy.

Along with the blue part of the nose.
Canon 50D user; 100-400 MM L IS 10-22 MM, 60MM Macro
 
Fly747
Posts: 1361
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:03 am

RE: Rejection--again

Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:53 am



Quoting C133 (Reply 3):
Very grainy. Wow. Okay, it's very grainy if you say so, but it's grainy at 200 ISO on a D3. I only wish I could see it, and thanks for the replies.

I don't just say so, compare it with this picture and judge for yourself  Wink

Ivan
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ben Wang

 
User avatar
FYODOR
Posts: 708
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:13 am

RE: Rejection--again

Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:45 pm

Problem might can be solved if you'll use NeatImage program to reduce the noise. But you have start to work with your image from the beginning then.

Regards,

Fyodor
 
codeshare
Posts: 1689
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 2:23 am

RE: Rejection--again

Mon Jul 28, 2008 1:03 pm



Quoting C133 (Reply 3):
Very grainy. Wow. Okay, it's very grainy if you say so, but it's grainy at 200 ISO on a D3. I only wish I could see it, and thanks for the replies.

The photo is from a D3? You have to be joking. Looks to me like something wrong with post-processing.

KS/codeshare
How much A is there is Airliners Net ? 0 or nothing ?
 
C133
Topic Author
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:34 am

RE: Rejection--again

Mon Jul 28, 2008 1:17 pm

Time to go back to square one and see what I'M doing wrong....
Fine: Tax for doing wrong. Tax: Fine for doing well.
 
bubbles
Crew
Posts: 1124
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:54 am

RE: Rejection--again

Mon Jul 28, 2008 1:26 pm



Quoting UA935 (Reply 4):
The lower fuselage is very, very grainy.

 checkmark 

And also under wing area. In short, the shadow area is very grainy.

_Hongyin_
 
C133
Topic Author
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:34 am

RE: Rejection--again

Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:27 pm

Thanks for all the comments--I need to sharpen my eyes ans well as procedures. There's no excuse for grain on that picture. Jid has a step for edge sharpening in his sample workflow and I need to give that a try. I CAN produce acceptable images, I know I can, but nobody said it would be easy.......
Fine: Tax for doing wrong. Tax: Fine for doing well.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests