After falling in love with my Dad's D90 I took the plunge and got myself one. The bought the kit with the AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f3.5-5.6 G ED VR lens. So far I'm still loving it and am getting some "decent" shots, both av and non-av.
I'm looking to get something with a little more range but don't feeling like sacrificing a kidney to get it. So should I:
a) get the Nikkor 70-300 AF with no VR? It would mean carrying two lenses and no VR.
b) get the Sigma 70-300 AF with VR. Two lenses but cheaper than Nikkor and and with VR
c) get the Sigma 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DG. One lens, lots of flexibility but I've some bad things about the 300 end
I'm leaning towards B but I would very much appreciate any and all of your input with regards to shortcomings, reliability, softness etc.