JimmyLWH
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:04 pm

How About A 300mm Prime Lens?

Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:47 pm

Hi all,
I currently have a Sigma 100-300/4, and I'm thinking if I should have a 300mm lens, like Nikon's 300/4D. The 300mm prime lens is good no doubt, but the fixed focal length means I can't take whole fuselage shots easily. Hesitating about that.

Jimmy.
 
ckw
Posts: 4586
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:26 am

RE: How About A 300mm Prime Lens?

Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:49 pm

What don't you like about your 100-300? As a general rule, a prime is going to offer superior image quality in theory - whether this will translate into an improvement of your images to justify the cost is an entirely different matter!

While I tend to advocate buying the best glass you can afford, this might not be the solution to a particular problem which may be related to technique or the camera (eg. issues with noise).

Cheers,

Colin
Colin K. Work, Pixstel
 
NIKV69
Posts: 10889
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:27 am

RE: How About A 300mm Prime Lens?

Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:08 am

Best lens I ever bought.
Hey that guy with the private jet can bail us out! Why? HE CAN AFFORD IT!
 
User avatar
ptrjong
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:38 am

RE: How About A 300mm Prime Lens?

Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:23 am

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 2):
Best lens I ever bought.

Amen. Of course it can be too long sometimes, even more so if you insist on side-on pictures.

Peter 
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
 
darreno1
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:58 am

RE: How About A 300mm Prime Lens?

Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:59 am

You should consider renting one first to see if it'll work for you.
Nikon D7000 / Nikkor 105mm AF f2.8 / Nikkor 35 f1.8G / Nikkor 50 f1.8D / Nikkor 85mm / Nikkor 300mm f4 AF
 
viv
Posts: 2953
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:17 pm

RE: How About A 300mm Prime Lens?

Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:15 am

I would have little use for a 300 mm prime.
Depending on the circumstances, it would either be too long or not long enough.
Nikon D700, Nikkor 80-400, Fuji X Pro 1, Fujinon 35 f/1.4, Fujinon 18 f/2
 
ckw
Posts: 4586
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:26 am

RE: How About A 300mm Prime Lens?

Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:11 pm

Quoting viv (Reply 5):
I would have little use for a 300 mm prime.
Depending on the circumstances, it would either be too long or not long enough

I have 70-200 and 500mm (sold my 300mm f4 to help pay for the 500) - guess what focal length I miss the most  

I have held off on replacing the 300 as the plan was to get whatever Canon replaced the 100-400 with. Sadly that has taken much longer than expected, and the price looks like it may be a bit rich!

Fortunately the 70-200 f4 IS works very nicely with the 1.4x convertor, and I can live with the loss of a stop. The old 100-400 is not an option as I know it doesn't match up to either the 70-200 (with or without the 1.4) or 500 so I see no sense in taking a step backward.

Cheers,

Colin
Colin K. Work, Pixstel
 
NIKV69
Posts: 10889
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:27 am

RE: How About A 300mm Prime Lens?

Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:58 pm

Quoting ptrjong (Reply 3):
Amen. Of course it can be too long sometimes, even more so if you insist on side-on pictures.

That is why I also have a 80-200 2.8   
Hey that guy with the private jet can bail us out! Why? HE CAN AFFORD IT!
 
User avatar
ptrjong
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:38 am

RE: How About A 300mm Prime Lens?

Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:07 pm

Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 7):
That is why I also have a 80-200 2.8

So do I. Well, 70-200 2.8 VR   
The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests