supersellertim
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:35 am

Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (supersellertim)

Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:57 pm

Darn it. This on got rejected for:
Quality
Overexposed
Level
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/...0090401_y1238262080.2708img184.jpg

Any way to possibly make it better?
 
supersellertim
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:35 am

RE: Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (supersellertim)

Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:01 am

Just thinking, it seems to been enlarged from what I had previewed in the upload que and in photoshop. Any reason for this?
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (supersellertim)

Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:04 am



Quoting Supersellertim (Thread starter):
Overexposed

Just bring down the brightness/exposure a bit (the highlights/details on the nose look blown-out).

Quoting Supersellertim (Thread starter):
Level

Looks like it needs a slight CW rotation

Quoting Supersellertim (Thread starter):
Quality

hmmm.... can't see the problem with quality... maybe someone else can chime in?
 
supersellertim
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:35 am

RE: Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (supersellertim)

Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:19 am

Alright. I have changed it a bit:
Big version: Width: 1024 Height: 731 File size: 813kb


[Edited 2009-04-01 17:25:39]
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (supersellertim)

Thu Apr 02, 2009 1:11 am

ooh...the new version looks much worse quality-wise than the first one you posted. maybe the problem lies with you saving at a lower-quality level each time you edit it or just save it in general... is the first one EXACTLY the same file as you had rejected? The second one you posted I could easily see being rejected for quality, but not so much for the first.

I'd examine your workflow and see if you aren't losing quality each time you save as a Jpeg, because there's a huge difference in quality between the first and second pictures you've posted here.

Dana
 
supersellertim
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:35 am

RE: Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (supersellertim)

Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:58 am

You know, I agree with you. I will work with that.
 
supersellertim
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:35 am

RE: Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (supersellertim)

Sun Apr 12, 2009 8:50 pm

Alright... What do you think about this:
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/117/img0333c123.jpg
 
dlowwa
Posts: 7168
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:17 pm

RE: Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (supersellertim)

Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:44 pm



Quoting Supersellertim (Reply 6):
Alright... What do you think about this:

Looks pretty blurry, probably due to the fact that you were panning in less than ideal lighting conditions. Also a little low in the frame and could use some slight CCW rotation.

Exposure and quality look ok, but, yeah, the big killer here is that it's blurry.

Dana
 
supersellertim
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 2:35 am

RE: Photo Acceptance - Post Screening (supersellertim)

Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:06 am

Thank you! I was stupid and thought that 1/250 would work out well shooting handheld, resulting in the blurry picture. I guess you live and learn, especially just starting out.. I really do appreciate the criticism as it has helped a large amount!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests